Discrepancies in isoniazid susceptibility profiles: Bactec MGIT 960-resistant but GenoType MTBDRplus-susceptible Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains in Hunan, China.

IF 3.8 2区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Zhenhua Chen, Peilei Hu, Jingwei Guo, Jue Wang, Binbin Liu, Yunhong Tan
{"title":"Discrepancies in isoniazid susceptibility profiles: Bactec MGIT 960-resistant but GenoType MTBDR<i>plus</i>-susceptible <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i> strains in Hunan, China.","authors":"Zhenhua Chen, Peilei Hu, Jingwei Guo, Jue Wang, Binbin Liu, Yunhong Tan","doi":"10.1128/spectrum.01101-25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Discordant drug susceptibility testing (DST) results between the Bactec MGIT 960 system (MGIT) and the GenoType MTBDR<i>plus</i> assay (MTBDR<i>plus</i>) for isoniazid (INH) complicate clinical decision-making. In this study, we performed minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) assays and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) on 53 <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i> strains identified as INH-resistant by MGIT but INH-susceptible by MTBDR<i>plus</i>. The variants conferring INH resistance were evaluated by the WHO mutation catalogue. Our results showed that only five strains carried variants classified as \"associated with resistance\" (Group 1/2), including <i>katG</i> Trp39STOP, <i>katG</i> Ser315Asn, <i>inhA</i> -154G>A, and <i>inhA</i> Ser94Ala. In addition, 44 strains carried 70 variants classified as \"Group 3: Uncertain significance\" across nine genes, including <i>katG</i>, <i>ahpC</i>, <i>inhA</i>, <i>Rv0010c</i>, <i>Rv1129c</i>, <i>Rv2752c</i>, <i>mshA</i>, <i>dnaA</i>, and <i>Rv1258c</i>. The remaining four strains carried no variants (Groups 1-3) linked to INH resistance. No significant difference in the prevalence of high-level INH resistance was observed between lineage 2 and lineage 4 strains (<i>χ</i>² = 0.232, <i>P</i> = 0.630). Our findings indicate that the variants classified as \"uncertain significance\" may be the main genetic determinants causing discordant results, highlighting their associations with INH resistance that need to be further investigated.</p><p><strong>Importance: </strong>This study addresses a critical challenge in drug susceptibility testing (DST): the discrepancies in DST results for isoniazid (INH) between the Bactec MGIT 960 system and the GenoType MTBDR<i>plus</i> assay. These discordant results significantly complicate treatment decisions, potentially leading to suboptimal patient outcomes. Using MIC assays and WGS on 53 clinical <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i> strains, we provide valuable insights into the genetic basis of INH resistance. Our findings showed that only a small fraction of strains carried variants definitively linked to INH resistance, while a larger number harbored variants of uncertain significance across multiple genes, underscoring the complexity of INH resistance mechanisms. This study highlights the urgent need to refine our understanding of these \"Group 3: uncertain significance\" variants, as they appear to be a primary driver of the discrepancies. Additionally, this study emphasizes the importance of integrating advanced sequencing tools into DST to improve the accuracy of INH resistance detection.</p>","PeriodicalId":18670,"journal":{"name":"Microbiology spectrum","volume":" ","pages":"e0110125"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbiology spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.01101-25","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Discordant drug susceptibility testing (DST) results between the Bactec MGIT 960 system (MGIT) and the GenoType MTBDRplus assay (MTBDRplus) for isoniazid (INH) complicate clinical decision-making. In this study, we performed minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) assays and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) on 53 Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains identified as INH-resistant by MGIT but INH-susceptible by MTBDRplus. The variants conferring INH resistance were evaluated by the WHO mutation catalogue. Our results showed that only five strains carried variants classified as "associated with resistance" (Group 1/2), including katG Trp39STOP, katG Ser315Asn, inhA -154G>A, and inhA Ser94Ala. In addition, 44 strains carried 70 variants classified as "Group 3: Uncertain significance" across nine genes, including katG, ahpC, inhA, Rv0010c, Rv1129c, Rv2752c, mshA, dnaA, and Rv1258c. The remaining four strains carried no variants (Groups 1-3) linked to INH resistance. No significant difference in the prevalence of high-level INH resistance was observed between lineage 2 and lineage 4 strains (χ² = 0.232, P = 0.630). Our findings indicate that the variants classified as "uncertain significance" may be the main genetic determinants causing discordant results, highlighting their associations with INH resistance that need to be further investigated.

