Hao Zhu, Alex N. Phipps, Ying Yuan, Brad A. Davidson, Stacy S. Shord, Jiang Liu, Patricia M. LoRusso
{"title":"FDA-AACR Strategies for Optimizing Dosages for Oncology Drug Products: Selecting Dosages for First-In-Human Trials","authors":"Hao Zhu, Alex N. Phipps, Ying Yuan, Brad A. Davidson, Stacy S. Shord, Jiang Liu, Patricia M. LoRusso","doi":"10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-25-0095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dosage optimization has become a focus in oncology drug development, as highlighted by recent U.S. Food and Drug Administration initiatives including Project Optimus. Traditionally, most oncology drug development programs identify a maximum tolerated dosage and advance this dose in subsequent clinical trials and premarket applications. This approach has been routinely applied for cytotoxic chemotherapeutics, where higher dosages generally yield more efficacy as well as toxicity. However, it is less suited for the more targeted pharmacology of modern oncology drugs, where excessive escalation may only add additional toxicity. Instead, paradigms that utilize the totality of data accumulated throughout drug development can better determine optimized dosages that minimize the risk of underdosing, leading to exposure to subtherapeutic dosages, and overdosing, leading to unnecessary toxicities. Appropriate selection of dosing in first-in-human (FIH) trials is crucial, as it facilitates the efficient identification of optimized doses for subsequent trials. Nonclinical research and clinical data from previous trials can inform both FIH dosage selection and trial design. When background data is lacking, modeling and simulation techniques have been developed to integrate information to determine rational starting dose. Additionally, innovative model-informed clinical trial designs allow for statistically guided dose escalation and recommendation, and can be updated in real time to maximize potential patient benefit within the FIH trial. Unfortunately, these techniques remain underutilized. Here, in this first paper in a series of three discussing innovative strategies for dosage optimization, we highlight expectations and provide suggestions for the future of dosage selection and optimization in FIH oncology trials.","PeriodicalId":10279,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cancer Research","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Cancer Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-25-0095","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Dosage optimization has become a focus in oncology drug development, as highlighted by recent U.S. Food and Drug Administration initiatives including Project Optimus. Traditionally, most oncology drug development programs identify a maximum tolerated dosage and advance this dose in subsequent clinical trials and premarket applications. This approach has been routinely applied for cytotoxic chemotherapeutics, where higher dosages generally yield more efficacy as well as toxicity. However, it is less suited for the more targeted pharmacology of modern oncology drugs, where excessive escalation may only add additional toxicity. Instead, paradigms that utilize the totality of data accumulated throughout drug development can better determine optimized dosages that minimize the risk of underdosing, leading to exposure to subtherapeutic dosages, and overdosing, leading to unnecessary toxicities. Appropriate selection of dosing in first-in-human (FIH) trials is crucial, as it facilitates the efficient identification of optimized doses for subsequent trials. Nonclinical research and clinical data from previous trials can inform both FIH dosage selection and trial design. When background data is lacking, modeling and simulation techniques have been developed to integrate information to determine rational starting dose. Additionally, innovative model-informed clinical trial designs allow for statistically guided dose escalation and recommendation, and can be updated in real time to maximize potential patient benefit within the FIH trial. Unfortunately, these techniques remain underutilized. Here, in this first paper in a series of three discussing innovative strategies for dosage optimization, we highlight expectations and provide suggestions for the future of dosage selection and optimization in FIH oncology trials.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Cancer Research is a journal focusing on groundbreaking research in cancer, specifically in the areas where the laboratory and the clinic intersect. Our primary interest lies in clinical trials that investigate novel treatments, accompanied by research on pharmacology, molecular alterations, and biomarkers that can predict response or resistance to these treatments. Furthermore, we prioritize laboratory and animal studies that explore new drugs and targeted agents with the potential to advance to clinical trials. We also encourage research on targetable mechanisms of cancer development, progression, and metastasis.