Effect modification by levels of sex hormones in the association between adiposity and cancer incidence in the UK Biobank.

IF 2.6
LeeAnn Lucas, Yujia Lu, Edward Giovannucci, Mingyang Song
{"title":"Effect modification by levels of sex hormones in the association between adiposity and cancer incidence in the UK Biobank.","authors":"LeeAnn Lucas, Yujia Lu, Edward Giovannucci, Mingyang Song","doi":"10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-25-0246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The role of sex hormones in the sex difference between adiposity and cancer risk remains unclear. We examined body mass index (BMI) and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) estimated using a validated equation in relation to cancer incidence according to serum sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), testosterone, and estradiol among 451,500 UK Biobank participants. For cancers showing a sex-specific adiposity association, we used Cox regression to calculate multivariable hazard ratios (HR) per increase between the 10th to 90th percentiles of adiposity according to low versus high sex hormone levels. We documented 42,949 cancers over a median follow-up of 13.1 years. BMI and VAT were more strongly associated with a higher risk of esophageal, liver, and colorectal cancer in males than in females. In males, BMI showed a stronger association with esophageal (HR for high vs low SHBG = 2.38 vs 1.62, P-interaction = 0.04) and liver cancer (HR = 3.24 vs 1.96, P-interaction = 0.03) among those with high versus low SHBG, while an opposite pattern was observed for colorectal cancer (HR = 1.12 vs 1.47, P-interaction = 0.03). Among females, BMI was associated with a higher esophageal cancer risk in those with low (HR = 1.68) but not high SHBG (HR = 0.64, P-interaction = 0.025); for liver cancer, results were similar but statistically nonsignificant. No interaction by estradiol or testosterone was detected. Similar results were observed for VAT. SHBG may be an important factor underlying the sex difference in adiposity-associated risk for colorectal, esophageal, and liver cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":72514,"journal":{"name":"Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-25-0246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The role of sex hormones in the sex difference between adiposity and cancer risk remains unclear. We examined body mass index (BMI) and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) estimated using a validated equation in relation to cancer incidence according to serum sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), testosterone, and estradiol among 451,500 UK Biobank participants. For cancers showing a sex-specific adiposity association, we used Cox regression to calculate multivariable hazard ratios (HR) per increase between the 10th to 90th percentiles of adiposity according to low versus high sex hormone levels. We documented 42,949 cancers over a median follow-up of 13.1 years. BMI and VAT were more strongly associated with a higher risk of esophageal, liver, and colorectal cancer in males than in females. In males, BMI showed a stronger association with esophageal (HR for high vs low SHBG = 2.38 vs 1.62, P-interaction = 0.04) and liver cancer (HR = 3.24 vs 1.96, P-interaction = 0.03) among those with high versus low SHBG, while an opposite pattern was observed for colorectal cancer (HR = 1.12 vs 1.47, P-interaction = 0.03). Among females, BMI was associated with a higher esophageal cancer risk in those with low (HR = 1.68) but not high SHBG (HR = 0.64, P-interaction = 0.025); for liver cancer, results were similar but statistically nonsignificant. No interaction by estradiol or testosterone was detected. Similar results were observed for VAT. SHBG may be an important factor underlying the sex difference in adiposity-associated risk for colorectal, esophageal, and liver cancer.

在英国生物银行中,性激素水平对肥胖和癌症发病率之间关系的影响。
性激素在肥胖和癌症风险的性别差异中所起的作用尚不清楚。根据血清性激素结合球蛋白(SHBG)、睾酮和雌二醇,我们检查了451,500名英国生物银行参与者的体重指数(BMI)和内脏脂肪组织(VAT),并使用与癌症发病率相关的有效方程进行了估计。对于显示性别特异性肥胖关联的癌症,我们使用Cox回归计算根据性激素水平高低,每增加第10至第90百分位数的肥胖的多变量风险比(HR)。在中位13.1年的随访中,我们记录了42949例癌症。BMI和VAT与男性患食道癌、肝癌和结直肠癌的风险比女性高得多。在男性中,BMI与食管癌(高SHBG vs低SHBG的HR = 2.38 vs 1.62, p相互作用= 0.04)和肝癌(HR = 3.24 vs 1.96, p相互作用= 0.03)的相关性较强,而与结直肠癌的相关性相反(HR = 1.12 vs 1.47, p相互作用= 0.03)。在女性中,BMI与低SHBG (HR = 1.68)但不高SHBG (HR = 0.64, p交互作用= 0.025)的女性食管癌风险较高相关;对于肝癌,结果相似,但没有统计学意义。没有发现雌二醇和睾酮的相互作用。增值税也观察到类似的结果。SHBG可能是导致结直肠癌、食管癌和肝癌肥胖相关风险性别差异的一个重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信