A Cadaveric Study: Does Deltoid Ligament Repair Impact the Quality of Syndesmotic Reduction?

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Christopher R Leland, Adam N Musick, Robert K Wagner, Maaz Muhammad, Carla H Lehle, Thomas J Policicchio, Austin T Gregg, Marco T Di Stefano, Michael G Young, Arjun Srinath, Arun Aneja
{"title":"A Cadaveric Study: Does Deltoid Ligament Repair Impact the Quality of Syndesmotic Reduction?","authors":"Christopher R Leland, Adam N Musick, Robert K Wagner, Maaz Muhammad, Carla H Lehle, Thomas J Policicchio, Austin T Gregg, Marco T Di Stefano, Michael G Young, Arjun Srinath, Arun Aneja","doi":"10.1097/BOT.0000000000003084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the quality of syndesmotic reduction with and without deltoid ligament repair (DLR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten cadaveric ankle specimens underwent baseline computed tomography (CT) imaging in neutral plantarflexion. A fellowship-trained orthopaedic trauma surgeon disrupted the syndesmosis and deltoid ligament of each specimen. The syndesmosis was reduced in neutral plantarflexion by manual hand pressure under direct visualization through an anterolateral approach and stabilized with two 0.062-inch K-wires placed lateral-to-medial in a quadricortical fashion. Postreduction CT imaging was then obtained. K-wires were removed, and DLR was performed using suture anchor fixation. The syndesmosis was again reduced and stabilized using the same technique, followed by a second postreduction CT scan. Four validated measurements were used to evaluate the quality of syndesmotic reduction. All postreduction CT scans were compared to baseline using mixed-effects linear regression to account for the nesting of ankles within donors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten cadaveric ankle specimens were obtained from five donors (mean age: 76.8 years [range: 70-83 years], 3 female and 2 male). Postreduction CT imaging demonstrated mean anterior translation of the fibula, both with DLR compared to baseline (6.4±1.1 mm vs. 7.7±1.5 mm, P=0.001) and without DLR compared to baseline (6.4±1.9 mm vs. 7.7±1.5 mm, P<0.001). The fibula was internally rotated following DLR when compared to baseline when evaluating mean rotation ratio (0.3±0.1 vs. 0.4±0.2, P=0.04) but not mean rotation angle (15.4±3.9 degrees vs. 13.3±3.2 degrees, P=0.12). No differences were observed in mean lateral translation with or without DLR compared to baseline (P>0.05). Direct comparison of reductions with and without DLR showed no differences in measures of mean reduction quality (P>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this cadaveric study, DLR did not significantly improve syndesmotic reduction quality compared to reductions performed without DLR. Relative internal rotation of the fibula was observed after DLR, perhaps due to prevention of talar external rotation and tensioning of the medial side during syndesmotic reduction.</p>","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000003084","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the quality of syndesmotic reduction with and without deltoid ligament repair (DLR).

Methods: Ten cadaveric ankle specimens underwent baseline computed tomography (CT) imaging in neutral plantarflexion. A fellowship-trained orthopaedic trauma surgeon disrupted the syndesmosis and deltoid ligament of each specimen. The syndesmosis was reduced in neutral plantarflexion by manual hand pressure under direct visualization through an anterolateral approach and stabilized with two 0.062-inch K-wires placed lateral-to-medial in a quadricortical fashion. Postreduction CT imaging was then obtained. K-wires were removed, and DLR was performed using suture anchor fixation. The syndesmosis was again reduced and stabilized using the same technique, followed by a second postreduction CT scan. Four validated measurements were used to evaluate the quality of syndesmotic reduction. All postreduction CT scans were compared to baseline using mixed-effects linear regression to account for the nesting of ankles within donors.

Results: Ten cadaveric ankle specimens were obtained from five donors (mean age: 76.8 years [range: 70-83 years], 3 female and 2 male). Postreduction CT imaging demonstrated mean anterior translation of the fibula, both with DLR compared to baseline (6.4±1.1 mm vs. 7.7±1.5 mm, P=0.001) and without DLR compared to baseline (6.4±1.9 mm vs. 7.7±1.5 mm, P<0.001). The fibula was internally rotated following DLR when compared to baseline when evaluating mean rotation ratio (0.3±0.1 vs. 0.4±0.2, P=0.04) but not mean rotation angle (15.4±3.9 degrees vs. 13.3±3.2 degrees, P=0.12). No differences were observed in mean lateral translation with or without DLR compared to baseline (P>0.05). Direct comparison of reductions with and without DLR showed no differences in measures of mean reduction quality (P>0.05).

Conclusions: In this cadaveric study, DLR did not significantly improve syndesmotic reduction quality compared to reductions performed without DLR. Relative internal rotation of the fibula was observed after DLR, perhaps due to prevention of talar external rotation and tensioning of the medial side during syndesmotic reduction.

尸体研究:三角韧带修复会影响韧带联合复位的质量吗?
目的:比较三角韧带修复术(DLR)前后韧带联合复位的质量。方法:10例尸体踝关节标本行中性跖屈基线CT成像。一位训练有素的骨科创伤外科医生破坏了每个标本的韧带联合和三角韧带。中立性跖屈时,通过前外侧入路直接观察,通过手压复位关节联合,并用两根0.062英寸的k针从外侧到内侧以四皮质方式固定。然后获得生产后的CT成像。拆除k针,采用缝合锚定固定进行DLR。使用相同的技术再次复位并稳定联合,随后进行第二次复位后CT扫描。采用四种有效的测量方法来评估关节联合复位的质量。使用混合效应线性回归将所有产后CT扫描结果与基线进行比较,以解释供体踝关节嵌套情况。结果:5例供体,平均年龄76.8岁(70 ~ 83岁),女性3例,男性2例。术后CT成像显示腓骨平均前平移,与基线相比,有DLR(6.4±1.1 mm vs. 7.7±1.5 mm, P=0.001)和无DLR(6.4±1.9 mm vs. 7.7±1.5 mm, P0.05)。直接比较有DLR和没有DLR的复位,在测量平均复位质量方面没有差异(P < 0.05)。结论:在这项尸体研究中,与不进行DLR的复位相比,DLR并没有显著改善关节综合征复位质量。DLR后观察到腓骨的相对内旋,可能是由于在韧带联合复位过程中防止距骨外旋和内侧紧张。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
396
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma is devoted exclusively to the diagnosis and management of hard and soft tissue trauma, including injuries to bone, muscle, ligament, and tendons, as well as spinal cord injuries. Under the guidance of a distinguished international board of editors, the journal provides the most current information on diagnostic techniques, new and improved surgical instruments and procedures, surgical implants and prosthetic devices, bioplastics and biometals; and physical therapy and rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信