Characterizing geometrical distortions in MRI for radiotherapy: Evaluating MR-SIM protocols and dose accuracy in stereotactic radiosurgery using AAPM TG-284 criteria
IF 2.2 4区 医学Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
{"title":"Characterizing geometrical distortions in MRI for radiotherapy: Evaluating MR-SIM protocols and dose accuracy in stereotactic radiosurgery using AAPM TG-284 criteria","authors":"Mojtaba Barzegar, Aram Rostami, Abbass Yousef Mkanna, Tarraf Torfeh, Satheesh Prasad Paloor, Ahamed Basith, Souha Aouadi, Rabih Hammoud, Noora Al Hammadi","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is crucial for diagnostic imaging and radiotherapy (RT) planning due to its superior soft tissue contrast. However, geometric distortions can affect treatment accuracy. This study evaluates the geometric accuracy of MRI protocols using a 1.5T MR-Sim scanner for RT and their dosimetric impacts.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Geometric distortion was assessed using the CIRS 604-GS MR Image Distortion Phantom with 2152 control points across various MRI sequences. A central cubic structure and surrounding regions were analyzed, totaling 27 structures. Rigid registration in Eclipse V18.1 aligned MRI images to CT images, with verified accuracy and visual inspection. An evaluation of the overlap and surface distance metrics was performed through MIM Mastro. Geometric distortion was quantified using 3D distortion analysis software, comparing marker coordinates to reference CT scans. Twenty-seven VMAT full arc plans were done in Eclipse on 27 paired structures, irradiated with 16 Gy in a single fraction at 6 MV energy using the Acuros XB algorithm</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>All 3D sequences demonstrated mean distortions of 0.4–0.5 mm, with maximum distortions of up to 3.3 mm in the TOF (time of flight) Angiography sequence. In contrast, the T2 TSE 2D sequence showed larger distortions (mean 1.4 mm, max. 9.7 mm). The center structure showed stable dosimetric performance (D<sub>mean</sub>: 1601.6 cGy for CT, 1600.3 cGy for MR). Peripheral regions showed higher variability, with MR<sub>normalized</sub> D<sub>95%</sub> values ranging from 83.9% to 88.1%.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Precise MR protocols are essential for accurate tumor delineation and RT planning. While all sequences showed acceptable accuracy, 3D sequences are superior for high-precision RT.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"26 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12481828/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.70199","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is crucial for diagnostic imaging and radiotherapy (RT) planning due to its superior soft tissue contrast. However, geometric distortions can affect treatment accuracy. This study evaluates the geometric accuracy of MRI protocols using a 1.5T MR-Sim scanner for RT and their dosimetric impacts.
Materials and Methods
Geometric distortion was assessed using the CIRS 604-GS MR Image Distortion Phantom with 2152 control points across various MRI sequences. A central cubic structure and surrounding regions were analyzed, totaling 27 structures. Rigid registration in Eclipse V18.1 aligned MRI images to CT images, with verified accuracy and visual inspection. An evaluation of the overlap and surface distance metrics was performed through MIM Mastro. Geometric distortion was quantified using 3D distortion analysis software, comparing marker coordinates to reference CT scans. Twenty-seven VMAT full arc plans were done in Eclipse on 27 paired structures, irradiated with 16 Gy in a single fraction at 6 MV energy using the Acuros XB algorithm
Results
All 3D sequences demonstrated mean distortions of 0.4–0.5 mm, with maximum distortions of up to 3.3 mm in the TOF (time of flight) Angiography sequence. In contrast, the T2 TSE 2D sequence showed larger distortions (mean 1.4 mm, max. 9.7 mm). The center structure showed stable dosimetric performance (Dmean: 1601.6 cGy for CT, 1600.3 cGy for MR). Peripheral regions showed higher variability, with MRnormalized D95% values ranging from 83.9% to 88.1%.
Conclusion
Precise MR protocols are essential for accurate tumor delineation and RT planning. While all sequences showed acceptable accuracy, 3D sequences are superior for high-precision RT.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission.
JACMP will publish:
-Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500.
-Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed.
-Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references.
-Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents.
-Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews.
-Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics.
-Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic