The Employment Non-Discrimination Act and Board Gender Diversity

IF 5.7 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Xiaoqi Chen, Jia Liu, Wouter Torsin
{"title":"The Employment Non-Discrimination Act and Board Gender Diversity","authors":"Xiaoqi Chen,&nbsp;Jia Liu,&nbsp;Wouter Torsin","doi":"10.1111/1467-8551.12922","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Many US states have adopted Employment Non−Discrimination Acts (ENDAs) to ensure workplace equity and prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity. This study examines if and how the staggered introduction of ENDAs across US states from 2001 to 2018 influences board gender diversity. Using a stacked difference-in-difference analysis with entropy-balanced matching, we identify a 4.3% increase in female board representation for firms headquartered in states that implement ENDAs, relative to the median level of board gender diversity. We employ both internal and external instrumental variable approaches to validate our primary findings. Notably, the effect is more pronounced in firms with female leadership and is reversed in firms led by Republican-leaning executives. Moreover, post-ENDA diversity increases are stronger in firms headquartered in Democrat-voting states and those where pre-existing diversity concerns are higher. Further analysis indicates that female board members are more likely to be independent directors and serve on compensation or audit committees. Drawing on isomorphism and spillover theories, our study provides original evidence that ENDAs embed prosocial norms within firms, generating a spillover effect, whereby the inclusivity and diversity fostered at state level in turn enhance board gender diversity at firm level.</p>","PeriodicalId":48342,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Management","volume":"36 4","pages":"1578-1597"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-8551.12922","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8551.12922","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many US states have adopted Employment Non−Discrimination Acts (ENDAs) to ensure workplace equity and prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity. This study examines if and how the staggered introduction of ENDAs across US states from 2001 to 2018 influences board gender diversity. Using a stacked difference-in-difference analysis with entropy-balanced matching, we identify a 4.3% increase in female board representation for firms headquartered in states that implement ENDAs, relative to the median level of board gender diversity. We employ both internal and external instrumental variable approaches to validate our primary findings. Notably, the effect is more pronounced in firms with female leadership and is reversed in firms led by Republican-leaning executives. Moreover, post-ENDA diversity increases are stronger in firms headquartered in Democrat-voting states and those where pre-existing diversity concerns are higher. Further analysis indicates that female board members are more likely to be independent directors and serve on compensation or audit committees. Drawing on isomorphism and spillover theories, our study provides original evidence that ENDAs embed prosocial norms within firms, generating a spillover effect, whereby the inclusivity and diversity fostered at state level in turn enhance board gender diversity at firm level.

Abstract Image

《就业非歧视法案》和董事会性别多元化
美国许多州都通过了《就业反歧视法》(Employment Non - Discrimination act,简称ENDAs),以确保工作场所公平,并禁止基于性取向或性别认同的歧视。本研究考察了2001年至2018年美国各州错开的ENDAs引入是否以及如何影响董事会的性别多样性。利用熵平衡匹配的叠加差中差分析,我们发现,相对于董事会性别多样性的中位数水平,总部位于实施ENDAs的州的公司的女性董事会比例增加了4.3%。我们采用内部和外部工具变量方法来验证我们的主要发现。值得注意的是,这种影响在女性领导的公司更为明显,而在倾向共和党的高管领导的公司则相反。此外,在《enda》实施后,总部位于民主党投票州的公司和那些先前存在多样性问题的公司的多样性增长更为强劲。进一步分析表明,女性董事会成员更有可能成为独立董事,并在薪酬或审计委员会任职。利用同构理论和溢出理论,我们的研究提供了原始证据,证明ENDAs在公司内部嵌入了亲社会规范,产生了溢出效应,从而在国家层面培育的包容性和多样性反过来增强了公司层面的董事会性别多样性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Management provides a valuable outlet for research and scholarship on management-orientated themes and topics. It publishes articles of a multi-disciplinary and interdisciplinary nature as well as empirical research from within traditional disciplines and managerial functions. With contributions from around the globe, the journal includes articles across the full range of business and management disciplines. A subscription to British Journal of Management includes International Journal of Management Reviews, also published on behalf of the British Academy of Management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信