How prevalent were nunataks as glacial refugia in the Alps? Insights from range hindcasting of the nival flora

IF 2.3 3区 生物学 Q2 PLANT SCIENCES
Zoé Rosa, Hélene Blancheteau, Julien Renaud, Maya Guéguen, Bastien Féaud, Pierre G. Valla, Wilfried Thuiller, Sébastien Ibanez, Sébastien Lavergne
{"title":"How prevalent were nunataks as glacial refugia in the Alps? Insights from range hindcasting of the nival flora","authors":"Zoé Rosa,&nbsp;Hélene Blancheteau,&nbsp;Julien Renaud,&nbsp;Maya Guéguen,&nbsp;Bastien Féaud,&nbsp;Pierre G. Valla,&nbsp;Wilfried Thuiller,&nbsp;Sébastien Ibanez,&nbsp;Sébastien Lavergne","doi":"10.1007/s00035-025-00334-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The European Alps were heavily glaciated during the Pleistocene, prompting debates about plants’ glacial refugia. While most alpine vegetation likely survived in lower mountain ranges, adjacent or disconnected from the Alps, or elsewhere in European lowlands, a century-old hypothesis suggests that some plants persisted on rocky peaks protruding from ice-covered areas. However, this so-called <i>“nunatak”</i> hypothesis has received relatively limited attention and support from phylogeographic studies. We modeled the potential distribution of 69 nival plant species during the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM, <i>circa</i> 20 to 25 ky ago) using species distribution models based on paleo-climatic conditions, paleo-ice extent, topographic metrics and bedrock lithologies. Two thirds of studied species and the majority of silicicolous species were predicted to have predominantly occurred on nunataks during the LGM in comparison to peripheral mountains or lowlands. Bedrock affinity, alongside topographic and climatic preferences, profoundly influenced predictions of species’ refugia locations and range contractions. Silicicolous species relied heavily on nunataks, where lithology and topographic ruggedness jointly favored their survival. Calcicolous species, in contrast, primarily found refugia in peripheral and extra-alpine massifs, the inner Alps being largely uninhabitable—either due to the extensive ice cover on calcareous massifs, often located at lower elevations, or because unglaciated ones were too unsuitable for their persistence. Generalist species, with broader ecological flexibility, persisted across more diverse refugia, favoring mainly the less harsh peripheral regions. Multivariate analyses identified seven cooccurring species groups associated with distinct potential refugia. Our findings challenge the view that nunatak refugia were undervalued during glacial periods, highlighting their significance for siliceous rock-specialist nival species. This work provides a well-delimited framework for further research on alpine paleobiogeography.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51238,"journal":{"name":"Alpine Botany","volume":"135 2","pages":"149 - 166"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alpine Botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00035-025-00334-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The European Alps were heavily glaciated during the Pleistocene, prompting debates about plants’ glacial refugia. While most alpine vegetation likely survived in lower mountain ranges, adjacent or disconnected from the Alps, or elsewhere in European lowlands, a century-old hypothesis suggests that some plants persisted on rocky peaks protruding from ice-covered areas. However, this so-called “nunatak” hypothesis has received relatively limited attention and support from phylogeographic studies. We modeled the potential distribution of 69 nival plant species during the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM, circa 20 to 25 ky ago) using species distribution models based on paleo-climatic conditions, paleo-ice extent, topographic metrics and bedrock lithologies. Two thirds of studied species and the majority of silicicolous species were predicted to have predominantly occurred on nunataks during the LGM in comparison to peripheral mountains or lowlands. Bedrock affinity, alongside topographic and climatic preferences, profoundly influenced predictions of species’ refugia locations and range contractions. Silicicolous species relied heavily on nunataks, where lithology and topographic ruggedness jointly favored their survival. Calcicolous species, in contrast, primarily found refugia in peripheral and extra-alpine massifs, the inner Alps being largely uninhabitable—either due to the extensive ice cover on calcareous massifs, often located at lower elevations, or because unglaciated ones were too unsuitable for their persistence. Generalist species, with broader ecological flexibility, persisted across more diverse refugia, favoring mainly the less harsh peripheral regions. Multivariate analyses identified seven cooccurring species groups associated with distinct potential refugia. Our findings challenge the view that nunatak refugia were undervalued during glacial periods, highlighting their significance for siliceous rock-specialist nival species. This work provides a well-delimited framework for further research on alpine paleobiogeography.

努纳塔克作为阿尔卑斯山的冰川避难所有多普遍?植物区系范围反演的启示
欧洲阿尔卑斯山脉在更新世期间被严重冰川覆盖,引发了关于植物冰川避难所的争论。虽然大多数高山植被可能存活在较低的山脉,与阿尔卑斯山相邻或分离,或在欧洲低地的其他地方,但一个世纪以来的假设表明,一些植物存活在从冰雪覆盖地区突出的岩石山峰上。然而,这种所谓的“nunatak”假说在系统地理学研究中得到的关注和支持相对有限。利用基于古气候条件、古冰范围、地形指标和基岩岩性的物种分布模型,模拟了末次盛冰期(LGM,约20 ~ 25 ky前)69种植物的潜在分布。与周边山地或低地相比,预计三分之二的研究物种和大多数硅化物种在LGM期间主要发生在nunataks上。基岩亲和力,以及地形和气候偏好,深刻地影响了物种避难所位置和范围收缩的预测。矽酸盐物种严重依赖于冰原,那里的岩性和地形的坚固性共同有利于它们的生存。相比之下,钙质物种主要在外围和高山外的地块上找到避难所,阿尔卑斯内部基本上不适合居住,要么是因为钙质地块上覆盖着广泛的冰层,通常位于较低的海拔,要么是因为没有冰川的地方太不适合它们的生存。具有更大生态灵活性的多面手物种在更多样化的避难所中持续存在,主要倾向于环境不那么恶劣的周边地区。多变量分析确定了与不同潜在避难所相关的七个共同发生的物种群。我们的发现挑战了冰川期努纳塔克遗迹被低估的观点,突出了它们对硅质岩石专家nival物种的重要性。这项工作为进一步研究高山古生物地理学提供了一个明确的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Alpine Botany
Alpine Botany PLANT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
18.50%
发文量
15
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Alpine Botany is an international journal providing a forum for plant science studies at high elevation with links to fungal and microbial ecology, including vegetation and flora of mountain regions worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信