Enhancing clinical practice: the Endoscore app for automated surgical data capture and endometriosis scoring.

IF 1.4 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Arrigo Fruscalzo, Georgia Theodorou, Ambrogio Pietro Londero, Benedetta Guani, Jean-Marc Ayoubi, Anis Feki, Carolin Marti
{"title":"Enhancing clinical practice: the Endoscore app for automated surgical data capture and endometriosis scoring.","authors":"Arrigo Fruscalzo, Georgia Theodorou, Ambrogio Pietro Londero, Benedetta Guani, Jean-Marc Ayoubi, Anis Feki, Carolin Marti","doi":"10.52054/FVVO.2025.36","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a growing unmet need to digitalise the management of clinical data in medicine. Web-based scoring applications for endometriosis align with this trend.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate a web-based application that automatically calculates endometriosis staging scores [revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine classification (r-ASRM), the revised Enzian classification (#Enzian), Endometriosis Fertility Index (EFI)] and compare it to manual scoring in a proof-of-concept study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>20 endometriosis cases operated on in 2022 were retrospectively selected. Six experienced gynaecologists were randomly allocated to either the conventional paper-based method or the digital application for staging of disease.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Completion time, score consistency among examiners and methods, and user satisfaction were recorded using a Likert scale and a subjective mental effort questionnaire (SMEQ).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In comparison to the paper-based method, the web-based tool reduced scoring time by 25.1 seconds (128.0 vs. 153.1, <i>P</i><0.05), was perceived as easier to use (higher Likert scale scores), and was associated with low-to-moderate mental effort on the SMEQ. The agreement between electronic and paper forms was rated as very good to excellent for r-ASRM [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC): 0.93] and #Enzian (ICC: 0.84), while it was moderate for EFI (ICC: 0.67). Interrater agreement utilising the electronic form demonstrated high levels, yielding very good to excellent results for r-ASRM (ICC: 0.93) and EFI (ICC: 0.82) while showing moderate agreement for #Enzian (ICC: 0.63).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The application facilitates sequential data entry for users and automatically calculates r-ASRM, #Enzian, and EFI scores. It decreases scoring duration, strongly aligns with the paper-based method, and enhances user satisfaction.</p><p><strong>What is new?: </strong>This tool can potentially improve clinical efficiency, accuracy, and consistency in the staging of endometriosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":46400,"journal":{"name":"Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn","volume":"17 3","pages":"253-262"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12489274/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52054/FVVO.2025.36","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is a growing unmet need to digitalise the management of clinical data in medicine. Web-based scoring applications for endometriosis align with this trend.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate a web-based application that automatically calculates endometriosis staging scores [revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine classification (r-ASRM), the revised Enzian classification (#Enzian), Endometriosis Fertility Index (EFI)] and compare it to manual scoring in a proof-of-concept study.

Methods: 20 endometriosis cases operated on in 2022 were retrospectively selected. Six experienced gynaecologists were randomly allocated to either the conventional paper-based method or the digital application for staging of disease.

Main outcome measures: Completion time, score consistency among examiners and methods, and user satisfaction were recorded using a Likert scale and a subjective mental effort questionnaire (SMEQ).

Results: In comparison to the paper-based method, the web-based tool reduced scoring time by 25.1 seconds (128.0 vs. 153.1, P<0.05), was perceived as easier to use (higher Likert scale scores), and was associated with low-to-moderate mental effort on the SMEQ. The agreement between electronic and paper forms was rated as very good to excellent for r-ASRM [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC): 0.93] and #Enzian (ICC: 0.84), while it was moderate for EFI (ICC: 0.67). Interrater agreement utilising the electronic form demonstrated high levels, yielding very good to excellent results for r-ASRM (ICC: 0.93) and EFI (ICC: 0.82) while showing moderate agreement for #Enzian (ICC: 0.63).

Conclusions: The application facilitates sequential data entry for users and automatically calculates r-ASRM, #Enzian, and EFI scores. It decreases scoring duration, strongly aligns with the paper-based method, and enhances user satisfaction.

What is new?: This tool can potentially improve clinical efficiency, accuracy, and consistency in the staging of endometriosis.

增强临床实践:Endoscore应用程序用于自动手术数据采集和子宫内膜异位症评分。
背景:医学临床数据数字化管理的需求越来越大。基于web的子宫内膜异位症评分应用程序符合这一趋势。目的:本研究旨在评估一个基于网络的应用程序,该应用程序自动计算子宫内膜异位症分期评分[修订的美国生殖医学学会分类(r-ASRM),修订的Enzian分类(#Enzian),子宫内膜异位症生育指数(EFI)],并在概念验证研究中将其与手动评分进行比较。方法:回顾性分析2022年收治的子宫内膜异位症患者20例。6名经验丰富的妇科医生被随机分配到传统的基于纸张的方法或数字应用程序的疾病分期。主要结果测量:使用李克特量表和主观心理努力问卷(SMEQ)记录完成时间,审查员和方法之间的得分一致性以及用户满意度。结果:与基于纸张的方法相比,基于网络的工具将评分时间缩短了25.1秒(128.0比153.1)。结论:该应用程序为用户提供了有序的数据输入,并自动计算r-ASRM, #Enzian和EFI分数。它减少了评分持续时间,与基于纸张的方法非常一致,并提高了用户满意度。有什么新鲜事吗?该工具可以潜在地提高子宫内膜异位症分期的临床效率、准确性和一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn
Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
自引率
15.00%
发文量
59
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信