Community-Based Initiatives to Improve Maternal and Newborn Health in High-Income Settings: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review.

IF 2.3
Elise Robinson, Aradhna Kaushal, Joanna Drazdzewska
{"title":"Community-Based Initiatives to Improve Maternal and Newborn Health in High-Income Settings: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review.","authors":"Elise Robinson, Aradhna Kaushal, Joanna Drazdzewska","doi":"10.1111/jmwh.70023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although community-based interventions, including Participatory Learning and Action (PLA) groups, have demonstrated significant success in improving maternal and newborn health outcomes and promoting equity in low to middle-income countries, the evidence in high-income settings remains limited. This systematic review, carried out in collaboration with Women and Children First (a UK-based charity focusing on improving the lives of women and children globally), explores community-based initiatives that are currently used in high-income countries (HICs) to enhance maternal and newborn health, as well as the effectiveness of these initiatives in improving maternal and newborn health outcomes. Additionally, the review aims to examine the relationship between community-based initiatives and PLA methodology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a mixed-method systematic review with a narrative synthesis of results. MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and MIDIRS databases were searched for community-based initiatives for any maternal and neonatal health outcome between 2000 and 2023. Both quantitative and qualitative studies were included and assessed for methodological quality using the Mixed-Methods Appraisal Tool. A convergent results-based synthesis approach was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of18 studies were included for review. Three main types of community-based interventions were identified: peer support, social support, and health education. Most interventions had beneficial effects on their maternal and neonatal health outcomes of interest. Qualitative analysis revealed 4 main aspects of peer support-connectedness, emotional validation, self-efficacy, and information sharing-which helps to explain the positive effects of peer support, particularly for breastfeeding and maternal mental health. The community-based initiatives linked to PLA methodology in some ways but were lacking in promoting community mobilization since the majority were aimed at the individual or group level, as opposed to engaging whole communities.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Community-based initiatives can be effective in HICs for improving aspects of maternal and neonatal health, particularly maternal mental health and breastfeeding. There is very limited research on more participatory community-based initiatives, such as PLA, in HICs that promote community-wide engagement and mobilization. Further research is needed in this area.</p>","PeriodicalId":94094,"journal":{"name":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.70023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Although community-based interventions, including Participatory Learning and Action (PLA) groups, have demonstrated significant success in improving maternal and newborn health outcomes and promoting equity in low to middle-income countries, the evidence in high-income settings remains limited. This systematic review, carried out in collaboration with Women and Children First (a UK-based charity focusing on improving the lives of women and children globally), explores community-based initiatives that are currently used in high-income countries (HICs) to enhance maternal and newborn health, as well as the effectiveness of these initiatives in improving maternal and newborn health outcomes. Additionally, the review aims to examine the relationship between community-based initiatives and PLA methodology.

Methods: This is a mixed-method systematic review with a narrative synthesis of results. MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and MIDIRS databases were searched for community-based initiatives for any maternal and neonatal health outcome between 2000 and 2023. Both quantitative and qualitative studies were included and assessed for methodological quality using the Mixed-Methods Appraisal Tool. A convergent results-based synthesis approach was used.

Results: A total of18 studies were included for review. Three main types of community-based interventions were identified: peer support, social support, and health education. Most interventions had beneficial effects on their maternal and neonatal health outcomes of interest. Qualitative analysis revealed 4 main aspects of peer support-connectedness, emotional validation, self-efficacy, and information sharing-which helps to explain the positive effects of peer support, particularly for breastfeeding and maternal mental health. The community-based initiatives linked to PLA methodology in some ways but were lacking in promoting community mobilization since the majority were aimed at the individual or group level, as opposed to engaging whole communities.

Discussion: Community-based initiatives can be effective in HICs for improving aspects of maternal and neonatal health, particularly maternal mental health and breastfeeding. There is very limited research on more participatory community-based initiatives, such as PLA, in HICs that promote community-wide engagement and mobilization. Further research is needed in this area.

以社区为基础的改善高收入环境中孕产妇和新生儿健康的举措:一项混合方法的系统评价。
导论:虽然以社区为基础的干预措施,包括参与式学习和行动(PLA)小组,在改善孕产妇和新生儿健康结果和促进公平方面取得了重大成功,但在高收入环境中证据仍然有限。这项系统审查是与妇女和儿童优先组织(一家总部设在英国的慈善机构,致力于改善全球妇女和儿童的生活)合作进行的,探讨了目前在高收入国家为加强孕产妇和新生儿健康而采用的基于社区的举措,以及这些举措在改善孕产妇和新生儿健康结果方面的有效性。此外,本综述旨在研究社区倡议与解放军方法之间的关系。方法:这是一个混合方法的系统综述,结果的叙述综合。在MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL和MIDIRS数据库中搜索2000年至2023年期间任何孕产妇和新生儿健康结果的社区倡议。定量和定性研究均纳入研究,并使用混合方法评估工具评估方法学质量。采用了基于结果的收敛综合方法。结果:共纳入18项研究。确定了三种主要的社区干预措施:同伴支持、社会支持和健康教育。大多数干预措施对他们感兴趣的孕产妇和新生儿健康结果有有益的影响。定性分析揭示了同伴支持的4个主要方面——联系、情感确认、自我效能和信息分享——这有助于解释同伴支持的积极影响,特别是对母乳喂养和母亲心理健康的积极影响。以社区为基础的倡议在某些方面与人民解放军的方法有关,但缺乏促进社区动员,因为大多数是针对个人或团体层面的,而不是让整个社区参与。讨论:基于社区的举措可以有效地改善高卫生保健国家的孕产妇和新生儿健康,特别是孕产妇心理健康和母乳喂养。关于在高收入国家中促进全社区参与和动员的更具参与性的社区倡议(如人民解放军)的研究非常有限。这方面需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信