State ownership and cost-effectiveness of environmental policies: Firm-level evidence

IF 1.3 4区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Maoyong Fan, Shunqi Ge, Haoyang Li, Jinhua Zhao
{"title":"State ownership and cost-effectiveness of environmental policies: Firm-level evidence","authors":"Maoyong Fan,&nbsp;Shunqi Ge,&nbsp;Haoyang Li,&nbsp;Jinhua Zhao","doi":"10.1111/ecin.70012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We employ Chinese firm-level data to examine the interconnections among firm ownership, environmental regulation, and non-environmental economic policies. We find that there are substantial differences between state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and privately-owned enterprises (POEs) in their responses to government anti-pollution mandates. SOEs reduced emissions more than POEs, with the former relying mainly on abatement investment and the latter on reducing outputs. An average POE's marginal abatement cost is more than nine times that of an average SOE, suggesting significant inefficiencies in policy implementation. Policies liberalizing financial markets could affect POEs' abatement costs and improve the cost-effectiveness of environmental policies.</p>","PeriodicalId":51380,"journal":{"name":"Economic Inquiry","volume":"63 4","pages":"1252-1278"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecin.70012","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We employ Chinese firm-level data to examine the interconnections among firm ownership, environmental regulation, and non-environmental economic policies. We find that there are substantial differences between state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and privately-owned enterprises (POEs) in their responses to government anti-pollution mandates. SOEs reduced emissions more than POEs, with the former relying mainly on abatement investment and the latter on reducing outputs. An average POE's marginal abatement cost is more than nine times that of an average SOE, suggesting significant inefficiencies in policy implementation. Policies liberalizing financial markets could affect POEs' abatement costs and improve the cost-effectiveness of environmental policies.

Abstract Image

国家所有权和环境政策的成本效益:公司层面的证据
我们使用中国企业层面的数据来检验企业所有权、环境监管和非环境经济政策之间的相互关系。我们发现,国有企业(soe)和私营企业(poe)在应对政府反污染指令方面存在实质性差异。国有企业比民营企业减排更多,前者主要依靠减排投资,后者主要依靠减产。POE的平均边际减排成本是SOE的平均边际减排成本的9倍以上,这表明政策实施的效率明显低下。开放金融市场的政策可能影响到私营企业的减排成本,并提高环境政策的成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Economic Inquiry
Economic Inquiry ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: Published since 1962, (formerly Western Economic Journal), EI is widely regarded as one of the top scholarly journals in its field. Besides containing research on all economics topic areas, a principal objective is to make each article understandable to economists who are not necessarily specialists in the article topic area. Nine Nobel laureates are among EI long list of prestigious authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信