Pre- and Post-Pandemic Trends in Emergency Medicine Resident Attrition

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Andrew R. Ketterer, Anne V. Grossestreuer, Jason J. Lewis
{"title":"Pre- and Post-Pandemic Trends in Emergency Medicine Resident Attrition","authors":"Andrew R. Ketterer,&nbsp;Anne V. Grossestreuer,&nbsp;Jason J. Lewis","doi":"10.1002/aet2.70089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Completion of EM residency is essential for the growth of the specialty and the strength of each residency program. Understanding resident attrition is paramount for program leadership and recruitment. We aimed to determine if there was a change in EM resident attrition rates after the COVID-19 pandemic. We also sought to determine whether residency attrition rates correlated to attending attrition rates or EM residency application numbers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This was a retrospective cross-sectional study of publicly available data from the ACGME Data Resource Book from 2013 to 2023, NRMP Results and Data from 2014 to 2024, and the Medicare Physician and Other Practitioners database. When comparing the proportions of attrition between residents and attendings by year, the attending rate from 2 years prior was used, as we hypothesized a lag between attending and resident attrition based on structural factors in residency application and employment. To test whether attrition rates followed a similar pattern over time, slopes between residents and attendings were compared by year using a linear regression. A similar method was used to compare yearly resident attrition rate to annual application rates.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Between 2014 and 2021, there was a general decline in EM resident attrition, followed by an increase in attrition in 2021–22. This pattern mirrored attending attrition rates with a two-year delay. Attending and resident attrition persisted at a higher-than-baseline rate in 2021 and the 2022–23 academic years, respectively. Lower-than-baseline application rates by these students persisted in the 2022–23 academic year, as did higher-than-baseline resident attrition rates.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>We found a spike in EM resident attrition for the 2021–22 academic year after a period of decline, mirroring trends in EM attending attrition, and an inverse correlation between EM residency application and attrition rates after 2021–22. Further studies are needed to elucidate the underlying factors determining resident attrition, attending attrition, and EM residency application.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":37032,"journal":{"name":"AEM Education and Training","volume":"9 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12476952/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AEM Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aet2.70089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Completion of EM residency is essential for the growth of the specialty and the strength of each residency program. Understanding resident attrition is paramount for program leadership and recruitment. We aimed to determine if there was a change in EM resident attrition rates after the COVID-19 pandemic. We also sought to determine whether residency attrition rates correlated to attending attrition rates or EM residency application numbers.

Methods

This was a retrospective cross-sectional study of publicly available data from the ACGME Data Resource Book from 2013 to 2023, NRMP Results and Data from 2014 to 2024, and the Medicare Physician and Other Practitioners database. When comparing the proportions of attrition between residents and attendings by year, the attending rate from 2 years prior was used, as we hypothesized a lag between attending and resident attrition based on structural factors in residency application and employment. To test whether attrition rates followed a similar pattern over time, slopes between residents and attendings were compared by year using a linear regression. A similar method was used to compare yearly resident attrition rate to annual application rates.

Results

Between 2014 and 2021, there was a general decline in EM resident attrition, followed by an increase in attrition in 2021–22. This pattern mirrored attending attrition rates with a two-year delay. Attending and resident attrition persisted at a higher-than-baseline rate in 2021 and the 2022–23 academic years, respectively. Lower-than-baseline application rates by these students persisted in the 2022–23 academic year, as did higher-than-baseline resident attrition rates.

Discussion

We found a spike in EM resident attrition for the 2021–22 academic year after a period of decline, mirroring trends in EM attending attrition, and an inverse correlation between EM residency application and attrition rates after 2021–22. Further studies are needed to elucidate the underlying factors determining resident attrition, attending attrition, and EM residency application.

Abstract Image

大流行前和大流行后急诊医学住院医师流失的趋势。
简介:完成EM住院医师培训对专业的发展和每个住院医师项目的实力至关重要。了解住院医生的流失对项目领导和招聘是至关重要的。我们的目的是确定COVID-19大流行后新兴市场居民流失率是否发生变化。我们还试图确定住院医师流失率是否与住院医师流失率或EM住院医师申请数量相关。方法:这是一项回顾性横断面研究,收集了2013年至2023年ACGME数据资源书、2014年至2024年NRMP结果和数据以及医疗保险医师和其他从业者数据库中的公开数据。当按年比较住院医师和主治医师之间的流失率时,我们使用了2年前的住院率,因为我们假设住院医师和住院医师之间的流失率存在滞后,这是基于住院医师申请和就业的结构性因素。为了测试流失率是否随着时间的推移遵循类似的模式,使用线性回归按年比较了住院医生和主治医生之间的斜率。一个类似的方法被用来比较年度居民流失率和年度申请率。结果:2014年至2021年间,新兴市场居民的流失率普遍下降,随后在2021年至2022年期间流失率上升。这种模式反映了两年后的流失率。在2021年和2022-23学年,参加和住院人员的流失率分别高于基线率。在2022-23学年,这些学生低于基线的申请率持续存在,居民流失率也高于基线。讨论:我们发现,在经历了一段时间的下降之后,新兴市场住院医师的流失率在2021-22学年出现了飙升,反映了新兴市场住院医师的流失率趋势,并且在2021-22学年之后,新兴市场住院医师申请与流失率之间呈负相关关系。需要进一步的研究来阐明决定住院人员流失、主治人员流失和EM住院申请的潜在因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AEM Education and Training
AEM Education and Training Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
22.20%
发文量
89
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信