Unqueering the Double Helix: Conversion Therapists, the "Gay Gene," and Culture Wars in the United States.

IF 3.9 3区 工程技术 Q2 BIOLOGY
Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine Pub Date : 2025-09-30 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.59249/YADT3005
Chris Babits
{"title":"Unqueering the Double Helix: Conversion Therapists, the \"Gay Gene,\" and Culture Wars in the United States.","authors":"Chris Babits","doi":"10.59249/YADT3005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 1993, geneticist Dean Hamer and his colleagues published a groundbreaking study suggesting that a region on the X chromosome-Xq28-might be linked to male homosexuality. Widely covered in the press and championed by LGBTQ rights advocates, the study lent scientific weight to the argument that sexual orientation is biologically rooted rather than solely the product of psychosexual developmental failure. This posed a significant threat to the cultural authority of conversion therapists, who had long relied on psychoanalytic frameworks that pathologized same-sex desire as a \"curable\" condition. In response, conversion therapists launched a coordinated counteroffensive, rejecting the emerging biological evidence about homosexuality and doubling down on psychodynamic theories about same-sex desire developed in the mid-20th century. This article argues that the publication of Hamer's research drew conversion therapists into the heart of the United States' culture wars, where they forged interfaith political coalitions and constructed alternative knowledge-production networks to preserve the plausibility of sexual reorientation. Their opposition to genetic research was more than scientific skepticism; it was a strategic political effort to defend heteronormativity, enforce rigid gender roles, and delegitimize queer and trans identities. By tracing how conversion therapists selectively engaged with emerging scientific discourses around LGBTQ individuals being \"born that way,\" this article reveals how marginalized actors helped shape-and distort-the boundaries of scientific authority in service of a broader anti-queer agenda.</p>","PeriodicalId":48617,"journal":{"name":"Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine","volume":"98 3","pages":"259-271"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12466298/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59249/YADT3005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 1993, geneticist Dean Hamer and his colleagues published a groundbreaking study suggesting that a region on the X chromosome-Xq28-might be linked to male homosexuality. Widely covered in the press and championed by LGBTQ rights advocates, the study lent scientific weight to the argument that sexual orientation is biologically rooted rather than solely the product of psychosexual developmental failure. This posed a significant threat to the cultural authority of conversion therapists, who had long relied on psychoanalytic frameworks that pathologized same-sex desire as a "curable" condition. In response, conversion therapists launched a coordinated counteroffensive, rejecting the emerging biological evidence about homosexuality and doubling down on psychodynamic theories about same-sex desire developed in the mid-20th century. This article argues that the publication of Hamer's research drew conversion therapists into the heart of the United States' culture wars, where they forged interfaith political coalitions and constructed alternative knowledge-production networks to preserve the plausibility of sexual reorientation. Their opposition to genetic research was more than scientific skepticism; it was a strategic political effort to defend heteronormativity, enforce rigid gender roles, and delegitimize queer and trans identities. By tracing how conversion therapists selectively engaged with emerging scientific discourses around LGBTQ individuals being "born that way," this article reveals how marginalized actors helped shape-and distort-the boundaries of scientific authority in service of a broader anti-queer agenda.

解开双螺旋:转换治疗师、“同性恋基因”和美国的文化战争。
1993年,遗传学家迪恩·哈默(Dean Hamer)和他的同事发表了一项开创性的研究,表明X染色体上的一个区域xq28可能与男性同性恋有关。这项研究被媒体广泛报道,并得到了LGBTQ权利倡导者的支持,它为以下观点提供了科学依据:性取向是生物学根源,而不仅仅是性心理发展失败的产物。这对转换治疗师的文化权威构成了重大威胁,他们长期依赖精神分析框架,将同性欲望病态化为一种“可治愈”的状况。作为回应,转化治疗师发起了一场协调一致的反攻,拒绝接受关于同性恋的新生物学证据,并加倍重视20世纪中期发展起来的关于同性欲望的心理动力学理论。这篇文章认为,哈默尔的研究成果的发表将性取向转换治疗师拉入了美国文化战争的中心,他们在那里建立了不同信仰的政治联盟,构建了不同的知识生产网络,以保持性取向转换的可行性。他们对基因研究的反对不仅仅是对科学的怀疑;这是一项战略性的政治努力,旨在捍卫异性恋规范,强化严格的性别角色,并使酷儿和跨性别身份合法化。通过追踪转化治疗师如何选择性地参与围绕LGBTQ个体“生来如此”的新兴科学论述,这篇文章揭示了被边缘化的行动者如何帮助塑造和扭曲科学权威的界限,以服务于更广泛的反酷儿议程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine
Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-General Biochemistry,Genetics and Molecular Biology
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine (YJBM) is a graduate and medical student-run, peer-reviewed, open-access journal dedicated to the publication of original research articles, scientific reviews, articles on medical history, personal perspectives on medicine, policy analyses, case reports, and symposia related to biomedical matters. YJBM is published quarterly and aims to publish articles of interest to both physicians and scientists. YJBM is and has been an internationally distributed journal with a long history of landmark articles. Our contributors feature a notable list of philosophers, statesmen, scientists, and physicians, including Ernst Cassirer, Harvey Cushing, Rene Dubos, Edward Kennedy, Donald Seldin, and Jack Strominger. Our Editorial Board consists of students and faculty members from Yale School of Medicine and Yale University Graduate School of Arts & Sciences. All manuscripts submitted to YJBM are first evaluated on the basis of scientific quality, originality, appropriateness, contribution to the field, and style. Suitable manuscripts are then subject to rigorous, fair, and rapid peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信