{"title":"Invisible Black Women: Medical Bias and the Silencing of Enslaved Black Women in 18th- and 19th-Century British West Indian Medical Discourse.","authors":"Vicki M Richardson","doi":"10.59249/PVVB2237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article examines the historical roots of medical neglect experienced by Black women, focusing on the 18th- and 19th-century British West Indies. During this period, White male physicians constructed racialized and gendered frameworks of disease that excluded enslaved Black women from diagnosis, care, and medical legitimacy. Positioned not as patients but as reproducers and laborers, their suffering was either pathologized or dismissed. Drawing on medical treatises and plantation manuals, this article argues that enslaved Black women were relegated to a space of medical liminality: recognized as reproductive laborers but denied clinical legitimacy or voice. It advances three key arguments. First, it explores how physicians framed Black women as morally deficient and biologically inferior, blaming their behavior for illness. Second, it shows how reproductive outcomes like miscarriage and abortion were weaponized to portray Black women as lacking maternal instinct. Third, it examines how female-only diagnoses, such as <i>Chlorosis</i>, excluded Black enslaved women, even when they presented similar symptoms. Instead, they were assigned stigmatized conditions, like \"dirt-eating,\" reinforcing assumptions of biological difference and unworthiness of care. By tracing this history, the article reveals the foundations of contemporary racial disparities in women's healthcare. It concludes by linking these colonial ideologies to current maternal health outcomes, where Black women in the United States still face disproportionate rates of medical dismissal and death. This legacy underscores the urgent need to confront the historical frameworks that continue to shape how Black women are treated in medicine today.</p>","PeriodicalId":48617,"journal":{"name":"Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine","volume":"98 3","pages":"273-283"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12466277/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59249/PVVB2237","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article examines the historical roots of medical neglect experienced by Black women, focusing on the 18th- and 19th-century British West Indies. During this period, White male physicians constructed racialized and gendered frameworks of disease that excluded enslaved Black women from diagnosis, care, and medical legitimacy. Positioned not as patients but as reproducers and laborers, their suffering was either pathologized or dismissed. Drawing on medical treatises and plantation manuals, this article argues that enslaved Black women were relegated to a space of medical liminality: recognized as reproductive laborers but denied clinical legitimacy or voice. It advances three key arguments. First, it explores how physicians framed Black women as morally deficient and biologically inferior, blaming their behavior for illness. Second, it shows how reproductive outcomes like miscarriage and abortion were weaponized to portray Black women as lacking maternal instinct. Third, it examines how female-only diagnoses, such as Chlorosis, excluded Black enslaved women, even when they presented similar symptoms. Instead, they were assigned stigmatized conditions, like "dirt-eating," reinforcing assumptions of biological difference and unworthiness of care. By tracing this history, the article reveals the foundations of contemporary racial disparities in women's healthcare. It concludes by linking these colonial ideologies to current maternal health outcomes, where Black women in the United States still face disproportionate rates of medical dismissal and death. This legacy underscores the urgent need to confront the historical frameworks that continue to shape how Black women are treated in medicine today.
期刊介绍:
The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine (YJBM) is a graduate and medical student-run, peer-reviewed, open-access journal dedicated to the publication of original research articles, scientific reviews, articles on medical history, personal perspectives on medicine, policy analyses, case reports, and symposia related to biomedical matters. YJBM is published quarterly and aims to publish articles of interest to both physicians and scientists. YJBM is and has been an internationally distributed journal with a long history of landmark articles. Our contributors feature a notable list of philosophers, statesmen, scientists, and physicians, including Ernst Cassirer, Harvey Cushing, Rene Dubos, Edward Kennedy, Donald Seldin, and Jack Strominger. Our Editorial Board consists of students and faculty members from Yale School of Medicine and Yale University Graduate School of Arts & Sciences. All manuscripts submitted to YJBM are first evaluated on the basis of scientific quality, originality, appropriateness, contribution to the field, and style. Suitable manuscripts are then subject to rigorous, fair, and rapid peer review.