[Escalation and de-escalation of therapy for high-risk melanomas].

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Reinhard Dummer, Lara Valeska Maul, Egle Ramelyte, Joanna Mangana
{"title":"[Escalation and de-escalation of therapy for high-risk melanomas].","authors":"Reinhard Dummer, Lara Valeska Maul, Egle Ramelyte, Joanna Mangana","doi":"10.23785/TU.2025.04.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>For a long time, advanced melanoma was a difficult-to-treat disease with no effective survival strategies. With the development of checkpoint inhibitors and kinase inhibitors in the 21st century, treatment options have improved considerably. Recent studies indicate that adjuvant therapy with anti-PD1-antibodies significantly improves the recurrence-free survival in stage IIB/C patients without lymph node involvement. However, the challenge is to identify the right patients for long-term treatment, as many could be cured by surgery alone. Neoadjuvant therapy, in which systemic treatment is administered before the surgical removal of the macroscopic lymph node metastases, has proven to be promising. Neoadjuvant approaches, particularly with anti-PD1-antibodies, can significantly reduce the recurrence rate. Additionally, histological analysis of tumor tissue after neoadjuvant therapy could help identify patients who do not require further adjuvant treatment, thereby reducing side effects and costs. However, the implementation of neoadjuvant therapy in clinical practice faces challenges, such as the lack of approval in Switzerland and the need for specialized histopathological assessments. Future research efforts should focus on developing criteria for patient selection and validating the role of histopathological examinations in prognosis. A de-escalation of therapeutic approaches could lead to more patient-centered, resource-efficient medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":44874,"journal":{"name":"THERAPEUTISCHE UMSCHAU","volume":"82 4","pages":"135-137"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THERAPEUTISCHE UMSCHAU","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23785/TU.2025.04.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: For a long time, advanced melanoma was a difficult-to-treat disease with no effective survival strategies. With the development of checkpoint inhibitors and kinase inhibitors in the 21st century, treatment options have improved considerably. Recent studies indicate that adjuvant therapy with anti-PD1-antibodies significantly improves the recurrence-free survival in stage IIB/C patients without lymph node involvement. However, the challenge is to identify the right patients for long-term treatment, as many could be cured by surgery alone. Neoadjuvant therapy, in which systemic treatment is administered before the surgical removal of the macroscopic lymph node metastases, has proven to be promising. Neoadjuvant approaches, particularly with anti-PD1-antibodies, can significantly reduce the recurrence rate. Additionally, histological analysis of tumor tissue after neoadjuvant therapy could help identify patients who do not require further adjuvant treatment, thereby reducing side effects and costs. However, the implementation of neoadjuvant therapy in clinical practice faces challenges, such as the lack of approval in Switzerland and the need for specialized histopathological assessments. Future research efforts should focus on developing criteria for patient selection and validating the role of histopathological examinations in prognosis. A de-escalation of therapeutic approaches could lead to more patient-centered, resource-efficient medicine.

[高危黑色素瘤的升级和降级治疗]。
长期以来,晚期黑色素瘤是一种难以治疗的疾病,没有有效的生存策略。随着检查点抑制剂和激酶抑制剂在21世纪的发展,治疗选择有了很大的改善。最近的研究表明,抗pd1抗体辅助治疗可显著提高无淋巴结累及的IIB/C期患者的无复发生存率。然而,挑战在于确定合适的患者进行长期治疗,因为许多患者可以仅通过手术治愈。新辅助治疗,在手术切除肉眼可见的淋巴结转移瘤之前进行全身治疗,已被证明是有希望的。新辅助方法,特别是抗pd1抗体,可以显著降低复发率。此外,新辅助治疗后肿瘤组织的组织学分析可以帮助确定不需要进一步辅助治疗的患者,从而减少副作用和成本。然而,在临床实践中实施新辅助治疗面临着挑战,例如在瑞士缺乏批准以及需要专门的组织病理学评估。未来的研究工作应集中在制定患者选择标准和验证组织病理学检查在预后中的作用。治疗方法的降级可能会导致更多以患者为中心、资源高效的医学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
THERAPEUTISCHE UMSCHAU
THERAPEUTISCHE UMSCHAU MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: Monat für Monat ein aktuelles Thema der praktischen Medizin - als Sammlung ein hochaktuelles Nachschlagewerk.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信