Impact of Time-to-Surgery on Adverse Outcomes for Distal Radius Fractures: A Population-Based Study.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Jonathan Persitz, Heather Baltzer, Andrew Calzavara, Jesse Wolfstadt, Ryan Paul, Andrea Chan, Samantha Lee, Brandon Zagorski, David R Urbach
{"title":"Impact of Time-to-Surgery on Adverse Outcomes for Distal Radius Fractures: A Population-Based Study.","authors":"Jonathan Persitz, Heather Baltzer, Andrew Calzavara, Jesse Wolfstadt, Ryan Paul, Andrea Chan, Samantha Lee, Brandon Zagorski, David R Urbach","doi":"10.1097/BOT.0000000000003086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the optimal time window for surgical fixation of acute, isolated distal radius fractures (DRFs) in order to minimize postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Design: Retrospective, population-based cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Province-wide analysis using administrative health databases in Ontario, Canada.</p><p><strong>Patient selection criteria: </strong>Adult patients (≥18 years) who underwent surgical fixation for acute, isolated DRFs (OTA/AO 2R3) between 2010 and 2020 were included. Patients with open fractures, polytrauma, neurovascular injury, or fractures marked as urgent were excluded. Wait time to surgery was defined as days from emergency department presentation to operative intervention.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and comparisons: </strong>The primary outcome was a composite of complications including any complication or revision surgery within 10 years. Secondary outcomes included infection and revision individually. Wait time to surgery was analyzed both as a continuous variable and as a categorical variable. For the categorical analysis, patients were stratified into seven intervals (0-2, 3-5, 6-9, 10-15, 16-20, 21-25, and 26-30 days). These cut-offs were chosen to provide relatively small, evenly distributed time ranges while maintaining sufficient patient numbers within each group to ensure statistical power and model stability. This approach allowed for meaningful comparisons across the surgical wait-time spectrum while complementing the continuous analysis. Cox multivariable models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs), adjusting for demographics, comorbidities, fracture and fixation type, surgeon volume, and hospital type. An instrumental variable analysis using institutional wait times was performed to address confounding by indication.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 13,389 patients met inclusion criteria. Patients were predominantly female (71.2%) with a mean age of 55.7 years (Range 18-95). The 0-2 day group served as the reference and demonstrated the highest complication rates. Compared with this group, patients treated within 6-20 days had a significantly lower risk of composite complications, with the greatest benefit observed in the 6-9 day (HR 0.84, 95% CI: 0.73-0.97, P=0.02) and 10-15 day (HR 0.78, 95% CI: 0.67-0.90, P=0.001) subgroups. Infection risk was similarly lowest in the 6-15 day window, with the most favorable outcomes in the 10-15 day subgroup (HR 0.59, 95% CI: 0.41-0.84, P=0.003). Institutional-level analysis showed a 30% lower infection risk for treatment within 6-15 days compared to 1-5 days (HR 0.70, 95% CI: 0.56-0.87, P=0.002). Surgeries delayed >25 days showed a non-significant trend toward worse outcomes (HR 1.10, 95% CI: 0.75-1.32, P=0.88).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Surgical fixation of distal radius fractures within 6-15 days was associated with the lowest observed rates of composite complications and infection. These findings suggest that this timeframe may represent an optimal window for intervention. By evaluating multiple discrete time points, this study contributes to the understanding of \"when to operate,\" complementing prior literature focused primarily on delayed surgery.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000003086","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the optimal time window for surgical fixation of acute, isolated distal radius fractures (DRFs) in order to minimize postoperative complications.

Methods: Design: Retrospective, population-based cohort study.

Setting: Province-wide analysis using administrative health databases in Ontario, Canada.

Patient selection criteria: Adult patients (≥18 years) who underwent surgical fixation for acute, isolated DRFs (OTA/AO 2R3) between 2010 and 2020 were included. Patients with open fractures, polytrauma, neurovascular injury, or fractures marked as urgent were excluded. Wait time to surgery was defined as days from emergency department presentation to operative intervention.

Outcome measures and comparisons: The primary outcome was a composite of complications including any complication or revision surgery within 10 years. Secondary outcomes included infection and revision individually. Wait time to surgery was analyzed both as a continuous variable and as a categorical variable. For the categorical analysis, patients were stratified into seven intervals (0-2, 3-5, 6-9, 10-15, 16-20, 21-25, and 26-30 days). These cut-offs were chosen to provide relatively small, evenly distributed time ranges while maintaining sufficient patient numbers within each group to ensure statistical power and model stability. This approach allowed for meaningful comparisons across the surgical wait-time spectrum while complementing the continuous analysis. Cox multivariable models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs), adjusting for demographics, comorbidities, fracture and fixation type, surgeon volume, and hospital type. An instrumental variable analysis using institutional wait times was performed to address confounding by indication.

