Inaccurate Disclosure of Suicidal Thoughts During Population-Based Suicide Risk Screening in Primary Care in the Veterans Health Administration.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Steven K Dobscha, Meike Niederhausen, Kathleen F Carlson, Nazanin Bahraini, Robert Handley, Apoorva Salvi, Victoria Elliott, Annabelle Rynerson, Lauren M Denneson
{"title":"Inaccurate Disclosure of Suicidal Thoughts During Population-Based Suicide Risk Screening in Primary Care in the Veterans Health Administration.","authors":"Steven K Dobscha, Meike Niederhausen, Kathleen F Carlson, Nazanin Bahraini, Robert Handley, Apoorva Salvi, Victoria Elliott, Annabelle Rynerson, Lauren M Denneson","doi":"10.1007/s11606-025-09822-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prior research suggests that disclosure of suicidal thoughts in healthcare settings may be low.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Describe frequency of self-reported inaccurate disclosure of suicidal ideation during population-based screening and evaluation in primary care and identify patient characteristics associated with inaccurate disclosure.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>National survey study examining veteran experiences with the Veterans Health Administration's (VHA) suicide risk screening program, Risk ID.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A national sample of 2001 veterans screened in primary care between February and October 2021 were mailed surveys. Eight-hundred sixty-eight surveys were returned, and 734 respondents recalled being screened.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Several survey items which asked to what extent respondents had accurately responded to clinicians or nurse/medical assistants when asked about suicidal thoughts.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Fourteen percent and 18% of screen-negative participants and 40% and 48% of screen-positive participants reported responding less than very accurately to questions about suicidal thoughts when asked by nurses/medical assistants and providers, respectively. Among screen-negative participants, factors associated with inaccurate disclosure included being Black, American Indian/Alaska Native, Hispanic, Asian, or Multi-racial; higher levels of psychological distress and greater barriers to care; and lower ratings of the clinician-patient relationship. Factors associated with inaccurate disclosure in screen-positive participants included greater barriers to care, perceptions that screening questions did not make sense, perceptions that they would not be taken seriously, and lower ratings of satisfaction with the screening process.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Inaccurate disclosure during VHA population-based suicide risk evaluation is not uncommon. Patients who are Black, American Indian/Alaska Native, Hispanic, Asian, or Multi-racial, are in more distress, report more barriers to care, or are less satisfied with the screening process may be less likely to disclose accurately. The results highlight that clinicians should not overly rely on screening results for clinical decision-making, and reinforce the value of strong clinician-patient treatment relationships and positive screening experiences in promoting accurate disclosure.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-025-09822-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Prior research suggests that disclosure of suicidal thoughts in healthcare settings may be low.

Objectives: Describe frequency of self-reported inaccurate disclosure of suicidal ideation during population-based screening and evaluation in primary care and identify patient characteristics associated with inaccurate disclosure.

Design: National survey study examining veteran experiences with the Veterans Health Administration's (VHA) suicide risk screening program, Risk ID.

Participants: A national sample of 2001 veterans screened in primary care between February and October 2021 were mailed surveys. Eight-hundred sixty-eight surveys were returned, and 734 respondents recalled being screened.

Main measures: Several survey items which asked to what extent respondents had accurately responded to clinicians or nurse/medical assistants when asked about suicidal thoughts.

Key results: Fourteen percent and 18% of screen-negative participants and 40% and 48% of screen-positive participants reported responding less than very accurately to questions about suicidal thoughts when asked by nurses/medical assistants and providers, respectively. Among screen-negative participants, factors associated with inaccurate disclosure included being Black, American Indian/Alaska Native, Hispanic, Asian, or Multi-racial; higher levels of psychological distress and greater barriers to care; and lower ratings of the clinician-patient relationship. Factors associated with inaccurate disclosure in screen-positive participants included greater barriers to care, perceptions that screening questions did not make sense, perceptions that they would not be taken seriously, and lower ratings of satisfaction with the screening process.

Conclusion: Inaccurate disclosure during VHA population-based suicide risk evaluation is not uncommon. Patients who are Black, American Indian/Alaska Native, Hispanic, Asian, or Multi-racial, are in more distress, report more barriers to care, or are less satisfied with the screening process may be less likely to disclose accurately. The results highlight that clinicians should not overly rely on screening results for clinical decision-making, and reinforce the value of strong clinician-patient treatment relationships and positive screening experiences in promoting accurate disclosure.

退伍军人健康管理局初级保健中基于人群的自杀风险筛查中自杀念头的不准确披露
背景:先前的研究表明,在医疗机构中自杀念头的披露可能很低。目的:描述在基于人群的初级保健筛查和评估中自我报告的不准确披露自杀意念的频率,并确定与不准确披露相关的患者特征。设计:通过退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)的自杀风险筛查项目risk ID,对退伍军人的经历进行全国性调查研究。参与者:在2021年2月至10月期间接受初级保健筛查的2001名退伍军人的全国样本进行了邮寄调查。收到了868份调查问卷,其中734名受访者回忆说曾接受过筛选。主要措施:几个调查项目,询问受访者在多大程度上准确地回答临床医生或护士/医疗助理被问及自杀念头。关键结果:分别有14%和18%的筛查阴性参与者和40%和48%的筛查阳性参与者报告说,当护士/医疗助理和提供者询问有关自杀念头的问题时,他们的回答不太准确。在筛查阴性的参与者中,与不准确信息披露相关的因素包括黑人、美洲印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民、西班牙裔、亚洲人或多种族;更严重的心理困扰和更大的护理障碍;医患关系的评分也较低。与筛查阳性参与者不准确的信息披露相关的因素包括更大的护理障碍,认为筛查问题没有意义,认为他们不会被认真对待,以及对筛查过程的满意度较低。结论:在以VHA人群为基础的自杀风险评估中,不准确的信息披露并不罕见。黑人、美洲印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民、西班牙裔、亚裔或多种族的患者更痛苦,报告更多的护理障碍,或对筛查过程不太满意,可能不太可能准确披露。结果强调,临床医生不应过度依赖筛查结果进行临床决策,并强调牢固的临床-患者治疗关系和积极的筛查经验在促进准确披露方面的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Journal of General Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
749
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信