Phenotype Variability in Interstitial Cystitis Clinical Trial Recruitment.

IF 1.2 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Ryan Wong, Emmaline Woodworth, Charles Wood, Sarah A Adelstein, Annah J Vollstedt
{"title":"Phenotype Variability in Interstitial Cystitis Clinical Trial Recruitment.","authors":"Ryan Wong, Emmaline Woodworth, Charles Wood, Sarah A Adelstein, Annah J Vollstedt","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>There is a need to understand phenotype-specific therapies for interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS) at the clinical trial level to move beyond trial-and-error treatment approaches.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to characterize IC/BPS clinical trials that incorporate patient phenotype into the eligibility criteria in accordance with the American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Registered IC/BPS clinical trials were identified from ClinicalTrials.gov. Trials were included if they enrolled patients with IC/BPS and addressed pain-related outcomes. Trials were assessed for phenotype recognition and categorized by intervention type, funding source, and registration date relative to the AUA's 2015 IC/BPS guidelines for initial phenotype recognition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 170 trials, 37 (21.8%) included phenotype stratification. The majority focused on bladder-centric presentations. Men were underrepresented in IC/BPS clinical trials. Phenotypic stratification was more frequently reported in industry-funded trials compared with those without industry support (40.5% vs 16.5%, P =0.0031). Trials registered after the 2015 AUA guideline update showed greater phenotype inclusion, though this was not statistically significant (26.6% vs 15.8%). Therapeutic trials comprised the majority of trials. Stratification appeared more often in physical therapy and psychosocial trials at 40% and in drug studies at 34.3%. Intravesical instillation and injection trials showed lower rates at 19.6% and 13.0%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Failure to incorporate IC/BPS phenotypes into trial design limits the ability to evaluate treatments within the context of real-world symptom variability. Bridging this methodological gap is essential to ensure that clinical research supports the development of more targeted and effective therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":75288,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001759","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: There is a need to understand phenotype-specific therapies for interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS) at the clinical trial level to move beyond trial-and-error treatment approaches.

Objective: The objective of this study was to characterize IC/BPS clinical trials that incorporate patient phenotype into the eligibility criteria in accordance with the American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines.

Study design: Registered IC/BPS clinical trials were identified from ClinicalTrials.gov. Trials were included if they enrolled patients with IC/BPS and addressed pain-related outcomes. Trials were assessed for phenotype recognition and categorized by intervention type, funding source, and registration date relative to the AUA's 2015 IC/BPS guidelines for initial phenotype recognition.

Results: Out of 170 trials, 37 (21.8%) included phenotype stratification. The majority focused on bladder-centric presentations. Men were underrepresented in IC/BPS clinical trials. Phenotypic stratification was more frequently reported in industry-funded trials compared with those without industry support (40.5% vs 16.5%, P =0.0031). Trials registered after the 2015 AUA guideline update showed greater phenotype inclusion, though this was not statistically significant (26.6% vs 15.8%). Therapeutic trials comprised the majority of trials. Stratification appeared more often in physical therapy and psychosocial trials at 40% and in drug studies at 34.3%. Intravesical instillation and injection trials showed lower rates at 19.6% and 13.0%, respectively.

Conclusions: Failure to incorporate IC/BPS phenotypes into trial design limits the ability to evaluate treatments within the context of real-world symptom variability. Bridging this methodological gap is essential to ensure that clinical research supports the development of more targeted and effective therapies.

间质性膀胱炎临床试验招募的表型变异性。
重要性:有必要在临床试验水平上了解间质性膀胱炎/膀胱疼痛综合征(IC/BPS)的表型特异性治疗方法,以超越试错治疗方法。目的:本研究的目的是根据美国泌尿协会(AUA)指南,将患者表型纳入资格标准的IC/BPS临床试验的特征。研究设计:已注册的IC/BPS临床试验从ClinicalTrials.gov网站上确定。如果纳入了IC/BPS患者并处理了与疼痛相关的结果,则纳入了试验。对试验进行表型识别评估,并根据干预类型、资金来源和注册日期(相对于AUA 2015 IC/BPS初始表型识别指南)对试验进行分类。结果:在170项试验中,37项(21.8%)纳入了表型分层。大多数演讲集中在以膀胱为中心的演讲上。男性在IC/BPS临床试验中的代表性不足。与没有行业支持的试验相比,在行业资助的试验中更频繁地报道表型分层(40.5% vs 16.5%, P=0.0031)。2015年AUA指南更新后注册的试验显示更大的表型纳入,尽管这没有统计学意义(26.6%对15.8%)。治疗性试验占试验的大多数。分层在物理治疗和社会心理试验中出现的频率更高,为40%,在药物研究中为34.3%。膀胱内滴注和注射试验的发生率较低,分别为19.6%和13.0%。结论:未能将IC/BPS表型纳入试验设计限制了在现实世界症状变异性背景下评估治疗的能力。弥合这一方法学上的差距对于确保临床研究支持开发更有针对性和更有效的治疗方法至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信