Diagnostic and Monitoring Strategies for VEXAS Syndrome: Evaluating Sanger Sequencing, NGS, and the SWIM-Score.

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Lasse von Bornemann Fløe, Kirstine Overgaard Dyrmose, Camilla Darum Sørensen, Maja Nørgaard, Fie Kirstine Udby Pedersen, Johan Vad-Nielsen, Michael Knudsen, Mette Christiansen, Marie Bill, Mads Nyhuus Bendix Rasch, Ellen Margrethe Hauge, Anne Troldborg, Nicklas Heine Staunstrup, Jens Magnus Bernth Jensen
{"title":"Diagnostic and Monitoring Strategies for VEXAS Syndrome: Evaluating Sanger Sequencing, NGS, and the SWIM-Score.","authors":"Lasse von Bornemann Fløe, Kirstine Overgaard Dyrmose, Camilla Darum Sørensen, Maja Nørgaard, Fie Kirstine Udby Pedersen, Johan Vad-Nielsen, Michael Knudsen, Mette Christiansen, Marie Bill, Mads Nyhuus Bendix Rasch, Ellen Margrethe Hauge, Anne Troldborg, Nicklas Heine Staunstrup, Jens Magnus Bernth Jensen","doi":"10.1007/s10875-025-01932-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>VEXAS syndrome is an adult-onset autoinflammatory disorder caused by somatic UBA1 variants, but there are no standardized criteria for genetic testing or diagnostics. This study compared Sanger sequencing and next-generation sequencing (NGS) for detecting UBA1 variants in patients with suspected VEXAS, assessed the ability of Sanger sequencing to estimate variant allele fractions (VAFs), and evaluated the Maeda et al. scoring system for selecting patients for genetic testing in a primary cohort and a validation cohort. In the primary cohort of 104 patients, Sanger sequencing identified VEXAS variants in 12%, with no additional cases detected by NGS. Sanger sequencing accurately quantified VAFs ranging from 0.1 to 0.9. In a small longitudinal subset (n = 3), VAFs in blood correlated with CRP levels, increased over time despite various treatments, but decreased in two patients after initiation of Azacitidine treatment. The novel parameters, VAF in myeloid cells and VEXAS cell concentration, showed promise as exploratory markers for patient monitoring. The Maeda-score, requiring a threshold score of 2 for 100% sensitivity, exhibited low specificity-29% in the primary cohort and 41% in the validation cohort (n = 62, with 2 carrying VEXAS variants). In contrast, the simplified SWIM-score-based on Skin involvement, Weight loss, Inflammation, and Macrocytic anemia-achieved 100% sensitivity in both cohorts, with higher specificities of 47% and 65%, respectively. In conclusion, Sanger sequencing reliably detected UBA1 variants and quantified VAFs. Monitoring VAF and VEXAS cell concentration may track disease progression, and the SWIM-score demonstrated potential for accurately selecting patients for UBA1 testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":15531,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Immunology","volume":"45 1","pages":"138"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12484315/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10875-025-01932-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

VEXAS syndrome is an adult-onset autoinflammatory disorder caused by somatic UBA1 variants, but there are no standardized criteria for genetic testing or diagnostics. This study compared Sanger sequencing and next-generation sequencing (NGS) for detecting UBA1 variants in patients with suspected VEXAS, assessed the ability of Sanger sequencing to estimate variant allele fractions (VAFs), and evaluated the Maeda et al. scoring system for selecting patients for genetic testing in a primary cohort and a validation cohort. In the primary cohort of 104 patients, Sanger sequencing identified VEXAS variants in 12%, with no additional cases detected by NGS. Sanger sequencing accurately quantified VAFs ranging from 0.1 to 0.9. In a small longitudinal subset (n = 3), VAFs in blood correlated with CRP levels, increased over time despite various treatments, but decreased in two patients after initiation of Azacitidine treatment. The novel parameters, VAF in myeloid cells and VEXAS cell concentration, showed promise as exploratory markers for patient monitoring. The Maeda-score, requiring a threshold score of 2 for 100% sensitivity, exhibited low specificity-29% in the primary cohort and 41% in the validation cohort (n = 62, with 2 carrying VEXAS variants). In contrast, the simplified SWIM-score-based on Skin involvement, Weight loss, Inflammation, and Macrocytic anemia-achieved 100% sensitivity in both cohorts, with higher specificities of 47% and 65%, respectively. In conclusion, Sanger sequencing reliably detected UBA1 variants and quantified VAFs. Monitoring VAF and VEXAS cell concentration may track disease progression, and the SWIM-score demonstrated potential for accurately selecting patients for UBA1 testing.

VEXAS综合征的诊断和监测策略:评估Sanger测序,NGS和swim评分。
VEXAS综合征是一种成人发病的自身炎症性疾病,由体细胞UBA1变异引起,但没有标准化的基因检测或诊断标准。本研究比较了Sanger测序和下一代测序(NGS)在疑似VEXAS患者中检测UBA1变异的能力,评估了Sanger测序估计变异等位基因分数(VAFs)的能力,并评估了Maeda等人在初级队列和验证队列中选择患者进行基因检测的评分系统。在104例患者的主要队列中,Sanger测序在12%的患者中发现了VEXAS变异,NGS未检测到其他病例。Sanger测序准确地定量了0.1至0.9范围内的vaf。在一个小的纵向亚群(n = 3)中,血液中的VAFs与CRP水平相关,尽管接受了各种治疗,但随着时间的推移,VAFs升高,但在两名患者开始阿扎胞苷治疗后,VAFs下降。新的参数,髓细胞VAF和VEXAS细胞浓度,有望作为患者监测的探索性标记。maeda评分要求阈值为2分才能达到100%的敏感性,但其特异性较低,在主要队列中为29%,在验证队列中为41% (n = 62,其中2例携带VEXAS变体)。相比之下,简化的基于皮肤受累、体重减轻、炎症和大细胞性贫血的swim评分在两个队列中均达到100%的敏感性,特异性分别为47%和65%。总之,Sanger测序可靠地检测了UBA1变异并定量了vaf。监测VAF和VEXAS细胞浓度可以跟踪疾病进展,swim评分显示了准确选择患者进行UBA1检测的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
9.90%
发文量
218
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Immunology publishes impactful papers in the realm of human immunology, delving into the diagnosis, pathogenesis, prognosis, or treatment of human diseases. The journal places particular emphasis on primary immunodeficiencies and related diseases, encompassing inborn errors of immunity in a broad sense, their underlying genotypes, and diverse phenotypes. These phenotypes include infection, malignancy, allergy, auto-inflammation, and autoimmunity. We welcome a broad spectrum of studies in this domain, spanning genetic discovery, clinical description, immunologic assessment, diagnostic approaches, prognosis evaluation, and treatment interventions. Case reports are considered if they are genuinely original and accompanied by a concise review of the relevant medical literature, illustrating how the novel case study advances the field. The instructions to authors provide detailed guidance on the four categories of papers accepted by the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信