Importance: This study addresses a critical challenge in drug susceptibility testing (DST): the discrepancies in DST results for isoniazid (INH) between the Bactec MGIT 960 system and the GenoType MTBDRplus assay. These discordant results significantly complicate treatment decisions, potentially leading to suboptimal patient outcomes. Using MIC assays and WGS on 53 clinical Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains, we provide valuable insights into the genetic basis of INH resistance. Our findings showed that only a small fraction of strains carried variants definitively linked to INH resistance, while a larger number harbored variants of uncertain significance across multiple genes, underscoring the complexity of INH resistance mechanisms. This study highlights the urgent need to refine our understanding of these "Group 3: uncertain significance" variants, as they appear to be a primary driver of the discrepancies. Additionally, this study emphasizes the importance of integrating advanced sequencing tools into DST to improve the accuracy of INH resistance detection.

异烟肼敏感谱的差异:Bactec MGIT 960耐药但基因型mtbdrplus敏感的中国湖南结核分枝杆菌菌株
Bactec MGIT 960系统(MGIT)与基因型MTBDRplus试验(MTBDRplus)对异烟肼(INH)的药敏试验(DST)结果不一致,使临床决策复杂化。在本研究中,我们对53株MGIT鉴定为inh耐药而MTBDRplus鉴定为inh敏感的结核分枝杆菌进行了最低抑制浓度(MIC)测定和全基因组测序(WGS)。通过世卫组织突变目录对具有INH耐药性的变异进行了评估。我们的研究结果显示,只有5株菌株携带被归类为“与耐药性相关”的变异(1/2组),包括katG Trp39STOP、katG Ser315Asn、inhA -154G>A和inhA Ser94Ala。此外,44株菌株在katG、ahpC、inhA、Rv0010c、Rv1129c、Rv2752c、mshA、dnaA、Rv1258c等9个基因中携带70个变异,被归类为“第3组:不确定意义”。其余4株没有携带与INH抗性相关的变异(1-3组)。株2和株4对INH耐药率差异无统计学意义(χ 2 = 0.232, P = 0.630)。我们的研究结果表明,被归类为“不确定意义”的变异可能是导致不一致结果的主要遗传决定因素,强调了它们与INH抗性的关系,需要进一步研究。重要性:本研究解决了药敏试验(DST)的一个关键挑战:Bactec MGIT 960系统和基因型MTBDRplus测定法对异烟肼(INH)的DST结果存在差异。这些不一致的结果显著地使治疗决策复杂化,可能导致患者预后不理想。通过对53株临床结核分枝杆菌的MIC和WGS检测,我们对INH耐药的遗传基础提供了有价值的见解。我们的研究结果表明,只有一小部分菌株携带与INH抗性明确相关的变异,而更多的菌株携带跨多个基因的不确定意义的变异,强调了INH抗性机制的复杂性。这项研究强调了迫切需要完善我们对这些“第3组:不确定意义”变体的理解,因为它们似乎是差异的主要驱动因素。此外,本研究强调了将先进的测序工具整合到DST中以提高INH耐药性检测的准确性的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Microbiology spectrum
Microbiology spectrum Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Genetics
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
1800
期刊介绍: Microbiology Spectrum publishes commissioned review articles on topics in microbiology representing ten content areas: Archaea; Food Microbiology; Bacterial Genetics, Cell Biology, and Physiology; Clinical Microbiology; Environmental Microbiology and Ecology; Eukaryotic Microbes; Genomics, Computational, and Synthetic Microbiology; Immunology; Pathogenesis; and Virology. Reviews are interrelated, with each review linking to other related content. A large board of Microbiology Spectrum editors aids in the development of topics for potential reviews and in the identification of an editor, or editors, who shepherd each collection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信