Muhammad Asykar Palinrungi, Muhammad Faruk, Muhammad Rum Marewa, Andi Makkawaru Chairul, Ashy Amelia Arista, Nurnaningsi Thalib, Abdul Azis
{"title":"Comparison of novel dorsal buttonhole slit <i>versus</i> conventional dorsal slit circumcision: efficacy, safety, and parents' satisfaction.","authors":"Muhammad Asykar Palinrungi, Muhammad Faruk, Muhammad Rum Marewa, Andi Makkawaru Chairul, Ashy Amelia Arista, Nurnaningsi Thalib, Abdul Azis","doi":"10.4081/aiua.2025.13999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and objective: </strong>Circumcision is the most frequently performed surgical procedure worldwide. The World Health Organization recommends that circumcisions be performed by dorsal slit incision. This study introduces the dorsal buttonhole slit, a novel modification of the conventional dorsal slit technique, and aims to evaluate its clinical outcomes and safety in a pediatric cohort.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective descriptive study was conducted on 107 pediatric patients aged 1-10 years who underwent circumcision for religious reasons or phimosis between January 2022 and December 2023. Patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical technique used: dorsal buttonhole slit (n=56) vs conventional dorsal slit (n=51). The assessment parameters included intra-operative hemorrhage, operating time, healing time, postoperative complications, and parental satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean operative time was significantly shorter in the dorsal buttonhole slit group compared to the conventional group (293.79 vs 320.67 seconds, respectively; p=0.028). There was no significant difference in wound healing time between the two groups. No postoperative complications, such as hemorrhage or need for revision, were observed in any patient during the 1-month follow-up period. All parents reported satisfaction with the functional and cosmetic results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The dorsal buttonhole slit technique was associated with a shorter operative time and excellent safety outcomes. While these results are promising, prospective randomized trials are required to definitively confirm the efficacy and safety of this method. The technique shows potential as a reproducible and reliable alternative for pediatric circumcision.</p>","PeriodicalId":46900,"journal":{"name":"Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia","volume":"97 3","pages":"13999"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2025.13999","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction and objective: Circumcision is the most frequently performed surgical procedure worldwide. The World Health Organization recommends that circumcisions be performed by dorsal slit incision. This study introduces the dorsal buttonhole slit, a novel modification of the conventional dorsal slit technique, and aims to evaluate its clinical outcomes and safety in a pediatric cohort.
Materials and methods: This retrospective descriptive study was conducted on 107 pediatric patients aged 1-10 years who underwent circumcision for religious reasons or phimosis between January 2022 and December 2023. Patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical technique used: dorsal buttonhole slit (n=56) vs conventional dorsal slit (n=51). The assessment parameters included intra-operative hemorrhage, operating time, healing time, postoperative complications, and parental satisfaction.
Results: The mean operative time was significantly shorter in the dorsal buttonhole slit group compared to the conventional group (293.79 vs 320.67 seconds, respectively; p=0.028). There was no significant difference in wound healing time between the two groups. No postoperative complications, such as hemorrhage or need for revision, were observed in any patient during the 1-month follow-up period. All parents reported satisfaction with the functional and cosmetic results.
Conclusions: The dorsal buttonhole slit technique was associated with a shorter operative time and excellent safety outcomes. While these results are promising, prospective randomized trials are required to definitively confirm the efficacy and safety of this method. The technique shows potential as a reproducible and reliable alternative for pediatric circumcision.
简介和目的:包皮环切术是世界上最常用的外科手术。世界卫生组织建议采用背侧切口进行包皮环切。本研究介绍了一种对传统的背缝技术进行改进的背缝技术,旨在评估其在儿童队列中的临床效果和安全性。材料和方法:本回顾性描述性研究对2022年1月至2023年12月期间因宗教原因或包茎原因行包皮环切术的107例1-10岁儿童患者进行了研究。根据采用的手术技术将患者分为两组:背侧扣眼切口(n=56)和常规背侧切口(n=51)。评估参数包括术中出血、手术时间、愈合时间、术后并发症、家长满意度。结果:背扣孔开缝组平均手术时间明显短于常规组(293.79 vs 320.67秒,p=0.028)。两组患者伤口愈合时间差异无统计学意义。在1个月的随访期间,所有患者均未观察到术后并发症,如出血或需要翻修。所有的家长都对手术的功能和美容效果表示满意。结论:背侧扣眼开缝术手术时间短,安全性好。虽然这些结果是有希望的,但需要前瞻性随机试验来明确证实这种方法的有效性和安全性。该技术显示了作为一种可重复和可靠的替代儿科包皮环切术的潜力。