Association Between Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Insulin Resistance in Cancer Survivors: A Cross-Sectional Study Based on the NHANES 2005 - 2018.

IF 2.2 Q3 ONCOLOGY
World Journal of Oncology Pub Date : 2025-08-07 eCollection Date: 2025-10-01 DOI:10.14740/wjon2603
Jiao Wang, Tao Li
{"title":"Association Between Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Insulin Resistance in Cancer Survivors: A Cross-Sectional Study Based on the NHANES 2005 - 2018.","authors":"Jiao Wang, Tao Li","doi":"10.14740/wjon2603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The incidence of insulin resistance (IR) among cancer survivors is significantly higher than that in the general population. Current diagnostic methods for IR are complex, often requiring fasting blood samples, specialized laboratory tests, and sometimes invasive procedures, which limit their routine clinical application. This study investigated the association between platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), a readily available marker from routine blood tests, and IR in cancer survivors, aiming to find a more straightforward predictor of IR that could potentially simplify screening and monitoring processes in this high-risk population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study analyzed data from 1,418 cancer survivors from the NHANES 2005-2018 database. IR was assessed by three indicators: homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI), and the triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine the relationship between PLR quartiles and IR, with restricted cubic spline (RCS) analyses to evaluate non-linear relationships. Covariates included demographic (age, gender, race/ethnicity), socioeconomic (marital status, education, family poverty income ratio), lifestyle (smoking status, alcohol consumption, sleep duration, physical activity) and health status variables (body mass index (BMI), history of cardiovascular disease, hypertension status). Subgroup analyses were conducted to identify sensitive populations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 1,418 cancer survivors (weighted population: 20,233,847; median age 69.0 years; 58.4% female) with low HOMA-IR (< 2.5), high QUICKI (≥ 0.33) and low TyG index (< 4.68) demonstrated more favorable metabolic profiles, including lower PLR values, better socioeconomic status, better lifestyle, and lower chronic disease burden. Compared to the lowest PLR quartile (Q1), individuals in the highest quartile (Q4) showed significantly increased IR risk when assessed by QUICKI (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.61, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02 - 2.53, P = 0.040) and the TyG index (HR = 1.56, 95% CI: 1.02 - 2.45, P = 0.035). Each increment in PLR quartile was associated with a 19% (QUICKI) and 15% (TyG) increased risk of IR. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis results indicated that PLR cutoff values in the range of 124 - 137 can serve as screening thresholds for IR in cancer survivors. In the subgroup analysis, the PLR and IR showed no significant interaction across all examined subgroup characteristics in both the HOMA-IR and QUICKI models (P > 0.05). However, in the TyG index model, individuals in the Q4 compared to the Q1 demonstrated greater susceptibility to IR in those with physical activity < 600 metabolic equivalent of task (MET)-mins/week (odds ratio (OR) = 2.28, 95% CI: 1.12 - 4.61); and those with a history of hypertension (OR = 1.95, 95% CI: 1.05 - 3.63), with P values for interaction of 0.007 and 0.036, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Higher PLR levels indicated a significantly increased risk of IR in cancer survivors, especially when assessed by QUICKI and the TyG index. This relationship showed no significant interaction between subgroups in the HOMA-IR and QUICKI models, but in the TyG index model, and the association was more pronounced among individuals with low physical activity and those with a history of hypertension. As a simple, cost-effective biomarker derived from routine blood tests, PLR offers potential clinical value for the assessment of IR risk in cancer survivors, especially in high-risk subgroups.</p>","PeriodicalId":46797,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Oncology","volume":"16 5","pages":"509-524"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12479085/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14740/wjon2603","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The incidence of insulin resistance (IR) among cancer survivors is significantly higher than that in the general population. Current diagnostic methods for IR are complex, often requiring fasting blood samples, specialized laboratory tests, and sometimes invasive procedures, which limit their routine clinical application. This study investigated the association between platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), a readily available marker from routine blood tests, and IR in cancer survivors, aiming to find a more straightforward predictor of IR that could potentially simplify screening and monitoring processes in this high-risk population.

Methods: This cross-sectional study analyzed data from 1,418 cancer survivors from the NHANES 2005-2018 database. IR was assessed by three indicators: homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI), and the triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine the relationship between PLR quartiles and IR, with restricted cubic spline (RCS) analyses to evaluate non-linear relationships. Covariates included demographic (age, gender, race/ethnicity), socioeconomic (marital status, education, family poverty income ratio), lifestyle (smoking status, alcohol consumption, sleep duration, physical activity) and health status variables (body mass index (BMI), history of cardiovascular disease, hypertension status). Subgroup analyses were conducted to identify sensitive populations.

Results: The 1,418 cancer survivors (weighted population: 20,233,847; median age 69.0 years; 58.4% female) with low HOMA-IR (< 2.5), high QUICKI (≥ 0.33) and low TyG index (< 4.68) demonstrated more favorable metabolic profiles, including lower PLR values, better socioeconomic status, better lifestyle, and lower chronic disease burden. Compared to the lowest PLR quartile (Q1), individuals in the highest quartile (Q4) showed significantly increased IR risk when assessed by QUICKI (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.61, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02 - 2.53, P = 0.040) and the TyG index (HR = 1.56, 95% CI: 1.02 - 2.45, P = 0.035). Each increment in PLR quartile was associated with a 19% (QUICKI) and 15% (TyG) increased risk of IR. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis results indicated that PLR cutoff values in the range of 124 - 137 can serve as screening thresholds for IR in cancer survivors. In the subgroup analysis, the PLR and IR showed no significant interaction across all examined subgroup characteristics in both the HOMA-IR and QUICKI models (P > 0.05). However, in the TyG index model, individuals in the Q4 compared to the Q1 demonstrated greater susceptibility to IR in those with physical activity < 600 metabolic equivalent of task (MET)-mins/week (odds ratio (OR) = 2.28, 95% CI: 1.12 - 4.61); and those with a history of hypertension (OR = 1.95, 95% CI: 1.05 - 3.63), with P values for interaction of 0.007 and 0.036, respectively.

