Perception of futile care and the reasons behind providing it for the patients at end-of-life stages from the care providers' perspective.

IF 1.9 4区 哲学 Q2 ETHICS
Rasoul Ramazani, Samira Beiranvand, Sogand Daei, Zeinab Kord, Hadis Ashrafizadeh
{"title":"Perception of futile care and the reasons behind providing it for the patients at end-of-life stages from the care providers' perspective.","authors":"Rasoul Ramazani, Samira Beiranvand, Sogand Daei, Zeinab Kord, Hadis Ashrafizadeh","doi":"10.1186/s13010-025-00188-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The concept of medical futility has exposed the medical staff to many complicated conflicts. Through identifying some of these conflicts, it will be possible to have control over such situations and make plans for managing them better. The present study was conducted to determine the perception of futile care and the reasons behind it among the patients at end-of-life stages from care providers' perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This research is an analytical descriptive study which was conducted in Dezful in Iran on 308 care providers including physicians, nurses, and medical and nursing interns, in 2022. The data collection tools included 3 areas: demographic variables, investigating the perception of futile care, and investigating the reasons behind futile care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean score of perception of futile care was 103.20 ± 32.89 and the mean scores of the reasons behind providing futile care, 118.03 ± 26.09. A significant correlation was observed between the mean scores of the questionnaire for perception of futile care and the reasons behind providing futile care among end-of-life patients (P-value = 0.000, r = 0.465).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on the findings, almost half of the care providers had a moderate perception of futile care and the reasons behind providing it. The reasons behind providing futile care mentioned by the participants, as well as the positive relationship between the level of perception and the level of education, point out the need for training courses to become more familiar with the concept of futile care and change care providers' perspectives and attitudes towards end-of-life care.</p>","PeriodicalId":56062,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy Ethics and Humanities in Medicine","volume":"20 1","pages":"22"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12487491/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy Ethics and Humanities in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13010-025-00188-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The concept of medical futility has exposed the medical staff to many complicated conflicts. Through identifying some of these conflicts, it will be possible to have control over such situations and make plans for managing them better. The present study was conducted to determine the perception of futile care and the reasons behind it among the patients at end-of-life stages from care providers' perspective.

Methods: This research is an analytical descriptive study which was conducted in Dezful in Iran on 308 care providers including physicians, nurses, and medical and nursing interns, in 2022. The data collection tools included 3 areas: demographic variables, investigating the perception of futile care, and investigating the reasons behind futile care.

Results: The mean score of perception of futile care was 103.20 ± 32.89 and the mean scores of the reasons behind providing futile care, 118.03 ± 26.09. A significant correlation was observed between the mean scores of the questionnaire for perception of futile care and the reasons behind providing futile care among end-of-life patients (P-value = 0.000, r = 0.465).

Conclusions: Based on the findings, almost half of the care providers had a moderate perception of futile care and the reasons behind providing it. The reasons behind providing futile care mentioned by the participants, as well as the positive relationship between the level of perception and the level of education, point out the need for training courses to become more familiar with the concept of futile care and change care providers' perspectives and attitudes towards end-of-life care.

从护理提供者的角度来看,对无效护理的认识及其背后的原因。
背景:医疗徒劳无功的观念使医务人员面临许多复杂的冲突。通过识别其中的一些冲突,就有可能控制这种情况,并制定更好地管理它们的计划。本研究旨在从照护者的角度,探讨临终病人对无效照护的认知及原因。方法:本研究是一项分析性描述性研究,于2022年在伊朗Dezful对308名医护人员(包括医生、护士、医疗和护理实习生)进行研究。数据收集工具包括3个方面:人口统计变量,调查对无效护理的看法,以及调查无效护理背后的原因。结果:对护理无效感的平均得分为103.20±32.89分,对护理无效原因的平均得分为118.03±26.09分。对无效护理感知的问卷平均得分与临终患者提供无效护理的原因之间存在显著相关(p值= 0.000,r = 0.465)。结论:根据研究结果,几乎一半的护理提供者对无效护理及其背后的原因有中等程度的认识。参与者提到的提供无效护理背后的原因,以及感知水平与教育水平之间的正相关关系,指出需要通过培训课程来熟悉无效护理的概念,并改变护理提供者对临终关怀的观点和态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Philosophy Ethics and Humanities in Medicine
Philosophy Ethics and Humanities in Medicine Arts and Humanities-History and Philosophy of Science
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine considers articles on the philosophy of medicine and biology, and on ethical aspects of clinical practice and research. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal that encompasses all aspects of the philosophy of medicine and biology, and the ethical aspects of clinical practice and research. It also considers papers at the intersection of medicine and humanities, including the history of medicine, that are relevant to contemporary philosophy of medicine and bioethics. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine is the official publication of the Pellegrino Center for Clinical Bioethics at Georgetown University Medical Center.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信