Importance, facilitators and barriers for finnish general practitioner involvement in clinical practice guideline panels: a survey.

IF 2.6 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Ilona Mikkola, Jorma Komulainen, Maria Hagnäs, Raija Sipilä
{"title":"Importance, facilitators and barriers for finnish general practitioner involvement in clinical practice guideline panels: a survey.","authors":"Ilona Mikkola, Jorma Komulainen, Maria Hagnäs, Raija Sipilä","doi":"10.1186/s12875-025-03017-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Difficulties in recruiting general practitioners (GPs) to clinical practice guideline panels (CPGPs) have been noted. However, little is known about the specific nature of these challenges. Our objective was to investigate (1) GPs' insights on the importance of their involvement in clinical practice guideline development and (2) the most essential facilitators and barriers related to GPs' involvement in CPGPs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For this survey, we invited GPs who had been CPGP members in Current Care Guidelines of Finnish Medical Society Duodecim during the years 2017-2022 (n = 78) to an e-mail survey, which collected information on respondents' backgrounds and aspects of their GP involvement prior to, during, and after the clinical practice guideline process. GPs were identified from the registry of Duodecim. In this article, we report the qualitative analysis of the data. We analysed open-ended questions both deductively (using WONCA core competencies) and inductively regarding the question of important reasons for GP involvement. Facilitators and barriers to involvement were analysed inductively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 39 GPs (50.0%) responded. The three most important elements reflecting importance of GPs' involvement in CPGPs were GPs' understanding of primary care management, GPs' role as a major target group of clinical practice guidelines, and GP-specific problem-solving skills. The most important facilitators were information and education related to guideline work, a supportive employer attitude, and financial support. Conversely, lack of time and knowledge regarding the critical appraisal of research evidence were the most important barriers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GPs' involvement in CPGPs should be supported by strengthening the promotive factors and reducing barriers to participation.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":"26 1","pages":"300"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12482205/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-03017-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Difficulties in recruiting general practitioners (GPs) to clinical practice guideline panels (CPGPs) have been noted. However, little is known about the specific nature of these challenges. Our objective was to investigate (1) GPs' insights on the importance of their involvement in clinical practice guideline development and (2) the most essential facilitators and barriers related to GPs' involvement in CPGPs.

Methods: For this survey, we invited GPs who had been CPGP members in Current Care Guidelines of Finnish Medical Society Duodecim during the years 2017-2022 (n = 78) to an e-mail survey, which collected information on respondents' backgrounds and aspects of their GP involvement prior to, during, and after the clinical practice guideline process. GPs were identified from the registry of Duodecim. In this article, we report the qualitative analysis of the data. We analysed open-ended questions both deductively (using WONCA core competencies) and inductively regarding the question of important reasons for GP involvement. Facilitators and barriers to involvement were analysed inductively.

Results: Overall, 39 GPs (50.0%) responded. The three most important elements reflecting importance of GPs' involvement in CPGPs were GPs' understanding of primary care management, GPs' role as a major target group of clinical practice guidelines, and GP-specific problem-solving skills. The most important facilitators were information and education related to guideline work, a supportive employer attitude, and financial support. Conversely, lack of time and knowledge regarding the critical appraisal of research evidence were the most important barriers.

Conclusion: GPs' involvement in CPGPs should be supported by strengthening the promotive factors and reducing barriers to participation.

芬兰全科医生参与临床实践指南小组的重要性、促进因素和障碍:一项调查。
背景:已经注意到招募全科医生(gp)加入临床实践指南小组(cpgp)的困难。然而,人们对这些挑战的具体性质知之甚少。我们的目标是调查(1)全科医生对他们参与临床实践指南制定的重要性的见解;(2)全科医生参与cpgp的最重要的促进因素和障碍。方法:在本次调查中,我们邀请了2017-2022年期间在芬兰医学会现行护理指南中担任CPGP成员的全科医生(n = 78)进行电子邮件调查,收集了受访者在临床实践指南过程之前、期间和之后的背景和全科医生参与方面的信息。从十二指肠登记中确定全科医生。在本文中,我们报告了数据的定性分析。我们分析了开放式问题的演绎(使用WONCA核心竞争力)和归纳关于GP参与的重要原因的问题。归纳分析了参与的促进因素和障碍。结果:39名全科医生(50.0%)回复。反映全科医生参与cpgp重要性的三个最重要的因素是全科医生对初级保健管理的理解,全科医生作为临床实践指南的主要目标群体的作用,以及全科医生特定的解决问题的技能。最重要的促进因素是与指导工作相关的信息和教育、雇主的支持态度和财政支持。相反,缺乏对研究证据进行批判性评价的时间和知识是最重要的障碍。结论:应加强促进因素,减少参与障碍,支持全科医生参与cpgp。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信