Tsung Mou, Akira Gillingham, Julia Geynisman-Tan, Oluwateniola Brown, Christina Lewicky-Gaupp, Margaret G Mueller, Kimberly Kenton, Sarah Collins
{"title":"Minimally Invasive Burch Colposuspension to Reduce De Novo Stress Incontinence: The MICRO Randomized Trial.","authors":"Tsung Mou, Akira Gillingham, Julia Geynisman-Tan, Oluwateniola Brown, Christina Lewicky-Gaupp, Margaret G Mueller, Kimberly Kenton, Sarah Collins","doi":"10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective was to determine whether the addition of prophylactic retropubic colposuspension is superior to no anti-incontinence procedure during minimally invasive surgical sacrocolpopexy for stress-continent patients in decreasing rates of postoperative de novo stress urinary incontinence (SUI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized superiority trial, we recruited stress-continent prolapse patients undergoing either conventional or robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with negative preoperative supine cough stress tests. Patients were randomized to receive either prophylactic retropubic colposuspension or no retropubic colposuspension (control). The primary outcome was the composite measure of postoperative de novo SUI at 3 months, which included either (1) \"Yes\" to Question #17 on the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 endorsing symptoms of urinary leakage with coughing, sneezing, laughing, (2) positive retrofill cough stress test, or (3) any SUI treatment after sacrocolpopexy. Using data from the Colpopexy and Urinary Reduction Efforts trial, a sample size of 42 participants would demonstrate the addition of prophylactic retropubic colposuspension to be superior to control with a superiority margin of 15%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty patients underwent randomization, with 26 assigned to prophylactic retropubic colposuspension and 24 as controls. Three months after surgery, 50.0% of the patients in the retropubic colposuspension group and 41.7% of controls met one or more criteria for de novo SUI (<i>P =</i> 0.555). There was no difference between the retropubic colposuspension and control groups in symptoms of urinary frequency, urgency incontinence, or urinary retention at 3 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among stress-continent patients undergoing minimally invasive surgical sacrocolpopexy in this single-center study, the addition of prophylactic retropubic colposuspension was not superior to no retropubic colposuspension in preventing postoperative de novo SUI at 3 months after surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":22043,"journal":{"name":"Southern Medical Journal","volume":"118 9","pages":"622-627"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001872","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The objective was to determine whether the addition of prophylactic retropubic colposuspension is superior to no anti-incontinence procedure during minimally invasive surgical sacrocolpopexy for stress-continent patients in decreasing rates of postoperative de novo stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Methods: In this randomized superiority trial, we recruited stress-continent prolapse patients undergoing either conventional or robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with negative preoperative supine cough stress tests. Patients were randomized to receive either prophylactic retropubic colposuspension or no retropubic colposuspension (control). The primary outcome was the composite measure of postoperative de novo SUI at 3 months, which included either (1) "Yes" to Question #17 on the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 endorsing symptoms of urinary leakage with coughing, sneezing, laughing, (2) positive retrofill cough stress test, or (3) any SUI treatment after sacrocolpopexy. Using data from the Colpopexy and Urinary Reduction Efforts trial, a sample size of 42 participants would demonstrate the addition of prophylactic retropubic colposuspension to be superior to control with a superiority margin of 15%.
Results: Fifty patients underwent randomization, with 26 assigned to prophylactic retropubic colposuspension and 24 as controls. Three months after surgery, 50.0% of the patients in the retropubic colposuspension group and 41.7% of controls met one or more criteria for de novo SUI (P = 0.555). There was no difference between the retropubic colposuspension and control groups in symptoms of urinary frequency, urgency incontinence, or urinary retention at 3 months.
Conclusions: Among stress-continent patients undergoing minimally invasive surgical sacrocolpopexy in this single-center study, the addition of prophylactic retropubic colposuspension was not superior to no retropubic colposuspension in preventing postoperative de novo SUI at 3 months after surgery.
期刊介绍:
As the official journal of the Birmingham, Alabama-based Southern Medical Association (SMA), the Southern Medical Journal (SMJ) has for more than 100 years provided the latest clinical information in areas that affect patients'' daily lives. Now delivered to individuals exclusively online, the SMJ has a multidisciplinary focus that covers a broad range of topics relevant to physicians and other healthcare specialists in all relevant aspects of the profession, including medicine and medical specialties, surgery and surgery specialties; child and maternal health; mental health; emergency and disaster medicine; public health and environmental medicine; bioethics and medical education; and quality health care, patient safety, and best practices. Each month, articles span the spectrum of medical topics, providing timely, up-to-the-minute information for both primary care physicians and specialists. Contributors include leaders in the healthcare field from across the country and around the world. The SMJ enables physicians to provide the best possible care to patients in this age of rapidly changing modern medicine.