Physical, cognitive, and mental health impacts of Omicron reinfection in patients with original SARS-CoV-2 infection: a community-based observational study.

IF 8.3 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Sizhen Su, Zhendong Jiang, Le Shi, Xiaoxing Liu, Zhibo Zhang, Huan Mei, Nan Gao, Shuilin Wu, Mingzhe Li, Xiong Zhang, Aijun Zhang, Chunlian Tang, Yongbo Zheng, Yimiao Zhao, Na Zeng, Shuyu Ni, Wei Yan, Kai Yuan, Yankun Sun, Yi Hong, Yu Lu, Jie Shi, Yanping Bao, Xiangyou Li, Lin Lu
{"title":"Physical, cognitive, and mental health impacts of Omicron reinfection in patients with original SARS-CoV-2 infection: a community-based observational study.","authors":"Sizhen Su, Zhendong Jiang, Le Shi, Xiaoxing Liu, Zhibo Zhang, Huan Mei, Nan Gao, Shuilin Wu, Mingzhe Li, Xiong Zhang, Aijun Zhang, Chunlian Tang, Yongbo Zheng, Yimiao Zhao, Na Zeng, Shuyu Ni, Wei Yan, Kai Yuan, Yankun Sun, Yi Hong, Yu Lu, Jie Shi, Yanping Bao, Xiangyou Li, Lin Lu","doi":"10.1186/s12916-025-04322-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Epidemiological and clinical evidence suggests that severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) reinfection is a complication in a proportion of patients reporting ongoing health issues. However, most studies in the field of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection have focused only on self-reported symptoms and lacked long-term objective measurements. This study aimed to estimate the pattern of chronic symptoms of Omicron reinfection in patients with original SARS-CoV-2 infection by comprehensively assessments 3 years after recovery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This community-based observational study was conducted in Wuhan, China, between January and April in 2023. All participants were recruited from community and invited to participate the interview and examination in a hospital. The subjective multi-system symptoms were self-reported. The objective radiological features and laboratory data were assessed by measuring blood inflammation and performing chest computed tomography (CT) and pulse oxygen saturation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1438 individuals who participated in the study, 144 were infected with the original variant only in 2020, 980 were Omicron-infected in 2023, 215 were reinfected both in 2020 and 2023, and 99 were never infected. Compared with the non-infection group, the reinfection (odds ratio (OR), 5.15 [95% confidence intervals (CIs), 2.96-8.96]) group was associated with the highest risk of any of chronic physical symptoms, followed by the Omicron infection (3.45 [2.19-5.44]) and original variant infection (2.90 [1.63-5.15]) groups. Compared with the non-infection group, the reinfection (4.05 [2.30-7.14]), Omicron infection (3.72 [2.26-6.11]), and original variant infection (2.71 [1.48-4.95]) groups were associated with an increased risk of any of chronic mental symptoms. Moreover, of all groups, the reinfection group reported the highest seropositivity rate for C-reactive protein, and the highest prevalence rates of ground glass opacities on chest CT and hypoxaemia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results suggest that reinfection may be a risk factor for long COVID conditions. These findings provide information for the clinical management and healthcare services of long COVID and SARS-CoV-2 reinfection and highlight the importance taking necessary action to prepare for a future pandemic. The long-term follow-up will be needed to verify the impact of different SARS-CoV-2 infection status on long COVID in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":9188,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medicine","volume":"23 1","pages":"526"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12482364/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-025-04322-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Epidemiological and clinical evidence suggests that severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) reinfection is a complication in a proportion of patients reporting ongoing health issues. However, most studies in the field of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection have focused only on self-reported symptoms and lacked long-term objective measurements. This study aimed to estimate the pattern of chronic symptoms of Omicron reinfection in patients with original SARS-CoV-2 infection by comprehensively assessments 3 years after recovery.

Methods: This community-based observational study was conducted in Wuhan, China, between January and April in 2023. All participants were recruited from community and invited to participate the interview and examination in a hospital. The subjective multi-system symptoms were self-reported. The objective radiological features and laboratory data were assessed by measuring blood inflammation and performing chest computed tomography (CT) and pulse oxygen saturation.

