Association between population level social risk factors and prevalence of diabetes.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Leonard E Egede, Rebekah J Walker, Sebastian Linde
{"title":"Association between population level social risk factors and prevalence of diabetes.","authors":"Leonard E Egede, Rebekah J Walker, Sebastian Linde","doi":"10.1186/s12913-025-13479-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The goal of this study was to evaluate the relationship between population level social risk and diabetes prevalence using US census tract data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We combined data from the CDC PLACES 2019 database and the Opportunity Insights database. Multiple linear regression was run with standardized estimates to investigate incarceration, poverty, housing, education, employment, job environment, economic mobility, and healthcare access as independent correlates of diabetes prevalence at the census tract, adjusting for US population and state fixed effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final analytic sample consisted of 11,457 census tracts within 157 counties in 38 states. Mean prevalence of diabetes was 11.8%. Healthcare access variables had the strongest association with every standard deviation (SD) increase in proportion with an annual check-up or proportion uninsured, associated with crude prevalence increase of 0.7 or 0.5 SD, respectively. Social risk factors were significant with poverty (every SD increase in income below the poverty line in the full model), housing (every SD increase in average rent for a two-bedroom apartment), and education (every SD increase in proportion of residents with a college degree) each associated with a 0.1 SD increase in crude prevalence of diabetes, and incarceration associated with 0.05 SD increase. Crude prevalence of diabetes varied across states.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The strongest drivers of prevalence of diabetes at the census tract were healthcare access, measured by insurance and having a usual source of care, income, housing, education, and incarceration. Efforts are needed to improve healthcare access while also addressing social risk at the neighborhood level.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"1252"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12482523/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-13479-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The goal of this study was to evaluate the relationship between population level social risk and diabetes prevalence using US census tract data.

Methods: We combined data from the CDC PLACES 2019 database and the Opportunity Insights database. Multiple linear regression was run with standardized estimates to investigate incarceration, poverty, housing, education, employment, job environment, economic mobility, and healthcare access as independent correlates of diabetes prevalence at the census tract, adjusting for US population and state fixed effects.

Results: The final analytic sample consisted of 11,457 census tracts within 157 counties in 38 states. Mean prevalence of diabetes was 11.8%. Healthcare access variables had the strongest association with every standard deviation (SD) increase in proportion with an annual check-up or proportion uninsured, associated with crude prevalence increase of 0.7 or 0.5 SD, respectively. Social risk factors were significant with poverty (every SD increase in income below the poverty line in the full model), housing (every SD increase in average rent for a two-bedroom apartment), and education (every SD increase in proportion of residents with a college degree) each associated with a 0.1 SD increase in crude prevalence of diabetes, and incarceration associated with 0.05 SD increase. Crude prevalence of diabetes varied across states.

Conclusions: The strongest drivers of prevalence of diabetes at the census tract were healthcare access, measured by insurance and having a usual source of care, income, housing, education, and incarceration. Efforts are needed to improve healthcare access while also addressing social risk at the neighborhood level.

人口水平社会危险因素与糖尿病患病率之间的关系。
目的:本研究的目的是利用美国人口普查区数据评估人口水平社会风险与糖尿病患病率之间的关系。方法:我们结合了CDC PLACES 2019数据库和Opportunity Insights数据库的数据。采用标准化估计进行多元线性回归,以调查人口普查区的监禁、贫困、住房、教育、就业、工作环境、经济流动性和医疗保健获取作为糖尿病患病率的独立相关因素,并根据美国人口和州的固定效应进行调整。结果:最终的分析样本包括38个州157个县的11457个人口普查区。糖尿病的平均患病率为11.8%。医疗保健可及性变量与年度体检比例或未参保比例的每个标准差(SD)增加的相关性最强,分别与粗患病率增加0.7或0.5 SD相关。社会风险因素与贫困(在完整模型中,收入在贫困线以下每增加一个标准差)、住房(两居室公寓的平均租金每增加一个标准差)和教育(拥有大学学位的居民比例每增加一个标准差)相关,这些因素与糖尿病粗患病率增加0.1个标准差相关,与监禁增加0.05个标准差相关。糖尿病的粗患病率因州而异。结论:人口普查区糖尿病患病率的最大驱动因素是医疗保健的可及性,通过保险和通常的医疗来源、收入、住房、教育和监禁来衡量。需要努力改善获得医疗保健的机会,同时解决社区一级的社会风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信