Quality assurance of single isocentre multiple target stereotactic radiosurgery: Findings from long-term off-axis Winston-Lutz testing and machine performance checks
IF 2.2 4区 医学Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Joel Poder, Robert Chambers, Harry Porter, Ryan Brown, Dylan Koprivec, Johnson Yuen, Rebecca Quezeda, Lisa Nourbehesht, Andrew Howie
{"title":"Quality assurance of single isocentre multiple target stereotactic radiosurgery: Findings from long-term off-axis Winston-Lutz testing and machine performance checks","authors":"Joel Poder, Robert Chambers, Harry Porter, Ryan Brown, Dylan Koprivec, Johnson Yuen, Rebecca Quezeda, Lisa Nourbehesht, Andrew Howie","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Single-isocenter multiple-target stereotactic radiosurgery (SIMT SRS) has emerged as an efficient treatment for multiple brain metastases. However, this technique demands exceptional geometric accuracy, particularly off-axis, to ensure optimal dose delivery while sparing healthy tissue. Traditional quality assurance (QA) methods require adaptation for SIMT SRS, highlighting the need for robust testing protocols.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to evaluate the long-term off-axis targeting accuracy of three Varian TrueBeam linear accelerators using a dedicated off-axis Winston–Lutz test (OAWLT) and to investigate correlations with routine varian machine performance check (MPC) results.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials & Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Weekly OAWLT measurements were performed over a 6-month period on three TrueBeam linacs using the Sun Nuclear StereoPHAN phantom and MultiMet-WL cube. The test delivered 6 MV flattening filter-free beams to multiple off-axis targets via eight beam orientations, simulating clinical SIMT SRS workflows. Concurrently, daily MPC assessments evaluated geometric parameters including isocenter size, kV isocenter offset, beam center, and couch radiation-induced offset.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Median OAWLT errors were 0.38, 0.44, and 0.59 mm for the three linacs included in this study, with maximum errors of 1.12, 1.08, and 1.54 mm. Notably, off-axis errors increased with target off-axis distance, with the worst performance observed at 7 cm off-axis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Routine OAWLT is an effective and sensitive QA tool for monitoring off-axis targeting accuracy in SIMT SRS. Despite the convenience of daily MPC, it cannot substitute for a dedicated OAWLT. The study supports implementing weekly OAWLT in clinical practice to ensure high-quality, consistent treatment delivery for SIMT SRS treatments.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"26 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12483765/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.70275","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Single-isocenter multiple-target stereotactic radiosurgery (SIMT SRS) has emerged as an efficient treatment for multiple brain metastases. However, this technique demands exceptional geometric accuracy, particularly off-axis, to ensure optimal dose delivery while sparing healthy tissue. Traditional quality assurance (QA) methods require adaptation for SIMT SRS, highlighting the need for robust testing protocols.
Purpose
This study aimed to evaluate the long-term off-axis targeting accuracy of three Varian TrueBeam linear accelerators using a dedicated off-axis Winston–Lutz test (OAWLT) and to investigate correlations with routine varian machine performance check (MPC) results.
Materials & Methods
Weekly OAWLT measurements were performed over a 6-month period on three TrueBeam linacs using the Sun Nuclear StereoPHAN phantom and MultiMet-WL cube. The test delivered 6 MV flattening filter-free beams to multiple off-axis targets via eight beam orientations, simulating clinical SIMT SRS workflows. Concurrently, daily MPC assessments evaluated geometric parameters including isocenter size, kV isocenter offset, beam center, and couch radiation-induced offset.
Results
Median OAWLT errors were 0.38, 0.44, and 0.59 mm for the three linacs included in this study, with maximum errors of 1.12, 1.08, and 1.54 mm. Notably, off-axis errors increased with target off-axis distance, with the worst performance observed at 7 cm off-axis.
Conclusion
Routine OAWLT is an effective and sensitive QA tool for monitoring off-axis targeting accuracy in SIMT SRS. Despite the convenience of daily MPC, it cannot substitute for a dedicated OAWLT. The study supports implementing weekly OAWLT in clinical practice to ensure high-quality, consistent treatment delivery for SIMT SRS treatments.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission.
JACMP will publish:
-Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500.
-Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed.
-Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references.
-Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents.
-Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews.
-Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics.
-Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic