Smartphone-Based Mindfulness and Mentalization Ecological Momentary Interventions for Common Mental Health Problems: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 5.8 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Jmir Mental Health Pub Date : 2025-09-30 DOI:10.2196/79296
Ciarán O'Driscoll, Sarah O'Reilly, Agata Julita Jaremba, Tobias Nolte, Madiha Shaikh
{"title":"Smartphone-Based Mindfulness and Mentalization Ecological Momentary Interventions for Common Mental Health Problems: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Ciarán O'Driscoll, Sarah O'Reilly, Agata Julita Jaremba, Tobias Nolte, Madiha Shaikh","doi":"10.2196/79296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accessible ecological momentary interventions deliver brief, real-time support integrated into daily routines. Interpersonal dynamics and maladaptive coping mechanisms can contribute to an individual's anxiety and depression. Both mindfulness and mentalization represent psychological constructs with the potential to mitigate the negative impact of interpersonal stressors.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to assess the feasibility and acceptability of an automated mindfulness- and mentalization-based ecological momentary intervention for common mental health problems as delivered via a mobile phone app.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The design was a parallel-group pilot randomized controlled trial with 1:1 allocation ratio and exploratory framework. Recruitment of participants experiencing common mental health issues was internet-based from a university setting. Eligible participants were randomly allocated to fully automated mindfulness- or mentalization-based ecological momentary interventions via computer-generated randomization. Participants were blind to the alternative intervention options. Outcomes were self-assessed through questionnaires after 4 weeks. Primary outcomes were feasibility (recruitment, retention, and adherence) and acceptability (satisfaction ratings and qualitative feedback). Secondary outcomes included changes in depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9]) and anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire-7 [GAD-7]) scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 84 participants were randomized (42 to each group). The interventions demonstrated good feasibility with an 89.2% retention rate and a mean adherence of 87.69% (SD 11.3%) across both groups. Acceptability ratings were positive, with favorable scores for ease of engagement (mean 5.20, SD 1.6), overall enjoyment (mean 5.15, SD 1.2), and likelihood of recommending the app (mean 5.11, SD 1.6) on a 7-point scale. For primary outcomes, both groups showed significant within-group reductions in PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores, with moderate to large effect sizes (Cohen d=-0.68 to -0.81), with no significant difference between groups. Both treatments demonstrated clinically significant change, with 33 (44%) participants in both groups no longer meeting caseness criteria for anxiety and depression. Mindfulness performed better on improving assertiveness and perceived support compared to mentalization in the ecological momentary assessment data. One unintended harm was reported in the mindfulness arm, whereas none was reported in the mentalization arm.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This pilot trial suggests that both mindfulness- and mentalization-based ecological momentary interventions are feasible and acceptable for individuals with common mental health problems and warrant further evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48616,"journal":{"name":"Jmir Mental Health","volume":"12 ","pages":"e79296"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12483342/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jmir Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/79296","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Accessible ecological momentary interventions deliver brief, real-time support integrated into daily routines. Interpersonal dynamics and maladaptive coping mechanisms can contribute to an individual's anxiety and depression. Both mindfulness and mentalization represent psychological constructs with the potential to mitigate the negative impact of interpersonal stressors.

Objective: This study aims to assess the feasibility and acceptability of an automated mindfulness- and mentalization-based ecological momentary intervention for common mental health problems as delivered via a mobile phone app.

Methods: The design was a parallel-group pilot randomized controlled trial with 1:1 allocation ratio and exploratory framework. Recruitment of participants experiencing common mental health issues was internet-based from a university setting. Eligible participants were randomly allocated to fully automated mindfulness- or mentalization-based ecological momentary interventions via computer-generated randomization. Participants were blind to the alternative intervention options. Outcomes were self-assessed through questionnaires after 4 weeks. Primary outcomes were feasibility (recruitment, retention, and adherence) and acceptability (satisfaction ratings and qualitative feedback). Secondary outcomes included changes in depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9]) and anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire-7 [GAD-7]) scores.

Results: A total of 84 participants were randomized (42 to each group). The interventions demonstrated good feasibility with an 89.2% retention rate and a mean adherence of 87.69% (SD 11.3%) across both groups. Acceptability ratings were positive, with favorable scores for ease of engagement (mean 5.20, SD 1.6), overall enjoyment (mean 5.15, SD 1.2), and likelihood of recommending the app (mean 5.11, SD 1.6) on a 7-point scale. For primary outcomes, both groups showed significant within-group reductions in PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores, with moderate to large effect sizes (Cohen d=-0.68 to -0.81), with no significant difference between groups. Both treatments demonstrated clinically significant change, with 33 (44%) participants in both groups no longer meeting caseness criteria for anxiety and depression. Mindfulness performed better on improving assertiveness and perceived support compared to mentalization in the ecological momentary assessment data. One unintended harm was reported in the mindfulness arm, whereas none was reported in the mentalization arm.

Conclusions: This pilot trial suggests that both mindfulness- and mentalization-based ecological momentary interventions are feasible and acceptable for individuals with common mental health problems and warrant further evaluation.

基于智能手机的正念和心理化生态瞬时干预对常见心理健康问题:试点随机对照试验。
背景:可获得的生态瞬时干预提供了融入日常生活的简短、实时的支持。人际关系动态和适应不良的应对机制会导致个体的焦虑和抑郁。正念和心智化都是具有减轻人际压力源负面影响潜力的心理构念。目的:本研究旨在评估一种基于正念和心理化的手机应用程序对常见心理健康问题的自动生态瞬时干预的可行性和可接受性。方法:采用1:1分配比例的平行组随机对照试验设计,采用探索性框架。在大学背景下,以互联网为基础招募有常见心理健康问题的参与者。合格的参与者被随机分配到完全自动化的正念或基于心理的生态瞬间干预,通过计算机生成的随机化。参与者对其他干预方案一无所知。4周后通过问卷自评结果。主要结果是可行性(招募、保留和坚持)和可接受性(满意度评分和定性反馈)。次要结局包括抑郁(患者健康问卷-9 [PHQ-9])和焦虑(广泛性焦虑障碍问卷-7 [GAD-7])得分的变化。结果:84例受试者被随机分组,每组42例。两组干预均显示出良好的可行性,保留率为89.2%,平均依从性为87.69% (SD 11.3%)。可接受性评分是积极的,在7分制中,易用性(平均5.20,SD 1.6),整体享受(平均5.15,SD 1.2)和推荐应用的可能性(平均5.11,SD 1.6)得分较高。对于主要结局,两组均显示PHQ-9和GAD-7评分在组内显著降低,具有中等到较大的效应量(Cohen d=-0.68至-0.81),组间无显著差异。两种治疗都显示出显著的临床变化,两组中33名(44%)参与者不再符合焦虑和抑郁的病例标准。在生态瞬间评估数据中,正念对自信和感知支持的改善优于心理化。正念组报告了一个意外伤害,而心智化组没有报告。结论:该试点试验表明,对于有常见心理健康问题的个体,基于正念和基于心理的生态瞬时干预都是可行和可接受的,值得进一步评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Jmir Mental Health
Jmir Mental Health Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
104
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JMIR Mental Health (JMH, ISSN 2368-7959) is a PubMed-indexed, peer-reviewed sister journal of JMIR, the leading eHealth journal (Impact Factor 2016: 5.175). JMIR Mental Health focusses on digital health and Internet interventions, technologies and electronic innovations (software and hardware) for mental health, addictions, online counselling and behaviour change. This includes formative evaluation and system descriptions, theoretical papers, review papers, viewpoint/vision papers, and rigorous evaluations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信