Quality assurance of single isocentre multiple target stereotactic radiosurgery: Findings from long-term off-axis Winston-Lutz testing and machine performance checks

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Joel Poder, Robert Chambers, Harry Porter, Ryan Brown, Dylan Koprivec, Johnson Yuen, Rebecca Quezeda, Lisa Nourbehesht, Andrew Howie
{"title":"Quality assurance of single isocentre multiple target stereotactic radiosurgery: Findings from long-term off-axis Winston-Lutz testing and machine performance checks","authors":"Joel Poder,&nbsp;Robert Chambers,&nbsp;Harry Porter,&nbsp;Ryan Brown,&nbsp;Dylan Koprivec,&nbsp;Johnson Yuen,&nbsp;Rebecca Quezeda,&nbsp;Lisa Nourbehesht,&nbsp;Andrew Howie","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Single-isocenter multiple-target stereotactic radiosurgery (SIMT SRS) has emerged as an efficient treatment for multiple brain metastases. However, this technique demands exceptional geometric accuracy, particularly off-axis, to ensure optimal dose delivery while sparing healthy tissue. Traditional quality assurance (QA) methods require adaptation for SIMT SRS, highlighting the need for robust testing protocols.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to evaluate the long-term off-axis targeting accuracy of three Varian TrueBeam linear accelerators using a dedicated off-axis Winston–Lutz test (OAWLT) and to investigate correlations with routine varian machine performance check (MPC) results.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials &amp; Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Weekly OAWLT measurements were performed over a 6-month period on three TrueBeam linacs using the Sun Nuclear StereoPHAN phantom and MultiMet-WL cube. The test delivered 6 MV flattening filter-free beams to multiple off-axis targets via eight beam orientations, simulating clinical SIMT SRS workflows. Concurrently, daily MPC assessments evaluated geometric parameters including isocenter size, kV isocenter offset, beam center, and couch radiation-induced offset.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Median OAWLT errors were 0.38, 0.44, and 0.59 mm for the three linacs included in this study, with maximum errors of 1.12, 1.08, and 1.54 mm. Notably, off-axis errors increased with target off-axis distance, with the worst performance observed at 7 cm off-axis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Routine OAWLT is an effective and sensitive QA tool for monitoring off-axis targeting accuracy in SIMT SRS. Despite the convenience of daily MPC, it cannot substitute for a dedicated OAWLT. The study supports implementing weekly OAWLT in clinical practice to ensure high-quality, consistent treatment delivery for SIMT SRS treatments.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"26 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12483765/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.70275","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Single-isocenter multiple-target stereotactic radiosurgery (SIMT SRS) has emerged as an efficient treatment for multiple brain metastases. However, this technique demands exceptional geometric accuracy, particularly off-axis, to ensure optimal dose delivery while sparing healthy tissue. Traditional quality assurance (QA) methods require adaptation for SIMT SRS, highlighting the need for robust testing protocols.

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate the long-term off-axis targeting accuracy of three Varian TrueBeam linear accelerators using a dedicated off-axis Winston–Lutz test (OAWLT) and to investigate correlations with routine varian machine performance check (MPC) results.

Materials & Methods

Weekly OAWLT measurements were performed over a 6-month period on three TrueBeam linacs using the Sun Nuclear StereoPHAN phantom and MultiMet-WL cube. The test delivered 6 MV flattening filter-free beams to multiple off-axis targets via eight beam orientations, simulating clinical SIMT SRS workflows. Concurrently, daily MPC assessments evaluated geometric parameters including isocenter size, kV isocenter offset, beam center, and couch radiation-induced offset.

Results

Median OAWLT errors were 0.38, 0.44, and 0.59 mm for the three linacs included in this study, with maximum errors of 1.12, 1.08, and 1.54 mm. Notably, off-axis errors increased with target off-axis distance, with the worst performance observed at 7 cm off-axis.

Conclusion

Routine OAWLT is an effective and sensitive QA tool for monitoring off-axis targeting accuracy in SIMT SRS. Despite the convenience of daily MPC, it cannot substitute for a dedicated OAWLT. The study supports implementing weekly OAWLT in clinical practice to ensure high-quality, consistent treatment delivery for SIMT SRS treatments.

Abstract Image

单等中心多靶点立体定向放射手术的质量保证:来自长期离轴Winston-Lutz测试和机器性能检查的结果。
背景:单等中心多靶点立体定向放射手术(SIMT SRS)已成为多发性脑转移瘤的有效治疗方法。然而,这种技术需要特殊的几何精度,特别是离轴,以确保最佳剂量传递,同时保留健康组织。传统的质量保证(QA)方法需要适应SIMT SRS,突出了对健壮测试协议的需求。目的:本研究旨在利用专用的离轴温斯顿-卢茨试验(OAWLT)评估三台瓦里安TrueBeam直线加速器的长期离轴瞄准精度,并探讨其与常规瓦里安机器性能检查(MPC)结果的相关性。材料和方法:在6个月的时间里,使用Sun Nuclear StereoPHAN幻影和MultiMet-WL立方体在3台TrueBeam直线机上进行每周OAWLT测量。该试验通过8种光束方向向多个离轴目标发射6 MV无滤波平坦光束,模拟临床SIMT SRS工作流程。同时,每日MPC评估几何参数,包括等中心尺寸、kV等中心偏移、光束中心和沙发辐射诱导偏移。结果:本研究纳入的三个线性模型的OAWLT中位误差分别为0.38、0.44和0.59 mm,最大误差分别为1.12、1.08和1.54 mm。值得注意的是,离轴误差随着目标离轴距离的增加而增加,在离轴7 cm时表现最差。结论:常规OAWLT是监测SIMT SRS离轴瞄准精度的有效、灵敏的QA工具。尽管日常MPC很方便,但它不能代替专用的OAWLT。该研究支持在临床实践中实施每周OAWLT,以确保SIMT SRS治疗的高质量,一致的治疗交付。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
19.00%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission. JACMP will publish: -Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500. -Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed. -Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references. -Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents. -Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews. -Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics. -Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信