Results: A total of 13,389 patients met inclusion criteria. Patients were predominantly female (71.2%) with a mean age of 55.7 years (Range 18-95). The 0-2 day group served as the reference and demonstrated the highest complication rates. Compared with this group, patients treated within 6-20 days had a significantly lower risk of composite complications, with the greatest benefit observed in the 6-9 day (HR 0.84, 95% CI: 0.73-0.97, P=0.02) and 10-15 day (HR 0.78, 95% CI: 0.67-0.90, P=0.001) subgroups. Infection risk was similarly lowest in the 6-15 day window, with the most favorable outcomes in the 10-15 day subgroup (HR 0.59, 95% CI: 0.41-0.84, P=0.003). Institutional-level analysis showed a 30% lower infection risk for treatment within 6-15 days compared to 1-5 days (HR 0.70, 95% CI: 0.56-0.87, P=0.002). Surgeries delayed >25 days showed a non-significant trend toward worse outcomes (HR 1.10, 95% CI: 0.75-1.32, P=0.88).

Conclusions: Surgical fixation of distal radius fractures within 6-15 days was associated with the lowest observed rates of composite complications and infection. These findings suggest that this timeframe may represent an optimal window for intervention. By evaluating multiple discrete time points, this study contributes to the understanding of "when to operate," complementing prior literature focused primarily on delayed surgery.

Level of evidence: Level III.

手术时间对桡骨远端骨折不良结局的影响:一项基于人群的研究。
目的:确定急性孤立性桡骨远端骨折(DRFs)手术固定的最佳时间窗,以减少术后并发症。方法:设计:回顾性、基于人群的队列研究。环境:使用加拿大安大略省的行政卫生数据库进行全省范围的分析。患者选择标准:纳入2010年至2020年间因急性孤立性DRFs (OTA/AO 2R3)接受手术固定的成年患者(≥18岁)。排除开放性骨折、多发伤、神经血管损伤或紧急骨折的患者。等待手术的时间定义为从急诊科就诊到手术干预的天数。结果测量和比较:主要结果是并发症的综合,包括10年内的任何并发症或翻修手术。次要结局包括感染和单独翻修。手术等待时间作为连续变量和分类变量进行分析。在分类分析中,将患者分为7个时间段(0-2、3-5、6-9、10-15、16-20、21-25、26-30天)。选择这些截止点是为了提供相对较小且均匀分布的时间范围,同时在每组中保持足够的患者人数,以确保统计效力和模型稳定性。这种方法可以对手术等待时间谱进行有意义的比较,同时补充了连续分析。Cox多变量模型用于估计危险比(hr),调整了人口统计学、合并症、骨折和固定类型、外科医生数量和医院类型。使用机构等待时间进行工具变量分析,以解决指征引起的混淆。结果:13389例患者符合纳入标准。患者以女性为主(71.2%),平均年龄55.7岁(范围18-95岁)。以0-2天组为参照,并发症发生率最高。与该组相比,6-20天内治疗的患者发生复合并发症的风险显著降低,其中6-9天(HR 0.84, 95% CI: 0.73-0.97, P=0.02)和10-15天(HR 0.78, 95% CI: 0.67-0.90, P=0.001)亚组获益最大。感染风险同样在6-15天窗口期最低,10-15天亚组结果最有利(HR 0.59, 95% CI: 0.41-0.84, P=0.003)。机构水平分析显示,与1-5天治疗相比,6-15天治疗的感染风险降低30% (HR 0.70, 95% CI: 0.56-0.87, P=0.002)。手术延迟50 ~ 25天无明显恶化趋势(HR 1.10, 95% CI: 0.75 ~ 1.32, P=0.88)。结论:桡骨远端骨折手术内固定6-15天内复合并发症和感染发生率最低。这些发现表明,这一时间段可能是干预的最佳窗口。通过评估多个离散时间点,本研究有助于理解“何时手术”,补充了先前主要关注延迟手术的文献。证据等级:三级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
396
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma is devoted exclusively to the diagnosis and management of hard and soft tissue trauma, including injuries to bone, muscle, ligament, and tendons, as well as spinal cord injuries. Under the guidance of a distinguished international board of editors, the journal provides the most current information on diagnostic techniques, new and improved surgical instruments and procedures, surgical implants and prosthetic devices, bioplastics and biometals; and physical therapy and rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信