Evaluation of Hospital Antibiotic Consumption during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

IF 0.7 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Biljana Lazarova, Biljana Eftimova, Maja Simonoska Crcarevska, Tamara Tashkov, Dijana Miceva, Zorica Naumovska
{"title":"Evaluation of Hospital Antibiotic Consumption during the COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Biljana Lazarova, Biljana Eftimova, Maja Simonoska Crcarevska, Tamara Tashkov, Dijana Miceva, Zorica Naumovska","doi":"10.2174/0115748863385928250911004158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a pressing global health issue exacerbated by the overuse of antibiotics during the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite WHO guidelines against antibiotics for mild-to-moderate COVID-19 cases without bacterial co-infection, significant misuse has been reported globally. This study aimed to evaluate antibiotic consumption during the COVID-19 pandemic at a hospital in North Macedonia and to analyze adherence to WHO guidelines, with a focus on antimicrobial stewardship, using the ATC and WHO AWaRe classification systems.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze antibiotic utilization trends from January 2020 to December 2021 and assess adherence to WHO guidelines, focusing on the potential impact on AMR.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This retrospective observational study measured antibiotic consumption in defined daily doses (DDD) per 100 occupied bed-days (DDD/100 OBD) using ATC and WHO AWaRe classifications. Data were obtained only from ICU inpatients treated at the Clinical Hospital in Shtip, North Macedonia. Trends in annual consumption were analyzed, including rate-of-change calculations for individual antibiotics between 2020 and 2021.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Total antibiotic consumption decreased from 2902.6 DDD/100 OBD in 2020 to 2286.5 DDD/100 OBD in 2021. A third-generation cephalosporin, ceftriaxone, was the most consumed antibiotic, accounting for 57.62% of total consumption in 2020 and 48.55% in 2021. Tetracycline use slightly increased from 13.88% in 2020 to 15.83% in 2021. Fluoroquinolone use decreased significantly from 15.22% in 2020 to 6.5% in 2021. Carbapenem consumption rose sharply from 1.7% in 2020 to 14.37% in 2021, while azithromycin use declined threefold. Antibiotics in the Access group accounted for less than 20% of total usage, while those in the Watch group predominated.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The study highlights a continued reliance on broad-spectrum antibiotics during the pandemic, diverging from WHO recommendations emphasizing Access to antibiotics. These trends suggest inadequate implementation of antimicrobial stewardship practices and raise concerns about their long-term impact on AMR. Limitations include the retrospective, single-center design, which may limit the generalizability of the findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings underscore the high dependency on Watch category antibiotics and a limited focus on Access antibiotics, contrary to WHO recommendations. This highlights the urgent need for robust antimicrobial stewardship programs to control inappropriate antibiotic use and combat AMR.</p>","PeriodicalId":10777,"journal":{"name":"Current drug safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current drug safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115748863385928250911004158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a pressing global health issue exacerbated by the overuse of antibiotics during the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite WHO guidelines against antibiotics for mild-to-moderate COVID-19 cases without bacterial co-infection, significant misuse has been reported globally. This study aimed to evaluate antibiotic consumption during the COVID-19 pandemic at a hospital in North Macedonia and to analyze adherence to WHO guidelines, with a focus on antimicrobial stewardship, using the ATC and WHO AWaRe classification systems.

Objective: To analyze antibiotic utilization trends from January 2020 to December 2021 and assess adherence to WHO guidelines, focusing on the potential impact on AMR.

Method: This retrospective observational study measured antibiotic consumption in defined daily doses (DDD) per 100 occupied bed-days (DDD/100 OBD) using ATC and WHO AWaRe classifications. Data were obtained only from ICU inpatients treated at the Clinical Hospital in Shtip, North Macedonia. Trends in annual consumption were analyzed, including rate-of-change calculations for individual antibiotics between 2020 and 2021.

