Analysis of Biopsy Modalities and Timeline for the Workup of Undiagnosed Lesions: Mayo Clinic Experience.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Joan M Irizarry-Alvarado, Nancy L Dawson, John P Fasolino, Karthik Ghosh, Elizabeth A Gilman, Ivana T Croghan, Steven W Ressler
{"title":"Analysis of Biopsy Modalities and Timeline for the Workup of Undiagnosed Lesions: Mayo Clinic Experience.","authors":"Joan M Irizarry-Alvarado, Nancy L Dawson, John P Fasolino, Karthik Ghosh, Elizabeth A Gilman, Ivana T Croghan, Steven W Ressler","doi":"10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Incidental lesions identified clinically or on imaging are diagnostically challenging. The workup for these lesions is not well established. We investigated diagnostic modalities used at our institutions for undiagnosed lesions and the timeline from intake to biopsy and resultant diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed data from all 3 Mayo Clinic sites (Arizona, Florida, and Minnesota) between November 1, 2018 and July 31, 2022. We evaluated the frequency of the biopsy technique used (if any) and how often the resultant diagnosis was malignant, benign, or inconclusive. The turnaround time from intake to biopsy and final diagnosis also was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 93 patients with an undiagnosed lesion, 54 (58%) underwent biopsy; most patients underwent a single biopsy (n = 42, 77%), and 12 (23%) had two or more biopsies. Unbiopsied patients were diagnosed as having benign lesions according to imaging or had follow-up imaging. Of the 54 patients biopsied, 38 (70%) biopsies were obtained via fine-needle aspiration. Biopsy results were malignant for 34 patients (63%), benign for 14 (26%), and inconclusive for six (11%). Most patients were seen within 9 days of their initial contact (69/93, 74%), underwent biopsy within 20 days of seeing the physician (40/54, 74%), and had a final diagnosis within 30 days of the initial visit (72/93, 77%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings can help clinicians dispel the misconception that most undiagnosed lesions are malignant. Our findings also may help clinicians determine the appropriate workup for undiagnosed lesions. Further research is recommended to guide clinicians on the best sampling methodologies to obtain the highest yield of tissue for analysis. Dedicated patient workflows can help expedite diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":22043,"journal":{"name":"Southern Medical Journal","volume":"118 9","pages":"596-601"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001868","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Incidental lesions identified clinically or on imaging are diagnostically challenging. The workup for these lesions is not well established. We investigated diagnostic modalities used at our institutions for undiagnosed lesions and the timeline from intake to biopsy and resultant diagnoses.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from all 3 Mayo Clinic sites (Arizona, Florida, and Minnesota) between November 1, 2018 and July 31, 2022. We evaluated the frequency of the biopsy technique used (if any) and how often the resultant diagnosis was malignant, benign, or inconclusive. The turnaround time from intake to biopsy and final diagnosis also was evaluated.

Results: Of 93 patients with an undiagnosed lesion, 54 (58%) underwent biopsy; most patients underwent a single biopsy (n = 42, 77%), and 12 (23%) had two or more biopsies. Unbiopsied patients were diagnosed as having benign lesions according to imaging or had follow-up imaging. Of the 54 patients biopsied, 38 (70%) biopsies were obtained via fine-needle aspiration. Biopsy results were malignant for 34 patients (63%), benign for 14 (26%), and inconclusive for six (11%). Most patients were seen within 9 days of their initial contact (69/93, 74%), underwent biopsy within 20 days of seeing the physician (40/54, 74%), and had a final diagnosis within 30 days of the initial visit (72/93, 77%).

Conclusions: Our findings can help clinicians dispel the misconception that most undiagnosed lesions are malignant. Our findings also may help clinicians determine the appropriate workup for undiagnosed lesions. Further research is recommended to guide clinicians on the best sampling methodologies to obtain the highest yield of tissue for analysis. Dedicated patient workflows can help expedite diagnosis.

对未确诊病变的活检方式和时间线的分析:梅奥诊所的经验。
目的:在临床上或影像学上发现的偶发病变是具有诊断挑战性的。对这些病变的检查还没有很好的建立。我们调查了我们的机构对未确诊病变的诊断方式,以及从入院到活检和最终诊断的时间线。方法:我们回顾性分析了2018年11月1日至2022年7月31日期间梅奥诊所所有3个地点(亚利桑那州、佛罗里达州和明尼苏达州)的数据。我们评估了使用活检技术的频率(如果有的话)以及结果诊断为恶性、良性或不确定的频率。还评估了从摄入到活检和最终诊断的周转时间。结果:在93例未确诊病变的患者中,54例(58%)接受了活检;大多数患者进行了一次活检(n = 42, 77%), 12例(23%)进行了两次或两次以上活检。未活检的患者根据影像学诊断为良性病变或随访影像学检查。54例活检患者中,38例(70%)采用细针穿刺活检。活检结果为恶性34例(63%),良性14例(26%),不确定6例(11%)。大多数患者在初次就诊后9天内就诊(69/ 93,74%),在就诊后20天内进行活检(40/ 54,74%),在初次就诊后30天内进行最终诊断(72/ 93,77%)。结论:我们的发现可以帮助临床医生消除大多数未确诊病变是恶性的误解。我们的发现也可以帮助临床医生确定对未确诊病变的适当检查。进一步的研究建议指导临床医生的最佳采样方法,以获得最高产量的组织进行分析。专门的患者工作流程有助于加快诊断速度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Southern Medical Journal
Southern Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
222
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: As the official journal of the Birmingham, Alabama-based Southern Medical Association (SMA), the Southern Medical Journal (SMJ) has for more than 100 years provided the latest clinical information in areas that affect patients'' daily lives. Now delivered to individuals exclusively online, the SMJ has a multidisciplinary focus that covers a broad range of topics relevant to physicians and other healthcare specialists in all relevant aspects of the profession, including medicine and medical specialties, surgery and surgery specialties; child and maternal health; mental health; emergency and disaster medicine; public health and environmental medicine; bioethics and medical education; and quality health care, patient safety, and best practices. Each month, articles span the spectrum of medical topics, providing timely, up-to-the-minute information for both primary care physicians and specialists. Contributors include leaders in the healthcare field from across the country and around the world. The SMJ enables physicians to provide the best possible care to patients in this age of rapidly changing modern medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信