Prevalence, Classification and Factors Associated With Cemental Tears-A Retrospective Observational Cross-Sectional Study in a Postgraduate Endodontic Clinic.

IF 7.1 1区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
A H C Lee, A W K Yeung, A Sigurdsson, M C M Wong, C F Zhang
{"title":"Prevalence, Classification and Factors Associated With Cemental Tears-A Retrospective Observational Cross-Sectional Study in a Postgraduate Endodontic Clinic.","authors":"A H C Lee, A W K Yeung, A Sigurdsson, M C M Wong, C F Zhang","doi":"10.1111/iej.70042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is a lack of epidemiology studies on cemental tears. This study aimed to (i) investigate the prevalence of cemental tears among the patients referred to a Postgraduate Endodontic Clinic, (ii) classify the cases diagnosed with cemental tears, and (iii) assess factors associated with cemental tears.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective, cross-sectional study included 445 cases/teeth recruited between 1 September 2019 and 31 March 2024 at a University Postgraduate Endodontic Clinic. Information was collated from the clinical records of case history, clinical findings and radiographic interpretations from periapical radiograph (PR) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. For each case/tooth, cemental tear/s were categorised as either absent or present, and those with cemental tear/s were further classified. Thirty potential factors were studied, including patient-, jaw-, tooth-, previous endodontic treatment and periodontal-related factors. Factors were individually tested using univariate analysis with Pearson chi-squared (exact) tests. Any significant factors identified were further subjected to multiple logistic regression analyses based on a forward stepwise regression model (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cemental tear/s were found in 25 out of 445 cases/teeth, with a prevalence of 5.6%. Sensitivity and specificity of PR in detecting cemental tears were 0.6 and 1.0, respectively. Most cases/teeth detected were classified as Class 2 and 4 (n = 19, 76%) or Stage C and D (n = 19, 76%). Mean age of the subjects with cemental tears was 58.7 years, with comparable prevalence between males and females. Most cases (72%) with cemental tear/s had root canal treatment initiated or completed. Incisors, increased tooth mobility, severe crestal bone loss and adequate root filling quality were significantly associated with the higher prevalence of cemental tears (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cemental tears should always be considered as a differential diagnosis in endodontic practice. Clinicians should be particularly vigilant for increased risks of cemental tears in incisors, mobile teeth, teeth exhibiting increased crestal bone loss and those with adequately filled root canals, as they may be misdiagnosed as periodontal-endodontic lesions. The use of CBCT is crucial for accurate diagnosis, guiding effective treatment planning and improving clinical outcomes in endodontic management.</p>","PeriodicalId":13724,"journal":{"name":"International endodontic journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International endodontic journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.70042","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: There is a lack of epidemiology studies on cemental tears. This study aimed to (i) investigate the prevalence of cemental tears among the patients referred to a Postgraduate Endodontic Clinic, (ii) classify the cases diagnosed with cemental tears, and (iii) assess factors associated with cemental tears.

Materials and methods: This retrospective, cross-sectional study included 445 cases/teeth recruited between 1 September 2019 and 31 March 2024 at a University Postgraduate Endodontic Clinic. Information was collated from the clinical records of case history, clinical findings and radiographic interpretations from periapical radiograph (PR) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. For each case/tooth, cemental tear/s were categorised as either absent or present, and those with cemental tear/s were further classified. Thirty potential factors were studied, including patient-, jaw-, tooth-, previous endodontic treatment and periodontal-related factors. Factors were individually tested using univariate analysis with Pearson chi-squared (exact) tests. Any significant factors identified were further subjected to multiple logistic regression analyses based on a forward stepwise regression model (p < 0.05).

Results: Cemental tear/s were found in 25 out of 445 cases/teeth, with a prevalence of 5.6%. Sensitivity and specificity of PR in detecting cemental tears were 0.6 and 1.0, respectively. Most cases/teeth detected were classified as Class 2 and 4 (n = 19, 76%) or Stage C and D (n = 19, 76%). Mean age of the subjects with cemental tears was 58.7 years, with comparable prevalence between males and females. Most cases (72%) with cemental tear/s had root canal treatment initiated or completed. Incisors, increased tooth mobility, severe crestal bone loss and adequate root filling quality were significantly associated with the higher prevalence of cemental tears (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Cemental tears should always be considered as a differential diagnosis in endodontic practice. Clinicians should be particularly vigilant for increased risks of cemental tears in incisors, mobile teeth, teeth exhibiting increased crestal bone loss and those with adequately filled root canals, as they may be misdiagnosed as periodontal-endodontic lesions. The use of CBCT is crucial for accurate diagnosis, guiding effective treatment planning and improving clinical outcomes in endodontic management.

骨水泥撕裂的患病率、分类及相关因素——一项牙髓临床研究生的回顾性观察性横断面研究。
前言:目前缺乏关于骨水泥撕裂的流行病学研究。本研究旨在(1)调查在牙髓学研究生诊所就诊的患者中牙髓撕裂的患病率,(2)对诊断为牙髓撕裂的病例进行分类,(3)评估与牙髓撕裂相关的因素。材料和方法:这项回顾性、横断面研究包括2019年9月1日至2024年3月31日在大学研究生牙髓诊所招募的445例病例/牙齿。从临床记录、临床表现和根尖周x线片(PR)和锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)图像的放射学解释中整理信息。对于每个病例/牙齿,骨水泥撕裂分为无骨水泥撕裂和有骨水泥撕裂两种,有骨水泥撕裂的患者进一步分类。研究了30个潜在因素,包括患者、颌骨、牙齿、以前的牙髓治疗和牙周相关因素。各因素分别采用单因素分析和皮尔逊卡方(精确)检验进行检验。结果:445例患者/牙齿中有25例出现骨水泥撕裂/s,患病率为5.6%。PR检测骨水泥撕裂的敏感性为0.6,特异性为1.0。多数病例/检出的牙齿属于2、4期(19.76%)或C、D期(19.76%)。骨水泥撕裂患者的平均年龄为58.7岁,男女患病率相当。大多数(72%)骨水泥撕裂患者已经开始或完成了根管治疗。门牙、增加的牙齿活动度、严重的牙冠骨丢失和足够的牙根填充质量与较高的牙髓撕裂发生率显著相关(p结论:牙髓撕裂应始终被视为牙髓治疗实践中的鉴别诊断。临床医生应特别警惕门牙、活动牙、牙冠骨质流失增加的牙齿和根管填充充分的牙齿的牙髓撕裂风险增加,因为它们可能被误诊为牙周-根管病变。在根管治疗中,CBCT的使用对于准确诊断、指导有效的治疗计划和改善临床结果至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International endodontic journal
International endodontic journal 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
28.00%
发文量
195
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Endodontic Journal is published monthly and strives to publish original articles of the highest quality to disseminate scientific and clinical knowledge; all manuscripts are subjected to peer review. Original scientific articles are published in the areas of biomedical science, applied materials science, bioengineering, epidemiology and social science relevant to endodontic disease and its management, and to the restoration of root-treated teeth. In addition, review articles, reports of clinical cases, book reviews, summaries and abstracts of scientific meetings and news items are accepted. The International Endodontic Journal is essential reading for general dental practitioners, specialist endodontists, research, scientists and dental teachers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信