Results: Among 1438 individuals who participated in the study, 144 were infected with the original variant only in 2020, 980 were Omicron-infected in 2023, 215 were reinfected both in 2020 and 2023, and 99 were never infected. Compared with the non-infection group, the reinfection (odds ratio (OR), 5.15 [95% confidence intervals (CIs), 2.96-8.96]) group was associated with the highest risk of any of chronic physical symptoms, followed by the Omicron infection (3.45 [2.19-5.44]) and original variant infection (2.90 [1.63-5.15]) groups. Compared with the non-infection group, the reinfection (4.05 [2.30-7.14]), Omicron infection (3.72 [2.26-6.11]), and original variant infection (2.71 [1.48-4.95]) groups were associated with an increased risk of any of chronic mental symptoms. Moreover, of all groups, the reinfection group reported the highest seropositivity rate for C-reactive protein, and the highest prevalence rates of ground glass opacities on chest CT and hypoxaemia.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that reinfection may be a risk factor for long COVID conditions. These findings provide information for the clinical management and healthcare services of long COVID and SARS-CoV-2 reinfection and highlight the importance taking necessary action to prepare for a future pandemic. The long-term follow-up will be needed to verify the impact of different SARS-CoV-2 infection status on long COVID in the future.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

原SARS-CoV-2感染患者再感染Omicron对身体、认知和心理健康的影响:一项基于社区的观察性研究
背景:流行病学和临床证据表明,严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒-2 (SARS-CoV-2)再感染是报告持续健康问题的一部分患者的并发症。然而,在SARS-CoV-2再感染领域的大多数研究只关注自我报告的症状,缺乏长期的客观测量。本研究旨在通过对原SARS-CoV-2感染患者康复后3年的综合评估,评估其再感染Omicron的慢性症状模式。方法:该观察性研究于2023年1 - 4月在中国武汉进行。所有参与者均从社区中招募,并邀请他们在医院参加面试和考试。主观多系统症状自述。通过测量血液炎症、胸部计算机断层扫描(CT)和脉搏血氧饱和度来评估客观影像学特征和实验室数据。结果:在1438名参与研究的个体中,144人仅在2020年感染了原始变体,980人在2023年感染了ommicon, 215人在2020年和2023年都再次感染,99人从未感染。与未感染组相比,再感染组(优势比为5.15[95%可信区间为2.96 ~ 8.96])出现任何慢性身体症状的风险最高,其次是Omicron感染组(优势比为3.45[2.19 ~ 5.44])和原始变异感染组(优势比为2.90[1.63 ~ 5.15])。与未感染组相比,再感染组(4.05[2.30-7.14])、Omicron感染组(3.72[2.26-6.11])和原始变异感染组(2.71[1.48-4.95])与任何慢性精神症状的风险增加相关。此外,在所有组中,再感染组报告的c反应蛋白血清阳性率最高,胸部CT磨玻璃影和低氧血症患病率最高。结论:我们的研究结果表明,再感染可能是长期COVID条件的危险因素。这些发现为长期COVID和SARS-CoV-2再感染的临床管理和医疗服务提供了信息,并强调了采取必要行动为未来大流行做好准备的重要性。未来需要长期随访验证不同SARS-CoV-2感染状态对长期COVID的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medicine
BMC Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
1.10%
发文量
435
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medicine is an open access, transparent peer-reviewed general medical journal. It is the flagship journal of the BMC series and publishes outstanding and influential research in various areas including clinical practice, translational medicine, medical and health advances, public health, global health, policy, and general topics of interest to the biomedical and sociomedical professional communities. In addition to research articles, the journal also publishes stimulating debates, reviews, unique forum articles, and concise tutorials. All articles published in BMC Medicine are included in various databases such as Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAS, Citebase, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, OAIster, SCImago, Scopus, SOCOLAR, and Zetoc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信