Raising a claim for (animal) justice: The end(s) of socio-legal and critical legal studies

IF 1.9 3区社会学 Q1 LAW

Journal of Law and Society Pub Date : 2025-07-07 DOI:10.1111/jols.70000

STEWART MOTHA

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This short essay follows an invitation from this journal to reflect on the relation between socio-legal and critical legal studies over the past 50 years, a period during which the Journal of Law and Society has been one of the primary conduits for scholarship of both persuasions. After interrogating their commonalities and differences, hopes and anxieties, I go on to suggest that legal studies should be oriented by the objective of opening claims for justice, and I argue that this needs to be extended to animal justice.

Abstract Image

查看原文本刊更多论文

提出（动物）正义的要求：社会法律和批判法律研究的终结

这篇短文是应《法律与社会》杂志的邀请，反思过去50年来社会法学和批判法学研究之间的关系，在此期间，《法律与社会》杂志一直是这两种观点的学术研究的主要渠道之一。在探究了它们的共性与差异、希望与焦虑之后，我继续建议，法律研究应该以公开正义诉求的目标为导向，我认为这需要扩展到动物正义。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Law and Society Multiple-

CiteScore

2.00

自引率

15.40%

发文量

期刊介绍： Established as the leading British periodical for Socio-Legal Studies The Journal of Law and Society offers an interdisciplinary approach. It is committed to achieving a broad international appeal, attracting contributions and addressing issues from a range of legal cultures, as well as theoretical concerns of cross- cultural interest. It produces an annual special issue, which is also published in book form. It has a widely respected Book Review section and is cited all over the world. Challenging, authoritative and topical, the journal appeals to legal researchers and practitioners as well as sociologists, criminologists and other social scientists.