The freedom to believe in free will: Evidence from an adoption study against the first law of behavioral genetics.

IF 2.1 3区 哲学 Q2 ETHICS
Emily A Willoughby, Alan Love, Matt McGue, Tobias Edwards, Alexandros Giannelis, James J Lee
{"title":"The freedom to believe in free will: Evidence from an adoption study against the first law of behavioral genetics.","authors":"Emily A Willoughby, Alan Love, Matt McGue, Tobias Edwards, Alexandros Giannelis, James J Lee","doi":"10.1080/09515089.2025.2533519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Philosophers and psychologists alike have long debated the etiology of beliefs about human agency. Recently, empirical investigations have shown that lay beliefs about free will and determinism represent stable and important individual differences. Despite a perennial interest in the sources of agentic belief, genetic and environmental influences on such beliefs have never been studied. We administered a battery of items assessing these beliefs to a unique sample of 394 adoptive and biological families with adult offspring to investigate the origins of agentic beliefs and their relationships. We found significant differences between adopted and biological offspring and between the parents of such children, particularly in beliefs about determinism. Biometric modeling revealed especially surprising results: unlike the vast majority of traits studied in family designs, agentic beliefs appear to be weakly or not at all heritable. Since genetic factors might be regarded as typical of the \"initial conditions\" in philosophical thought experiments about free will and determinism, it is especially ironic that beliefs about free will and determinism may be among the traits least influenced by genetic differences.</p>","PeriodicalId":47485,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12478530/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2025.2533519","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Philosophers and psychologists alike have long debated the etiology of beliefs about human agency. Recently, empirical investigations have shown that lay beliefs about free will and determinism represent stable and important individual differences. Despite a perennial interest in the sources of agentic belief, genetic and environmental influences on such beliefs have never been studied. We administered a battery of items assessing these beliefs to a unique sample of 394 adoptive and biological families with adult offspring to investigate the origins of agentic beliefs and their relationships. We found significant differences between adopted and biological offspring and between the parents of such children, particularly in beliefs about determinism. Biometric modeling revealed especially surprising results: unlike the vast majority of traits studied in family designs, agentic beliefs appear to be weakly or not at all heritable. Since genetic factors might be regarded as typical of the "initial conditions" in philosophical thought experiments about free will and determinism, it is especially ironic that beliefs about free will and determinism may be among the traits least influenced by genetic differences.

相信自由意志的自由:来自一项反对行为遗传学第一定律的收养研究的证据。
哲学家和心理学家长期以来一直在争论人类能动性信念的病因。最近的实证研究表明,外行对自由意志和决定论的信仰表现出稳定而重要的个体差异。尽管人们对主观信念的来源一直很感兴趣,但基因和环境对这种信念的影响从未被研究过。我们对394个有成年子女的收养家庭和亲生家庭的独特样本进行了一系列评估这些信念的项目,以调查代理信念的起源及其关系。我们发现收养和亲生子女之间以及这些子女的父母之间存在显著差异,特别是在对决定论的信念方面。生物识别模型揭示了特别令人惊讶的结果:与在家庭设计中研究的绝大多数特征不同,代理信念似乎很弱,或者根本没有遗传。由于遗传因素可能被视为关于自由意志和决定论的哲学思想实验中典型的“初始条件”,尤其具有讽刺意味的是,关于自由意志和决定论的信念可能是受遗传差异影响最小的特征之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
120
期刊介绍: Philosophical Psychology is an international journal devoted to developing and strengthening the links between philosophy and the psychological sciences, both as basic sciences and as employed in applied settings, by publishing original, peer-refereed contributions to this expanding field of study and research. Published articles deal with issues that arise in the cognitive and brain sciences, and in areas of applied psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信