Measuring the strength of primary care: development of a new system of Structural Indicators for the Strength of Primary Care - SiSPC.

IF 1.7
Wienke G W Boerma, Peter Groenewegen, Rob Timans, Sarah Burgmann, Rosa Suñol, Pili Illarramendi Charovsky, Jose M Valderas
{"title":"Measuring the strength of primary care: development of a new system of Structural Indicators for the Strength of Primary Care - SiSPC.","authors":"Wienke G W Boerma, Peter Groenewegen, Rob Timans, Sarah Burgmann, Rosa Suñol, Pili Illarramendi Charovsky, Jose M Valderas","doi":"10.1017/S1463423625100509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to develop an up-to-date system of Structural Indicators for the Strength of Primary Care (SiSPC) to enable comparisons of primary care systems across countries.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Indicators are needed for international research into the development of primary care and to support countries in monitoring improvements in access, responsiveness and efficiency of their primary care services. International comparisons with use of identical indicators for the strength of primary care offer policymakers opportunities to learn lessons from abroad.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our point of departure was the Primary Health Care Activity Monitor Europe (PHAMEU), that effectively measured the strength of primary care at the beginning of this century. We went through the following steps: (1) Reduction, refining and tuning of the PHAMEU indicator system (2) comparison with the European Primary Health Care, Impact, Performance and Capacity Tool (PHC-IMPACT) (3) addition of topics from other frameworks (4) identification of topical issues from the literature. The resulting draft indicator system was discussed at meetings and received feedback from experts from 25 countries.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>SiSPC consists of three care-related domains: Structure of Primary Care, Systemic Aspects of Facility Management and Systemic Aspects of Care Delivery. SiSPC also contains a domain on the Context of Primary Care. Care processes that vary between care providers, were not included as a domain at the system level.</p>","PeriodicalId":74493,"journal":{"name":"Primary health care research & development","volume":"26 ","pages":"e85"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary health care research & development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423625100509","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to develop an up-to-date system of Structural Indicators for the Strength of Primary Care (SiSPC) to enable comparisons of primary care systems across countries.

Background: Indicators are needed for international research into the development of primary care and to support countries in monitoring improvements in access, responsiveness and efficiency of their primary care services. International comparisons with use of identical indicators for the strength of primary care offer policymakers opportunities to learn lessons from abroad.

Methods: Our point of departure was the Primary Health Care Activity Monitor Europe (PHAMEU), that effectively measured the strength of primary care at the beginning of this century. We went through the following steps: (1) Reduction, refining and tuning of the PHAMEU indicator system (2) comparison with the European Primary Health Care, Impact, Performance and Capacity Tool (PHC-IMPACT) (3) addition of topics from other frameworks (4) identification of topical issues from the literature. The resulting draft indicator system was discussed at meetings and received feedback from experts from 25 countries.

Findings: SiSPC consists of three care-related domains: Structure of Primary Care, Systemic Aspects of Facility Management and Systemic Aspects of Care Delivery. SiSPC also contains a domain on the Context of Primary Care. Care processes that vary between care providers, were not included as a domain at the system level.

测量初级保健的力量:发展一个新的结构指标体系的力量- SiSPC。
目的:本研究的目的是开发一个最新的初级保健强度结构指标系统(SiSPC),以便对各国的初级保健系统进行比较。背景:需要指标来进行初级保健发展方面的国际研究,并支持各国监测其初级保健服务的可及性、反应性和效率方面的改善情况。使用相同指标对初级保健的实力进行国际比较,为政策制定者提供了从国外吸取教训的机会。方法:我们的出发点是欧洲初级卫生保健活动监测(PHAMEU),它有效地测量了本世纪初初级卫生保健的强度。我们经历了以下步骤:(1)减少、完善和调整PHAMEU指标体系;(2)与欧洲初级卫生保健、影响、绩效和能力工具(PHC-IMPACT)进行比较;(3)从其他框架中添加主题;(4)从文献中确定主题问题。会议讨论了由此产生的指标体系草案,并收到了来自25个国家的专家的反馈。研究结果:SiSPC包括三个与护理相关的领域:初级保健结构、设施管理的系统方面和护理提供的系统方面。SiSPC还包含一个关于初级保健上下文的域。不同护理提供者之间的护理过程不包括在系统级别的域中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信