Characterizing geometrical distortions in MRI for radiotherapy: Evaluating MR-SIM protocols and dose accuracy in stereotactic radiosurgery using AAPM TG-284 criteria

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Mojtaba Barzegar, Aram Rostami, Abbass Yousef Mkanna, Tarraf Torfeh, Satheesh Prasad Paloor, Ahamed Basith, Souha Aouadi, Rabih Hammoud, Noora Al Hammadi
{"title":"Characterizing geometrical distortions in MRI for radiotherapy: Evaluating MR-SIM protocols and dose accuracy in stereotactic radiosurgery using AAPM TG-284 criteria","authors":"Mojtaba Barzegar,&nbsp;Aram Rostami,&nbsp;Abbass Yousef Mkanna,&nbsp;Tarraf Torfeh,&nbsp;Satheesh Prasad Paloor,&nbsp;Ahamed Basith,&nbsp;Souha Aouadi,&nbsp;Rabih Hammoud,&nbsp;Noora Al Hammadi","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is crucial for diagnostic imaging and radiotherapy (RT) planning due to its superior soft tissue contrast. However, geometric distortions can affect treatment accuracy. This study evaluates the geometric accuracy of MRI protocols using a 1.5T MR-Sim scanner for RT and their dosimetric impacts.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Geometric distortion was assessed using the CIRS 604-GS MR Image Distortion Phantom with 2152 control points across various MRI sequences. A central cubic structure and surrounding regions were analyzed, totaling 27 structures. Rigid registration in Eclipse V18.1 aligned MRI images to CT images, with verified accuracy and visual inspection. An evaluation of the overlap and surface distance metrics was performed through MIM Mastro. Geometric distortion was quantified using 3D distortion analysis software, comparing marker coordinates to reference CT scans. Twenty-seven VMAT full arc plans were done in Eclipse on 27 paired structures, irradiated with 16 Gy in a single fraction at 6 MV energy using the Acuros XB algorithm</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>All 3D sequences demonstrated mean distortions of 0.4–0.5 mm, with maximum distortions of up to 3.3 mm in the TOF (time of flight) Angiography sequence. In contrast, the T2 TSE 2D sequence showed larger distortions (mean 1.4 mm, max. 9.7 mm). The center structure showed stable dosimetric performance (D<sub>mean</sub>: 1601.6 cGy for CT, 1600.3 cGy for MR). Peripheral regions showed higher variability, with MR<sub>normalized</sub> D<sub>95%</sub> values ranging from 83.9% to 88.1%.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Precise MR protocols are essential for accurate tumor delineation and RT planning. While all sequences showed acceptable accuracy, 3D sequences are superior for high-precision RT.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"26 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12481828/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.70199","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is crucial for diagnostic imaging and radiotherapy (RT) planning due to its superior soft tissue contrast. However, geometric distortions can affect treatment accuracy. This study evaluates the geometric accuracy of MRI protocols using a 1.5T MR-Sim scanner for RT and their dosimetric impacts.

Materials and Methods

Geometric distortion was assessed using the CIRS 604-GS MR Image Distortion Phantom with 2152 control points across various MRI sequences. A central cubic structure and surrounding regions were analyzed, totaling 27 structures. Rigid registration in Eclipse V18.1 aligned MRI images to CT images, with verified accuracy and visual inspection. An evaluation of the overlap and surface distance metrics was performed through MIM Mastro. Geometric distortion was quantified using 3D distortion analysis software, comparing marker coordinates to reference CT scans. Twenty-seven VMAT full arc plans were done in Eclipse on 27 paired structures, irradiated with 16 Gy in a single fraction at 6 MV energy using the Acuros XB algorithm

Results

All 3D sequences demonstrated mean distortions of 0.4–0.5 mm, with maximum distortions of up to 3.3 mm in the TOF (time of flight) Angiography sequence. In contrast, the T2 TSE 2D sequence showed larger distortions (mean 1.4 mm, max. 9.7 mm). The center structure showed stable dosimetric performance (Dmean: 1601.6 cGy for CT, 1600.3 cGy for MR). Peripheral regions showed higher variability, with MRnormalized D95% values ranging from 83.9% to 88.1%.

Conclusion

Precise MR protocols are essential for accurate tumor delineation and RT planning. While all sequences showed acceptable accuracy, 3D sequences are superior for high-precision RT.

Abstract Image

利用AAPM TG-284标准评估MR-SIM方案和立体定向放射外科的剂量准确性
目的:磁共振成像(MRI)由于其优越的软组织对比性,在诊断成像和放疗(RT)计划中起着至关重要的作用。然而,几何变形会影响治疗的准确性。本研究评估了使用1.5T MR-Sim扫描仪进行RT的MRI协议的几何精度及其剂量学影响。材料和方法:使用CIRS 604-GS MR图像失真模型评估几何畸变,在不同的MRI序列中有2152个控制点。分析了一个中心立方结构及其周围区域,共27个结构。Eclipse V18.1中的严格配准将MRI图像与CT图像对齐,具有经过验证的准确性和目视检查。通过MIM master进行了重叠和表面距离指标的评估。使用三维畸变分析软件量化几何畸变,将标记坐标与参考CT扫描进行比较。在Eclipse中对27个配对结构进行27个VMAT全弧计划,使用acros XB算法在6 MV能量的单个分数中照射16 Gy。结果:所有3D序列显示平均畸变为0.4-0.5 mm, TOF(飞行时间)血管造影序列的最大畸变高达3.3 mm。相比之下,T2 TSE 2D序列显示出更大的畸变(平均1.4 mm,最大。9.7毫米)。中心结构表现出稳定的剂量学性能(Dmean: CT 1601.6 cGy, MR 1600.3 cGy)。外周区域表现出更高的变异性,mr归一化D95%值在83.9% ~ 88.1%之间。结论:精确的MR方案对于准确的肿瘤描绘和RT计划至关重要。虽然所有序列都显示出可接受的精度,但3D序列在高精度RT中具有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
19.00%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission. JACMP will publish: -Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500. -Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed. -Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references. -Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents. -Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews. -Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics. -Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信