Single-Side Iatrogenic Pedicle Injury May Trigger an Increased Risk of Contralateral Screw Loosening: An In Silico Study

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
JOR Spine Pub Date : 2025-10-01 DOI:10.1002/jsp2.70124
Jiexiang Yang, Junjie Chen, Guoyou Wang, Lijunpeng Jia, Yingguang Zhou, Jingchi Li
{"title":"Single-Side Iatrogenic Pedicle Injury May Trigger an Increased Risk of Contralateral Screw Loosening: An In Silico Study","authors":"Jiexiang Yang,&nbsp;Junjie Chen,&nbsp;Guoyou Wang,&nbsp;Lijunpeng Jia,&nbsp;Yingguang Zhou,&nbsp;Jingchi Li","doi":"10.1002/jsp2.70124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Screw loosening is a frequently reported complication following pedicle screw fixation, resulting in various adverse outcomes. The primary trigger for screw loosening is biomechanical deterioration. Iatrogenic injury to the pedicle is a commonly observed scenario. This alteration can lead to an increased risk of pedicle screw loosening. Bilateral pedicle screws distribute load during the patient's daily activities and can be regarded as an integrated structure from a biomechanical perspective. Consequently, biomechanical interactions are prevalent between the two sides of the pedicle screws. This study aimed to determine whether unilateral pedicle injury influences contralateral screw loosening by deteriorating the local biomechanical environment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The numerical model of the L5 vertebral body, developed in our previous studies, was employed in this investigation. Bilateral pedicle screws were inserted following the standard trajectory. Simulations of both half and complete ventral and dorsal side pedicle injuries were performed on the right-side pedicle. Stress and strain values of the screw trajectory, along with screw displacement values on the contralateral side, were recorded to assess the potential risk of screw loosening.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Compared to the model without pedicle injury, models with pedicle injuries exhibited higher interfacial stress and strain, as well as greater screw displacement. This effect was particularly pronounced when the pedicle on the side of torque restriction (e.g., caudal side pedicle injury under the flexion loading condition) was considered. Furthermore, unilateral iatrogenic injury to the pedicle can trigger multi-degree-of-freedom coupled motion under a single-direction torque.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Single-side iatrogenic pedicle injury can lead to multi-degree-of-freedom coupled motion of the screw-fixed vertebral body, and biomechanical deterioration of the contralateral screw trajectory, thereby increasing the risk of contralateral pedicle screw loosening.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14876,"journal":{"name":"JOR Spine","volume":"8 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jsp2.70124","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOR Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jsp2.70124","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Screw loosening is a frequently reported complication following pedicle screw fixation, resulting in various adverse outcomes. The primary trigger for screw loosening is biomechanical deterioration. Iatrogenic injury to the pedicle is a commonly observed scenario. This alteration can lead to an increased risk of pedicle screw loosening. Bilateral pedicle screws distribute load during the patient's daily activities and can be regarded as an integrated structure from a biomechanical perspective. Consequently, biomechanical interactions are prevalent between the two sides of the pedicle screws. This study aimed to determine whether unilateral pedicle injury influences contralateral screw loosening by deteriorating the local biomechanical environment.

Methods

The numerical model of the L5 vertebral body, developed in our previous studies, was employed in this investigation. Bilateral pedicle screws were inserted following the standard trajectory. Simulations of both half and complete ventral and dorsal side pedicle injuries were performed on the right-side pedicle. Stress and strain values of the screw trajectory, along with screw displacement values on the contralateral side, were recorded to assess the potential risk of screw loosening.

Results

Compared to the model without pedicle injury, models with pedicle injuries exhibited higher interfacial stress and strain, as well as greater screw displacement. This effect was particularly pronounced when the pedicle on the side of torque restriction (e.g., caudal side pedicle injury under the flexion loading condition) was considered. Furthermore, unilateral iatrogenic injury to the pedicle can trigger multi-degree-of-freedom coupled motion under a single-direction torque.

Conclusions

Single-side iatrogenic pedicle injury can lead to multi-degree-of-freedom coupled motion of the screw-fixed vertebral body, and biomechanical deterioration of the contralateral screw trajectory, thereby increasing the risk of contralateral pedicle screw loosening.

Abstract Image

单侧医源性椎弓根损伤可能会增加对侧螺钉松动的风险:一项计算机研究
背景螺钉松动是椎弓根螺钉固定后常见的并发症,可导致各种不良后果。螺钉松动的主要诱因是生物力学恶化。医源性椎弓根损伤是一种常见的情况。这种改变会增加椎弓根螺钉松动的风险。双侧椎弓根螺钉在患者日常活动中分配负荷,从生物力学角度来看可视为一个整体结构。因此,椎弓根螺钉两侧之间普遍存在生物力学相互作用。本研究旨在确定单侧椎弓根损伤是否通过恶化局部生物力学环境影响对侧螺钉松动。方法采用我们以前研究中开发的L5椎体的数值模型进行研究。按照标准轨迹置入双侧椎弓根螺钉。在右侧椎弓根上模拟了一半和完全的腹侧和背侧椎弓根损伤。记录螺钉轨迹的应力和应变值以及对侧螺钉位移值,以评估螺钉松动的潜在风险。结果与无椎弓根损伤模型相比,椎弓根损伤模型表现出更高的界面应力和应变,以及更大的螺钉位移。当考虑到扭矩受限一侧的椎弓根时(例如,屈曲载荷条件下的尾侧椎弓根损伤),这种影响尤为明显。此外,单侧医源性椎弓根损伤可在单向扭矩下引发多自由度耦合运动。结论单侧医源性椎弓根损伤可导致螺钉固定椎体多自由度耦合运动,对侧螺钉轨迹生物力学恶化,从而增加对侧椎弓根螺钉松动的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JOR Spine
JOR Spine ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
18.90%
发文量
42
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信