Effectiveness of vitamin D supplementation in managing urinary incontinence and overactive bladder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.3 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Saad Thamer Alshahrani, Naif Alamri, Mohammad Dhafer Asiri, Meshal Omar Albabtain, Raed Alwadai, Hassan M Assiri, Saleh Alghamdi, Ali Thamer Alshahrani, Mohanad Jebril Bosily, Hussain Munyif, Omar Safar
{"title":"Effectiveness of vitamin D supplementation in managing urinary incontinence and overactive bladder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Saad Thamer Alshahrani, Naif Alamri, Mohammad Dhafer Asiri, Meshal Omar Albabtain, Raed Alwadai, Hassan M Assiri, Saleh Alghamdi, Ali Thamer Alshahrani, Mohanad Jebril Bosily, Hussain Munyif, Omar Safar","doi":"10.4081/aiua.2025.14172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>urinary incontinence (UI) and overactive bladder (OAB) are common lower urinary tract symptoms that significantly impact quality of life. Conventional pharmacologic treatments are often associated with side effects and limited efficacy, highlighting the need for alternative therapies. Vitamin D, known for its role in muscle function and its presence in the receptors of the bladder and prostate, has been proposed as a potential non-invasive intervention. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of vitamin D supplementation in the management of UI and OAB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Twelve studies (six RCTs and six cohort studies) were included. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Statistical analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.4. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) and risk ratios (RRs) were used to compare outcomes. A meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model, which was applied due to heterogeneity, as assessed by the I² statistic. Sensitivity analysis was performed using the leave-one-out method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>no significant difference was found between the vitamin D and control groups in improving UI scales (SMD = -1.04; 95% CI: -2.35 to 0.27, p=0.12) with an I² of 94%. There were no significant effects on the risk of OAB (RR = 1.03, p=0.16) or UI (RR = 0.88, p=0.59), nor on UI improvement or worsening. The sensitivity analysis revealed that excluding one unusual study resulted in more consistent results and confirmed similar patterns.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>no substantial advantage of vitamin D was observed in UI or OAB patients compared to the control groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":46900,"journal":{"name":"Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia","volume":"97 3","pages":"14172"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2025.14172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: urinary incontinence (UI) and overactive bladder (OAB) are common lower urinary tract symptoms that significantly impact quality of life. Conventional pharmacologic treatments are often associated with side effects and limited efficacy, highlighting the need for alternative therapies. Vitamin D, known for its role in muscle function and its presence in the receptors of the bladder and prostate, has been proposed as a potential non-invasive intervention. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of vitamin D supplementation in the management of UI and OAB.

Methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Twelve studies (six RCTs and six cohort studies) were included. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Statistical analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.4. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) and risk ratios (RRs) were used to compare outcomes. A meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model, which was applied due to heterogeneity, as assessed by the I² statistic. Sensitivity analysis was performed using the leave-one-out method.

Results: no significant difference was found between the vitamin D and control groups in improving UI scales (SMD = -1.04; 95% CI: -2.35 to 0.27, p=0.12) with an I² of 94%. There were no significant effects on the risk of OAB (RR = 1.03, p=0.16) or UI (RR = 0.88, p=0.59), nor on UI improvement or worsening. The sensitivity analysis revealed that excluding one unusual study resulted in more consistent results and confirmed similar patterns.

Conclusions: no substantial advantage of vitamin D was observed in UI or OAB patients compared to the control groups.

补充维生素D治疗尿失禁和膀胱过度活动的有效性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景:尿失禁(UI)和膀胱过动症(OAB)是常见的下尿路症状,显著影响生活质量。传统的药物治疗往往伴随着副作用和有限的疗效,强调需要替代疗法。维生素D因其在肌肉功能中的作用以及存在于膀胱和前列腺的受体中而闻名,已被提议作为一种潜在的非侵入性干预措施。本研究旨在评价补充维生素D在治疗UI和OAB中的有效性。方法:根据PRISMA指南进行系统评价和荟萃分析。纳入了12项研究(6项随机对照试验和6项队列研究)。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)和Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估研究质量。使用Review Manager 5.4进行统计分析。标准化平均差异(SMDs)和风险比(rr)用于比较结果。采用随机效应模型进行meta分析,由于异质性,采用I²统计量进行评估。采用留一法进行敏感性分析。结果:维生素D组与对照组在改善UI量表方面无显著差异(SMD = -1.04; 95% CI: -2.35 ~ 0.27, p=0.12), I²为94%。对OAB (RR = 1.03, p=0.16)或UI (RR = 0.88, p=0.59)的风险无显著影响,对UI改善或恶化无显著影响。敏感性分析显示,排除一项不寻常的研究导致更一致的结果,并证实了相似的模式。结论:与对照组相比,在UI或OAB患者中没有观察到维生素D的实质性优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
35.70%
发文量
72
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信