Conclusions: Higher PLR levels indicated a significantly increased risk of IR in cancer survivors, especially when assessed by QUICKI and the TyG index. This relationship showed no significant interaction between subgroups in the HOMA-IR and QUICKI models, but in the TyG index model, and the association was more pronounced among individuals with low physical activity and those with a history of hypertension. As a simple, cost-effective biomarker derived from routine blood tests, PLR offers potential clinical value for the assessment of IR risk in cancer survivors, especially in high-risk subgroups.

癌症幸存者血小板与淋巴细胞比率与胰岛素抵抗之间的关系:基于NHANES 2005 - 2018的横断面研究
背景:癌症幸存者中胰岛素抵抗(IR)的发生率明显高于普通人群。目前的IR诊断方法很复杂,通常需要空腹采血、专门的实验室检查,有时还需要侵入性手术,这限制了它们的常规临床应用。本研究调查了血小板与淋巴细胞比率(PLR)(常规血液检查中容易获得的标志物)与癌症幸存者IR之间的关系,旨在找到一种更直接的IR预测因子,可能简化这一高危人群的筛查和监测过程。方法:本横断面研究分析了NHANES 2005-2018数据库中1418名癌症幸存者的数据。IR通过胰岛素抵抗稳态模型评估(HOMA-IR)、胰岛素敏感性定量检查指数(QUICKI)和甘油三酯-葡萄糖(TyG)指数三个指标进行评估。采用多变量logistic回归模型检验PLR四分位数与IR之间的关系,并采用限制性三次样条(RCS)分析来评估非线性关系。协变量包括人口统计学(年龄、性别、种族/民族)、社会经济(婚姻状况、教育程度、家庭贫困收入比)、生活方式(吸烟状况、饮酒、睡眠时间、体育活动)和健康状况变量(身体质量指数(BMI)、心血管疾病史、高血压状况)。进行亚组分析以确定敏感人群。结果:1418例具有低HOMA-IR(< 2.5)、高QUICKI(≥0.33)和低TyG指数(< 4.68)的癌症幸存者(加权人群:20,233,847,中位年龄69.0岁,58.4%为女性)表现出更有利的代谢特征,包括更低的PLR值、更好的社会经济地位、更好的生活方式和更低的慢性疾病负担。与最低PLR四分位数(Q1)相比,最高四分位数(Q4)的个体在QUICKI(风险比(HR) = 1.61, 95%可信区间(CI): 1.02 - 2.53, P = 0.040)和TyG指数(HR = 1.56, 95% CI: 1.02 - 2.45, P = 0.035)评估时显示IR风险显著增加。PLR的每增加四分位数与IR风险增加19% (QUICKI)和15% (TyG)相关。受试者工作特征(ROC)分析结果表明,PLR截止值在124 - 137范围内可作为癌症幸存者IR的筛查阈值。在亚组分析中,在HOMA-IR和QUICKI模型中,PLR和IR在所有检查的亚组特征中均未显示显著的相互作用(P < 0.05)。然而,在TyG指数模型中,与Q1相比,Q4个体在体力活动< 600代谢当量(MET)-分钟/周的个体中表现出更大的IR易感性(优势比(OR) = 2.28, 95% CI: 1.12 - 4.61);有高血压病史者(OR = 1.95, 95% CI: 1.05 ~ 3.63),相互作用的P值分别为0.007和0.036。结论:较高的PLR水平表明癌症幸存者发生IR的风险显著增加,特别是当使用QUICKI和TyG指数进行评估时。在HOMA-IR和QUICKI模型中,这一关系在亚组之间没有显著的相互作用,但在TyG指数模型中,这种关联在体力活动较少的个体和有高血压史的个体中更为明显。作为一种从常规血液检测中提取的简单、经济的生物标志物,PLR为评估癌症幸存者,特别是高危亚组的IR风险提供了潜在的临床价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
15.40%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: World Journal of Oncology, bimonthly, publishes original contributions describing basic research and clinical investigation of cancer, on the cellular, molecular, prevention, diagnosis, therapy and prognosis aspects. The submissions can be basic research or clinical investigation oriented. This journal welcomes those submissions focused on the clinical trials of new treatment modalities for cancer, and those submissions focused on molecular or cellular research of the oncology pathogenesis. Case reports submitted for consideration of publication should explore either a novel genomic event/description or a new safety signal from an oncolytic agent. The areas of interested manuscripts are these disciplines: tumor immunology and immunotherapy; cancer molecular pharmacology and chemotherapy; drug sensitivity and resistance; cancer epidemiology; clinical trials; cancer pathology; radiobiology and radiation oncology; solid tumor oncology; hematological malignancies; surgical oncology; pediatric oncology; molecular oncology and cancer genes; gene therapy; cancer endocrinology; cancer metastasis; prevention and diagnosis of cancer; other cancer related subjects. The types of manuscripts accepted are original article, review, editorial, short communication, case report, letter to the editor, book review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信