M. K. M. Alharbi, Abel Zhou, Rob Davidson, Mark Naunton, Chandra Makanjee
{"title":"Monte Carlo analysis of energy deposition and X-ray fluence in cylindrical anode systems","authors":"M. K. M. Alharbi, Abel Zhou, Rob Davidson, Mark Naunton, Chandra Makanjee","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Cylindrical anode X-ray systems are increasingly used in multisource imaging; however, electron beam interactions with the curved anodes cause geometric distortions that alter energy deposition and X-ray emission. Understanding these effects is key to optimizing system performance.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>This study uses Monte Carlo (MC) simulations to examine how electron beam size, anode radius, and polar angle influence energy deposition and X-ray fluence in cylindrical anode setups, and to quantify the distortions and energy redistribution for improved X-ray generation efficiency and beam stability.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>MC simulations were performed with electron beams (0.5 × 0.5 mm and 2 × 2 mm, 120 keV) on cylindrical tungsten anodes with radii from 1 to 5 cm and polar angles from 20.5° to 71.8°. Energy deposition profiles, dimensions, and photon fluence distributions were analyzed using the FLUKA MC package, with mapping in cylindrical coordinates (<i>r</i>-<i>ϕ</i>-<i>z</i>).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Energy deposition profiles varied with beam position and anode curvature. The axial full width at half maximum (FWHM) increased by up to 650% at larger polar angles, while the azimuthal FWHM decreased up to 50%. Larger anode radii reduced the azimuthal FWHM by up to 78%, with minimal changes in axial and radial components. Narrower beams (0.5 × 0.5 mm<sup>2</sup>) produced smaller, more symmetric energy deposition profiles on anode surface. Overshoot occurred at small radii and large polar angles, leading to incomplete energy deposition.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Larger anode radii and moderate polar angles minimized energy deposition profiles distortion and improved X-ray fluence uniformity and production efficiency. Overshooting at small radii and large angles caused deformation, emphasizing the need for precise beam positioning to balance distortion, uniformity, and efficiency. These results define the geometric limits for effective energy deposition profile formation in cylindrical anode systems.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"26 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12483768/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.70262","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Cylindrical anode X-ray systems are increasingly used in multisource imaging; however, electron beam interactions with the curved anodes cause geometric distortions that alter energy deposition and X-ray emission. Understanding these effects is key to optimizing system performance.
Purpose
This study uses Monte Carlo (MC) simulations to examine how electron beam size, anode radius, and polar angle influence energy deposition and X-ray fluence in cylindrical anode setups, and to quantify the distortions and energy redistribution for improved X-ray generation efficiency and beam stability.
Methods
MC simulations were performed with electron beams (0.5 × 0.5 mm and 2 × 2 mm, 120 keV) on cylindrical tungsten anodes with radii from 1 to 5 cm and polar angles from 20.5° to 71.8°. Energy deposition profiles, dimensions, and photon fluence distributions were analyzed using the FLUKA MC package, with mapping in cylindrical coordinates (r-ϕ-z).
Results
Energy deposition profiles varied with beam position and anode curvature. The axial full width at half maximum (FWHM) increased by up to 650% at larger polar angles, while the azimuthal FWHM decreased up to 50%. Larger anode radii reduced the azimuthal FWHM by up to 78%, with minimal changes in axial and radial components. Narrower beams (0.5 × 0.5 mm2) produced smaller, more symmetric energy deposition profiles on anode surface. Overshoot occurred at small radii and large polar angles, leading to incomplete energy deposition.
Conclusions
Larger anode radii and moderate polar angles minimized energy deposition profiles distortion and improved X-ray fluence uniformity and production efficiency. Overshooting at small radii and large angles caused deformation, emphasizing the need for precise beam positioning to balance distortion, uniformity, and efficiency. These results define the geometric limits for effective energy deposition profile formation in cylindrical anode systems.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission.
JACMP will publish:
-Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500.
-Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed.
-Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references.
-Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents.
-Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews.
-Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics.
-Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic