Mobile Health (mHealth) for Chronic Low Back Pain Assessment: Design, Development, and Usability Evaluation

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
JOR Spine Pub Date : 2025-10-01 DOI:10.1002/jsp2.70118
Zakiy F. Alfikri, Marit E. Johnson, Brad E. Dicianno, Carol M. Greco, Bambang Parmanto, Sara R. Piva, Rachel E. Roos, Andi Saptono, Gwendolyn A. Sowa, Leming Zhou, Kevin M. Bell
{"title":"Mobile Health (mHealth) for Chronic Low Back Pain Assessment: Design, Development, and Usability Evaluation","authors":"Zakiy F. Alfikri,&nbsp;Marit E. Johnson,&nbsp;Brad E. Dicianno,&nbsp;Carol M. Greco,&nbsp;Bambang Parmanto,&nbsp;Sara R. Piva,&nbsp;Rachel E. Roos,&nbsp;Andi Saptono,&nbsp;Gwendolyn A. Sowa,&nbsp;Leming Zhou,&nbsp;Kevin M. Bell","doi":"10.1002/jsp2.70118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Chronic low back pain (cLBP) requires precise phenotyping for tailored treatments. This study introduces a mobile health (mHealth) system for cLBP assessment, aiming to collect extensive biomechanical and behavioral data from in-clinic and seven-day at-home assessments from 1000 individuals with cLBP to accommodate accurate phenotyping.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Using a user-centered design approach, an integrated mHealth system was developed, comprising two mobile applications: a clinician-facing in-clinic app and a participant-facing at-home app. The in-clinic app aids physical therapists in conducting in-clinic assessments, while the at-home app allows cLBP patients to manage and submit responses to ecological momentary assessments (EMA). Usability evaluations were conducted using the mHealth App Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ) and qualitative open-ended questions asking about ease of use, learnability, overall impression and satisfaction, and reflective questions. Scores from MAUQ were summarized using median and interquartile range (IQR). The usability results were used to iteratively refine the system's design and functionality.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Three physical therapists and 337 out of 522 cLBP patients participated in the usability evaluations. The evaluations demonstrated positive feedback for both apps. For the in-clinic app, the first iteration median MAUQ score was 6 (IQR 1) and the second iteration median MAUQ score was also 6 (IQR 2). For the at-home app, the median MAUQ scores were consistently high across five iterations (median score of 7 (IQR 1) for all iterations). These scores indicated good usability, meaning they were easy to use, efficient, and satisfying. Iterative modifications based on the feedback focused on enhancing navigation consistency, responsiveness, and user interface, resulting in overall improved usability.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The in-clinic app was successfully used by physical therapists for the assessments of 1000 cLBP patients, receiving positive feedback. Similarly, 989 cLBP patients used the at-home app to complete and submit their EMA, finding it easier to comply with the assessment.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14876,"journal":{"name":"JOR Spine","volume":"8 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jsp2.70118","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOR Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jsp2.70118","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Chronic low back pain (cLBP) requires precise phenotyping for tailored treatments. This study introduces a mobile health (mHealth) system for cLBP assessment, aiming to collect extensive biomechanical and behavioral data from in-clinic and seven-day at-home assessments from 1000 individuals with cLBP to accommodate accurate phenotyping.

Methods

Using a user-centered design approach, an integrated mHealth system was developed, comprising two mobile applications: a clinician-facing in-clinic app and a participant-facing at-home app. The in-clinic app aids physical therapists in conducting in-clinic assessments, while the at-home app allows cLBP patients to manage and submit responses to ecological momentary assessments (EMA). Usability evaluations were conducted using the mHealth App Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ) and qualitative open-ended questions asking about ease of use, learnability, overall impression and satisfaction, and reflective questions. Scores from MAUQ were summarized using median and interquartile range (IQR). The usability results were used to iteratively refine the system's design and functionality.

Results

Three physical therapists and 337 out of 522 cLBP patients participated in the usability evaluations. The evaluations demonstrated positive feedback for both apps. For the in-clinic app, the first iteration median MAUQ score was 6 (IQR 1) and the second iteration median MAUQ score was also 6 (IQR 2). For the at-home app, the median MAUQ scores were consistently high across five iterations (median score of 7 (IQR 1) for all iterations). These scores indicated good usability, meaning they were easy to use, efficient, and satisfying. Iterative modifications based on the feedback focused on enhancing navigation consistency, responsiveness, and user interface, resulting in overall improved usability.

Conclusion

The in-clinic app was successfully used by physical therapists for the assessments of 1000 cLBP patients, receiving positive feedback. Similarly, 989 cLBP patients used the at-home app to complete and submit their EMA, finding it easier to comply with the assessment.

Abstract Image

慢性腰痛评估的移动健康(mHealth):设计、开发和可用性评估
背景慢性腰痛(cLBP)需要精确的表型来定制治疗。本研究引入了一种用于cLBP评估的移动健康(mHealth)系统,旨在从1000名cLBP患者的临床和7天家庭评估中收集广泛的生物力学和行为数据,以适应准确的表型。方法采用以用户为中心的设计方法,开发了一个集成的移动健康系统,包括两个移动应用程序:面向临床医生的临床应用程序和面向参与者的家庭应用程序。临床应用程序帮助物理治疗师进行临床评估,而家庭应用程序允许cLBP患者管理并提交对生态瞬时评估(EMA)的响应。可用性评估使用移动健康应用程序可用性问卷(MAUQ)和关于易用性、易学性、总体印象和满意度的定性开放式问题以及反思性问题进行。MAUQ评分采用中位数和四分位差(IQR)进行汇总。可用性结果用于迭代地改进系统的设计和功能。结果3名物理治疗师和522名cLBP患者中的337名参与了可用性评估。评估结果显示,这两款应用都获得了积极的反馈。对于临床应用程序,第一次迭代中位数MAUQ评分为6 (IQR 1),第二次迭代中位数MAUQ评分为6 (IQR 2)。对于家庭应用程序,在五个迭代中,MAUQ的中位数得分一直很高(所有迭代的中位数得分为7 (IQR 1))。这些分数表明了良好的可用性,这意味着它们易于使用,高效且令人满意。基于反馈的迭代修改侧重于增强导航一致性、响应性和用户界面,从而全面改进可用性。结论物理治疗师成功使用该app对1000例cLBP患者进行了临床评估,并获得了积极的反馈。同样,989名cLBP患者使用家庭应用程序完成并提交了他们的EMA,发现更容易遵守评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JOR Spine
JOR Spine ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
18.90%
发文量
42
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信