Result: Total antibiotic consumption decreased from 2902.6 DDD/100 OBD in 2020 to 2286.5 DDD/100 OBD in 2021. A third-generation cephalosporin, ceftriaxone, was the most consumed antibiotic, accounting for 57.62% of total consumption in 2020 and 48.55% in 2021. Tetracycline use slightly increased from 13.88% in 2020 to 15.83% in 2021. Fluoroquinolone use decreased significantly from 15.22% in 2020 to 6.5% in 2021. Carbapenem consumption rose sharply from 1.7% in 2020 to 14.37% in 2021, while azithromycin use declined threefold. Antibiotics in the Access group accounted for less than 20% of total usage, while those in the Watch group predominated.

Discussion: The study highlights a continued reliance on broad-spectrum antibiotics during the pandemic, diverging from WHO recommendations emphasizing Access to antibiotics. These trends suggest inadequate implementation of antimicrobial stewardship practices and raise concerns about their long-term impact on AMR. Limitations include the retrospective, single-center design, which may limit the generalizability of the findings.

Conclusion: The findings underscore the high dependency on Watch category antibiotics and a limited focus on Access antibiotics, contrary to WHO recommendations. This highlights the urgent need for robust antimicrobial stewardship programs to control inappropriate antibiotic use and combat AMR.

COVID-19大流行期间医院抗生素使用情况评估
导言:抗微生物药物耐药性是一个紧迫的全球卫生问题,在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,抗生素的过度使用加剧了这一问题。尽管世卫组织制定了针对无细菌合并感染的轻至中度COVID-19病例的抗生素指导方针,但全球仍有严重滥用抗生素的报告。本研究旨在利用ATC和世卫组织AWaRe分类系统,评估北马其顿一家医院在COVID-19大流行期间的抗生素使用情况,并分析对世卫组织指南的遵守情况,重点是抗菌药物管理。目的:分析2020年1月至2021年12月抗生素使用趋势,评估对世卫组织指南的遵守情况,重点关注对抗生素耐药性的潜在影响。方法:这项回顾性观察性研究使用ATC和WHO AWaRe分类,以每100个已占用的卧床日(DDD/100 OBD)的定义日剂量(DDD/100 OBD)测量抗生素消耗。数据仅来自北马其顿Shtip临床医院ICU住院患者。分析了年度消费趋势,包括2020年至2021年期间个体抗生素的变化率计算。结果:抗生素总消费量由2020年的2902.6 DDD/100 OBD下降至2021年的2286.5 DDD/100 OBD。第三代头孢菌素头孢曲松是消费量最大的抗生素,2020年占总消费量的57.62%,2021年占总消费量的48.55%。四环素的使用从2020年的13.88%略微增加到2021年的15.83%。氟喹诺酮类药物的使用率从2020年的15.22%大幅下降至2021年的6.5%。碳青霉烯的消费量从2020年的1.7%急剧上升至2021年的14.37%,而阿奇霉素的使用量下降了三倍。获取组的抗生素占总使用量的不到20%,而观察组的抗生素占主导地位。讨论:该研究强调了大流行期间对广谱抗生素的持续依赖,这与世卫组织强调获得抗生素的建议有所不同。这些趋势表明抗菌素管理实践的实施不足,并引起人们对其对抗生素耐药性的长期影响的关注。局限性包括回顾性、单中心设计,这可能限制研究结果的普遍性。结论:与世卫组织的建议相反,调查结果强调了对观察类抗生素的高度依赖和对可及抗生素的有限关注。这突出表明迫切需要强有力的抗菌素管理规划,以控制不适当的抗生素使用和对抗抗生素耐药性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current drug safety
Current drug safety PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
112
期刊介绍: Current Drug Safety publishes frontier articles on all the latest advances on drug safety. The journal aims to publish the highest quality research articles, reviews and case reports in the field. Topics covered include: adverse effects of individual drugs and drug classes, management of adverse effects, pharmacovigilance and pharmacoepidemiology of new and existing drugs, post-marketing surveillance. The journal is essential reading for all researchers and clinicians involved in drug safety.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信