Patients' and healthcare personnel's experiences of a health-literacy intervention in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease - a qualitative study.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Marie Hamilton Larsen, Astrid Klopstad Wahl, Christine Raaheim Borge
{"title":"Patients' and healthcare personnel's experiences of a health-literacy intervention in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease - a qualitative study.","authors":"Marie Hamilton Larsen, Astrid Klopstad Wahl, Christine Raaheim Borge","doi":"10.1186/s12913-025-13299-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) poses challenges to people's self-management, especially after hospital discharge. Few studies have qualitatively examined the experiences of patients and healthcare personnel following a nurse-led health literacy intervention to prevent readmission.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This exploratory qualitative process evaluation was conducted within a randomized controlled trial aimed at understanding the perspectives of both patients and professionals following the implementation of a health literacy intervention. The intervention includes home visits conducted by nurses trained in COPD, employing motivational interviewing techniques and supporting the development of individualised treatment plans post-hospital discharge. Eight semi-structured interviews with patients, one focus group, and one individual interview with healthcare providers (n = 6) were analysed using inductive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two main themes arose among patients: \"Building health literacy through personalized nursing support\" and \"From knowledge to action: Strengthening health literacy through motivational support\" - and two among healthcare professionals; \"Health professionals' experience of developing health literacy competency\" and \"Perceived shifts in understanding, roles, and relationships through health literacy awareness\".</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The nurse-led health literacy intervention was perceived as valuable by both patients and healthcare professionals. Patients described how home-based support from competent nurses may have contributed to a better understanding of post-discharge care and fostered a sense of preparedness. Professionals reported gaining insights into patient needs, which they felt enabled more tailored communication and care planning. While the findings are based on a small qualitative sample, they suggest that such interventions may support the transition from hospital to home.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The RCT study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT03216603 (registered first 7/7-2017).</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"1256"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12482015/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-13299-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) poses challenges to people's self-management, especially after hospital discharge. Few studies have qualitatively examined the experiences of patients and healthcare personnel following a nurse-led health literacy intervention to prevent readmission.

Methods: This exploratory qualitative process evaluation was conducted within a randomized controlled trial aimed at understanding the perspectives of both patients and professionals following the implementation of a health literacy intervention. The intervention includes home visits conducted by nurses trained in COPD, employing motivational interviewing techniques and supporting the development of individualised treatment plans post-hospital discharge. Eight semi-structured interviews with patients, one focus group, and one individual interview with healthcare providers (n = 6) were analysed using inductive thematic analysis.

Results: Two main themes arose among patients: "Building health literacy through personalized nursing support" and "From knowledge to action: Strengthening health literacy through motivational support" - and two among healthcare professionals; "Health professionals' experience of developing health literacy competency" and "Perceived shifts in understanding, roles, and relationships through health literacy awareness".

Conclusion: The nurse-led health literacy intervention was perceived as valuable by both patients and healthcare professionals. Patients described how home-based support from competent nurses may have contributed to a better understanding of post-discharge care and fostered a sense of preparedness. Professionals reported gaining insights into patient needs, which they felt enabled more tailored communication and care planning. While the findings are based on a small qualitative sample, they suggest that such interventions may support the transition from hospital to home.

Trial registration: The RCT study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT03216603 (registered first 7/7-2017).

慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者和医护人员健康素养干预的经验——一项定性研究
背景:慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)对人们的自我管理提出了挑战,特别是在出院后。很少有研究定性地检查了患者和医护人员在护士主导的健康素养干预后防止再入院的经历。方法:本探索性定性过程评估是在一项随机对照试验中进行的,旨在了解实施健康素养干预后患者和专业人员的观点。干预措施包括由接受过慢性阻塞性肺病培训的护士进行家访,采用动机性访谈技术,并支持制定出院后个性化治疗计划。采用归纳主题分析对8例患者半结构化访谈、1例焦点小组访谈和1例医疗保健提供者个人访谈(n = 6)进行分析。结果:在患者中出现了两个主要主题:“通过个性化护理支持建立健康素养”和“从知识到行动:通过激励支持加强健康素养”-在医疗保健专业人员中出现了两个主题;“卫生专业人员发展卫生知识素养能力的经验”和“通过卫生知识素养意识感知到的理解、角色和关系的转变”。结论:护士主导的健康素养干预被患者和卫生保健专业人员认为是有价值的。患者描述了称职护士的家庭支持如何有助于更好地理解出院后护理,并培养了一种准备感。专业人士报告说,他们对病人的需求有了深入的了解,他们认为这有助于更有针对性的沟通和护理计划。虽然这些发现是基于一个小的定性样本,但它们表明,这些干预措施可能支持从医院到家庭的过渡。试验注册:该RCT研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册(ID: NCT03216603(注册时间为2017年7月7日)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信