Validation of artificial intelligence spirometry diagnostic support software in primary care: a blinded diagnostic accuracy study.

IF 4 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
ERJ Open Research Pub Date : 2025-09-29 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1183/23120541.00116-2025
Anthony Sunjaya, George D Edwards, Jennifer Harvey, Karl Sylvester, Joanna Purvis, Matthew Rutter, Joanna Shakespeare, Vicky Moore, Ethaar El-Emir, Gillian Doe, Karolien Van Orshoven, Suhani Patel, Maarten de Vos, Ahmed Elmahy, Benoit Cuyvers, Paul Desbordes, Satesh Sehdev, Rachael A Evans, Michael D Morgan, Richard Russell, Ian Jarrold, Nannette Spain, Stephanie Taylor, David A Scott, A Toby Prevost, Nicholas S Hopkinson, Samantha Kon, Marko Topalovic, William D-C Man
{"title":"Validation of artificial intelligence spirometry diagnostic support software in primary care: a blinded diagnostic accuracy study.","authors":"Anthony Sunjaya, George D Edwards, Jennifer Harvey, Karl Sylvester, Joanna Purvis, Matthew Rutter, Joanna Shakespeare, Vicky Moore, Ethaar El-Emir, Gillian Doe, Karolien Van Orshoven, Suhani Patel, Maarten de Vos, Ahmed Elmahy, Benoit Cuyvers, Paul Desbordes, Satesh Sehdev, Rachael A Evans, Michael D Morgan, Richard Russell, Ian Jarrold, Nannette Spain, Stephanie Taylor, David A Scott, A Toby Prevost, Nicholas S Hopkinson, Samantha Kon, Marko Topalovic, William D-C Man","doi":"10.1183/23120541.00116-2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective and design: </strong>The objective of the present study was to assess the discriminative accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) software to identify COPD and other chronic respiratory diseases from primary care spirometry. This was a diagnostic study with blinded analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective hand-held spirometry data from consecutive patients attending primary care clinics in Hillingdon (London, UK) between September 2015 and March 2019 were used. The index diagnosis was the \"preferred\" diagnosis determined by AI software (highest probability) using supervised random-forest machine learning to interpret raw spirometry data and basic demographics. The reference diagnosis was based on the consensus of expert pulmonologists with access to primary and secondary care medical notes and results of relevant investigations. Cross-tabulation of the index test results by the results of the reference standard for COPD and other respiratory disease categories provided the main outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this primary care spirometry dataset from 1113 patients, 543 (48.8%) had a reference diagnosis of COPD. AI preferred diagnosis detected 456, achieving a sensitivity of 84.0% (95% CI 80.6-87.0%), specificity of 86.8% (83.8-89.5%), accuracy of 85.4% (83.2-87.5%) with area under curve (AUC) of 0.914 (0.896-0.930). AI preferred diagnosis identified 187 out of 249 patients with reference diagnosis of interstitial lung disease and 59 out of 107 patients with asthma, with AUCs of 0.900 (0.880-0.916) and 0.814 (0.790-0.836), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AI software achieved high sensitivity and specificity in identifying COPD using spirometry and basic demographic data and may support accurate diagnosis of COPD in primary care. AI software performed less well for other chronic respiratory disease categories.</p>","PeriodicalId":11739,"journal":{"name":"ERJ Open Research","volume":"11 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12477482/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERJ Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00116-2025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective and design: The objective of the present study was to assess the discriminative accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) software to identify COPD and other chronic respiratory diseases from primary care spirometry. This was a diagnostic study with blinded analysis.

Methods: Retrospective hand-held spirometry data from consecutive patients attending primary care clinics in Hillingdon (London, UK) between September 2015 and March 2019 were used. The index diagnosis was the "preferred" diagnosis determined by AI software (highest probability) using supervised random-forest machine learning to interpret raw spirometry data and basic demographics. The reference diagnosis was based on the consensus of expert pulmonologists with access to primary and secondary care medical notes and results of relevant investigations. Cross-tabulation of the index test results by the results of the reference standard for COPD and other respiratory disease categories provided the main outcome measures.

Results: In this primary care spirometry dataset from 1113 patients, 543 (48.8%) had a reference diagnosis of COPD. AI preferred diagnosis detected 456, achieving a sensitivity of 84.0% (95% CI 80.6-87.0%), specificity of 86.8% (83.8-89.5%), accuracy of 85.4% (83.2-87.5%) with area under curve (AUC) of 0.914 (0.896-0.930). AI preferred diagnosis identified 187 out of 249 patients with reference diagnosis of interstitial lung disease and 59 out of 107 patients with asthma, with AUCs of 0.900 (0.880-0.916) and 0.814 (0.790-0.836), respectively.

Conclusion: AI software achieved high sensitivity and specificity in identifying COPD using spirometry and basic demographic data and may support accurate diagnosis of COPD in primary care. AI software performed less well for other chronic respiratory disease categories.

Abstract Image

初级保健中人工智能肺活量测定诊断支持软件的验证:一项盲法诊断准确性研究。
目的和设计:本研究的目的是评估人工智能(AI)软件从初级保健肺活量测定中识别COPD和其他慢性呼吸系统疾病的判别准确性。本研究为盲法诊断性研究。方法:使用2015年9月至2019年3月期间在希灵顿(英国伦敦)初级保健诊所连续就诊的患者的回顾性手持式肺活量测定数据。指数诊断是由人工智能软件(最高概率)使用监督随机森林机器学习来解释原始肺活量测定数据和基本人口统计数据确定的“首选”诊断。参考诊断是基于肺病专家的共识,获得初级和二级保健医疗记录和相关调查结果。COPD及其他呼吸系统疾病类别参考标准的结果与指标测试结果交叉制表提供了主要的结局指标。结果:在这个来自1113例患者的初级保健肺活量测定数据集中,543例(48.8%)有COPD的参考诊断。人工智能优选诊断456例,灵敏度84.0% (95% CI 80.6 ~ 87.0%),特异性86.8%(83.8 ~ 89.5%),准确率85.4%(83.2 ~ 87.5%),曲线下面积(AUC)为0.914(0.896 ~ 0.930)。249例参考诊断为间质性肺疾病的患者中,AI优选诊断为187例;107例哮喘患者中,AI优选诊断为59例,auc分别为0.900(0.880-0.916)和0.814(0.790-0.836)。结论:人工智能软件在肺活量测定和基本人口统计学数据识别COPD方面具有较高的敏感性和特异性,可支持初级保健中COPD的准确诊断。人工智能软件在其他慢性呼吸道疾病方面表现不佳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ERJ Open Research
ERJ Open Research Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
273
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: ERJ Open Research is a fully open access original research journal, published online by the European Respiratory Society. The journal aims to publish high-quality work in all fields of respiratory science and medicine, covering basic science, clinical translational science and clinical medicine. The journal was created to help fulfil the ERS objective to disseminate scientific and educational material to its members and to the medical community, but also to provide researchers with an affordable open access specialty journal in which to publish their work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信