How High-Flow Nasal Cannula Is Impacted by Nasogastric/Esophageal Tube: A Bench Study.

IF 2.7 Q4 Medicine
Critical care explorations Pub Date : 2025-09-30 eCollection Date: 2025-10-01 DOI:10.1097/CCE.0000000000001325
Fernando Vieira, Annia Schreiber, Mayson L A Sousa, Rosie Butterworth, Shreyas Bhor, Antenor Rodrigues, Vorakamol Phoophiboon, Matthew Ko, Laurent Brochard
{"title":"How High-Flow Nasal Cannula Is Impacted by Nasogastric/Esophageal Tube: A Bench Study.","authors":"Fernando Vieira, Annia Schreiber, Mayson L A Sousa, Rosie Butterworth, Shreyas Bhor, Antenor Rodrigues, Vorakamol Phoophiboon, Matthew Ko, Laurent Brochard","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is a common noninvasive respiratory therapy for respiratory failure, offering positive airway pressure and dead space clearance. In critically ill patients, additional nasal tubes for feeding or monitoring are often required, but their effect on HFNC performance is not well understood. This bench study evaluated the impact of nasal tube placement on dead space clearance, nasopharyngeal pressure, and airway resistance using standard and asymmetrical cannulas. Inserting a 5-Fr tube with a standard cannula had very little effect, whereas bigger sizes (12-Fr and 16-Fr) slightly increased airway pressure and reduce Co2 clearance. An asymmetrical cannula exhibited variable effects depending on the side of the tube placement. Higher pressure and better clearance were achieved with a tube placed in the smaller cannula side. However, if occlusion of the two nares becomes excessive with the tube in place, downsizing the cannula might be recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":93957,"journal":{"name":"Critical care explorations","volume":"7 10","pages":"e1325"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12487933/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001325","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is a common noninvasive respiratory therapy for respiratory failure, offering positive airway pressure and dead space clearance. In critically ill patients, additional nasal tubes for feeding or monitoring are often required, but their effect on HFNC performance is not well understood. This bench study evaluated the impact of nasal tube placement on dead space clearance, nasopharyngeal pressure, and airway resistance using standard and asymmetrical cannulas. Inserting a 5-Fr tube with a standard cannula had very little effect, whereas bigger sizes (12-Fr and 16-Fr) slightly increased airway pressure and reduce Co2 clearance. An asymmetrical cannula exhibited variable effects depending on the side of the tube placement. Higher pressure and better clearance were achieved with a tube placed in the smaller cannula side. However, if occlusion of the two nares becomes excessive with the tube in place, downsizing the cannula might be recommended.

高流量鼻插管如何受到鼻胃/食管管的影响:一项实验研究。
高流量鼻插管(HFNC)是一种常见的无创呼吸治疗呼吸衰竭,提供气道正压和死腔清除。在危重患者中,通常需要额外的鼻管进行喂养或监测,但它们对HFNC性能的影响尚不清楚。本实验评估了使用标准和不对称鼻管放置鼻管对死腔清除、鼻咽压和气道阻力的影响。在标准插管中插入5-Fr管效果非常小,而更大的插管(12-Fr和16-Fr)会略微增加气道压力并减少二氧化碳清除率。一个不对称的导管表现出不同的效果,这取决于导管放置的侧面。在较小的导管侧放置一根导管可获得更高的压力和更好的间隙。然而,如果在放置导管的情况下,两个鼻孔的阻塞变得过度,缩小导管的尺寸可能会被推荐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信