Serial 12-Lead ECG-Based Deep-Learning Model for Hospital Admission Prediction in Emergency Department Cardiac Presentations: Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 2.2 Q2 Medicine
JMIR Cardio Pub Date : 2025-09-30 DOI:10.2196/80569
Arda Altintepe, Kutsev Bengisu Ozyoruk
{"title":"Serial 12-Lead ECG-Based Deep-Learning Model for Hospital Admission Prediction in Emergency Department Cardiac Presentations: Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Arda Altintepe, Kutsev Bengisu Ozyoruk","doi":"10.2196/80569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergency Department (ED) crowding is often attributed to a slow hospitalization process, leading to reduced quality of care. Predicting early disposition with cardiac-presenting patients is challenging: most are ultimately discharged, yet those with a cardiac etiology frequently require hospital admission. Existing scores rely on single-time-point data and often underperform when patient risk evolves during the visit.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop and validate a real-time deep-learning model that fuses serial 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) waveforms with sequential vitals and routinely available clinical data to predict hospital admission early in ED encounters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the MIMIC-IV, MIMIC-IV-ED, and MIMIC-IV-ECG databases. Adults presenting with chest pain, dyspnea, syncope, or presyncope and at least one ECG within their ED stay were included. Two evaluation cohorts were defined: all stays with ≥1 ECG (N=30,421) and a subset with ≥2 ECGs during the encounter (N=11,273). To predict hospital admission, we first established two baseline models: a tabular model (random forest) trained on structured clinical variables including demographics, triage acuity, past medical history, medications, and laboratory results, and an ECG-only model that learned directly from raw 12-lead waveforms. We then developed a multimodal deep-learning model that combined ECGs with sequential vital signs as well as the same static tabular features. All models were restricted to data available during the stay up to the time of the last ECG. Performance was assessed with stratified 5-fold cross-validation using identical splits across models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The multimodal model achieved an Area Under Receiver Operating Characteristic (AUROC) of 0.911 when trained on all eligible stays. The model predicted disposition after the final ECG was taken, which was a median of 0.3 hours after triage and 4.6 hours before ED departure. Baseline models performed worse: the ECG-only model had an AUROC of 0.852, and the tabular random forest had an AUROC of 0.886. In the subset requiring at least two ECGs within the stay, ECG-only reached an AUROC of 0.859, and random forest, with the longer interval to chart tabular data, reached a higher AUROC of 0.911. The multimodal model had AUROC 0.924, and outperformed baselines in each cohort (paired DeLong P<.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Serial ECGs, when integrated with evolving vitals and routine clinical features, enable accurate, early prediction of ED disposition in cardiac-presenting patients. This open-source, reproducible framework highlights the potential of multimodal deep learning to streamline ED flow, prioritize higher-risk cases, and detect evolving, time-critical pathology.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrial: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":14706,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Cardio","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Cardio","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/80569","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Emergency Department (ED) crowding is often attributed to a slow hospitalization process, leading to reduced quality of care. Predicting early disposition with cardiac-presenting patients is challenging: most are ultimately discharged, yet those with a cardiac etiology frequently require hospital admission. Existing scores rely on single-time-point data and often underperform when patient risk evolves during the visit.

Objective: To develop and validate a real-time deep-learning model that fuses serial 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) waveforms with sequential vitals and routinely available clinical data to predict hospital admission early in ED encounters.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the MIMIC-IV, MIMIC-IV-ED, and MIMIC-IV-ECG databases. Adults presenting with chest pain, dyspnea, syncope, or presyncope and at least one ECG within their ED stay were included. Two evaluation cohorts were defined: all stays with ≥1 ECG (N=30,421) and a subset with ≥2 ECGs during the encounter (N=11,273). To predict hospital admission, we first established two baseline models: a tabular model (random forest) trained on structured clinical variables including demographics, triage acuity, past medical history, medications, and laboratory results, and an ECG-only model that learned directly from raw 12-lead waveforms. We then developed a multimodal deep-learning model that combined ECGs with sequential vital signs as well as the same static tabular features. All models were restricted to data available during the stay up to the time of the last ECG. Performance was assessed with stratified 5-fold cross-validation using identical splits across models.

Results: The multimodal model achieved an Area Under Receiver Operating Characteristic (AUROC) of 0.911 when trained on all eligible stays. The model predicted disposition after the final ECG was taken, which was a median of 0.3 hours after triage and 4.6 hours before ED departure. Baseline models performed worse: the ECG-only model had an AUROC of 0.852, and the tabular random forest had an AUROC of 0.886. In the subset requiring at least two ECGs within the stay, ECG-only reached an AUROC of 0.859, and random forest, with the longer interval to chart tabular data, reached a higher AUROC of 0.911. The multimodal model had AUROC 0.924, and outperformed baselines in each cohort (paired DeLong P<.001).

Conclusions: Serial ECGs, when integrated with evolving vitals and routine clinical features, enable accurate, early prediction of ED disposition in cardiac-presenting patients. This open-source, reproducible framework highlights the potential of multimodal deep learning to streamline ED flow, prioritize higher-risk cases, and detect evolving, time-critical pathology.

Clinicaltrial:

基于连续12导联心电图的深度学习模型用于急诊科心脏病住院预测:回顾性队列研究。
背景:急诊科(ED)拥挤往往归因于缓慢的住院过程,导致护理质量下降。预测心脏病患者的早期处置是具有挑战性的:大多数患者最终出院,但那些有心脏病因的患者经常需要住院。现有的评分依赖于单时间点数据,当患者在就诊期间风险发生变化时,评分往往表现不佳。目的:开发并验证一种实时深度学习模型,该模型将连续12导联心电图(ECG)波形与连续生命体征和常规临床数据融合,以预测急诊早期住院情况。方法:我们使用MIMIC-IV、MIMIC-IV- ed和MIMIC-IV- ecg数据库进行了回顾性队列研究。以胸痛、呼吸困难、晕厥或晕厥前症状出现且在急诊科住院期间至少有一次心电图的成年人被纳入研究。定义了两个评估队列:所有患者心电图≥1张(N=30,421),以及遭遇时心电图≥2张的一个子集(N=11,273)。为了预测住院情况,我们首先建立了两个基线模型:一个表格模型(随机森林)训练结构化临床变量,包括人口统计学、分诊灵敏度、既往病史、药物和实验室结果,以及一个直接从原始12导联波形中学习的仅心电图模型。然后,我们开发了一个多模态深度学习模型,该模型将心电图与顺序生命体征以及相同的静态表格特征结合起来。所有的模型都局限于最后一次心电图时的可用数据。性能评估采用分层的5倍交叉验证,使用相同的模型分割。结果:当对所有符合条件的停留进行训练时,多模式模型的接受者工作特征下面积(AUROC)为0.911。该模型预测了最后一次心电图检查后的处置情况,中位数为分诊后0.3小时和ED离开前4.6小时。基线模型表现较差:仅心电图模型的AUROC为0.852,表格随机森林模型的AUROC为0.886。在住院期间至少需要两次心电图的子集中,心电图的AUROC仅为0.859,而随机森林的图表数据间隔较长,AUROC较高,为0.911。多模态模型的AUROC为0.924,并且在每个队列中都优于基线(配对DeLong p)。结论:当将连续心电图与不断变化的生命体征和常规临床特征相结合时,可以准确、早期地预测心脏病患者的ED倾向。这个开源的、可重复的框架突出了多模式深度学习在简化ED流程、优先考虑高风险病例和检测不断发展的、时间紧迫的病理方面的潜力。临床试验:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Cardio
JMIR Cardio Computer Science-Computer Science Applications
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信