Investigating Healthcare Educators' Interprofessional Socialisation Following an Interprofessional Simulation Facilitator Training Programme: A Mixed Methods Study.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Sara Dolan,Lorelli Nowell,Nancy Moules,Alyshah Kaba,Meredith Brockway
{"title":"Investigating Healthcare Educators' Interprofessional Socialisation Following an Interprofessional Simulation Facilitator Training Programme: A Mixed Methods Study.","authors":"Sara Dolan,Lorelli Nowell,Nancy Moules,Alyshah Kaba,Meredith Brockway","doi":"10.1111/jan.70267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIM\r\nInterprofessional socialisation can contribute to collaborative patient care. Although there is research regarding interprofessional socialisation of healthcare students and frontline staff, there is limited literature regarding healthcare educators in practice settings. Our aim was to examine interprofessional socialisation of healthcare educators in the practice setting following an interprofessional simulation facilitator training programme.\r\n\r\nDESIGN\r\nExplanatory sequential mixed methods study.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nQuantitative provincial simulation programme evaluation data from 2022 and 2023 (n = 87) were analysed and used to inform qualitative interviews (n = 17). Qualitative and quantitative data were integrated following independent analysis.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThere was a statistically significant increase in attitudes toward interprofessional socialisation following the simulation facilitator training programme. Qualitative findings revealed themes regarding interprofessional socialisation: (a) benefits gained through interprofessional socialisation, (b) interprofessional, uniprofessional or both, (c) facilitators to interprofessional socialisation, (d) barriers to interprofessional socialisation and (e) opportunities to strengthen interprofessional socialisation.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nDespite positive views of interprofessional socialisation, socialisation behaviours may not be consistent in a variety of contexts. Interprofessional education may increase interprofessional socialisation among educators.\r\n\r\nIMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION\r\nIt is important to provide interprofessional socialisation opportunities for educators to promote more interprofessional education initiatives.\r\n\r\nIMPACT\r\nThe findings of this study provided insights into how to foster interprofessional socialisation in existing structures and how new pathways might be built to connect educators.\r\n\r\nREPORTING METHOD\r\nThis study is reported in congruence with the Journal Article Reporting Standards-Mixed Methods, Quantitative, and Qualitative Standards provided on the Equator Network.\r\n\r\nPUBLIC CONTRIBUTION\r\nMembers of the provincial simulation team were consulted regarding study design and data collection to optimise participation.","PeriodicalId":54897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.70267","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AIM Interprofessional socialisation can contribute to collaborative patient care. Although there is research regarding interprofessional socialisation of healthcare students and frontline staff, there is limited literature regarding healthcare educators in practice settings. Our aim was to examine interprofessional socialisation of healthcare educators in the practice setting following an interprofessional simulation facilitator training programme. DESIGN Explanatory sequential mixed methods study. METHODS Quantitative provincial simulation programme evaluation data from 2022 and 2023 (n = 87) were analysed and used to inform qualitative interviews (n = 17). Qualitative and quantitative data were integrated following independent analysis. RESULTS There was a statistically significant increase in attitudes toward interprofessional socialisation following the simulation facilitator training programme. Qualitative findings revealed themes regarding interprofessional socialisation: (a) benefits gained through interprofessional socialisation, (b) interprofessional, uniprofessional or both, (c) facilitators to interprofessional socialisation, (d) barriers to interprofessional socialisation and (e) opportunities to strengthen interprofessional socialisation. CONCLUSION Despite positive views of interprofessional socialisation, socialisation behaviours may not be consistent in a variety of contexts. Interprofessional education may increase interprofessional socialisation among educators. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION It is important to provide interprofessional socialisation opportunities for educators to promote more interprofessional education initiatives. IMPACT The findings of this study provided insights into how to foster interprofessional socialisation in existing structures and how new pathways might be built to connect educators. REPORTING METHOD This study is reported in congruence with the Journal Article Reporting Standards-Mixed Methods, Quantitative, and Qualitative Standards provided on the Equator Network. PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION Members of the provincial simulation team were consulted regarding study design and data collection to optimise participation.
调查医疗保健教育工作者在跨专业模拟促进者培训计划后的跨专业社交:一项混合方法研究。
跨专业社交有助于协作式患者护理。虽然有关于医疗保健学生和一线工作人员的跨专业社会化的研究,但关于实践环境中的医疗保健教育工作者的文献有限。我们的目的是在跨专业模拟促进者培训计划之后,在实践环境中检查医疗保健教育工作者的跨专业社会化。设计:解释性顺序混合方法研究。方法分析2022年和2023年定量省级模拟项目评估数据(n = 87),并将其用于定性访谈(n = 17)。定性和定量资料经独立分析后整合。结果在模拟引导员培训项目后,对跨专业社交的态度有统计学上的显著提高。定性研究结果揭示了有关跨专业社会化的主题:(a)通过跨专业社会化获得的好处,(b)跨专业、非专业或两者兼而有之,(c)跨专业社会化的促进因素,(d)跨专业社会化的障碍,(e)加强跨专业社会化的机会。结论:尽管对跨职业社会化持积极态度,但社会化行为在各种情境下可能并不一致。跨专业教育可以增加教育者之间的跨专业社会化。为教育工作者提供跨专业的社交机会,以促进更多的跨专业教育活动,这一点很重要。影响本研究的发现为如何在现有结构中促进跨专业社交以及如何建立联系教育者的新途径提供了见解。报告方法本研究的报告与期刊文章报告标准一致-赤道网络提供的混合方法,定量和定性标准。在研究设计和数据收集方面咨询了省级模拟小组的成员,以优化参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.90%
发文量
369
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Advanced Nursing (JAN) contributes to the advancement of evidence-based nursing, midwifery and healthcare by disseminating high quality research and scholarship of contemporary relevance and with potential to advance knowledge for practice, education, management or policy. All JAN papers are required to have a sound scientific, evidential, theoretical or philosophical base and to be critical, questioning and scholarly in approach. As an international journal, JAN promotes diversity of research and scholarship in terms of culture, paradigm and healthcare context. For JAN’s worldwide readership, authors are expected to make clear the wider international relevance of their work and to demonstrate sensitivity to cultural considerations and differences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信