Increased Mortality and Morbidity in Patients With Heart Failure With Sarcoidosis Compared With Other Causes: A Propensity-Matched Nationwide Cohort Study.

IF 5.3 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Journal of the American Heart Association Pub Date : 2025-10-07 Epub Date: 2025-09-30 DOI:10.1161/JAHA.125.041944
Entela Bollano, Michael Fu, Aldina Pivodic, Christian L Polte, Ulf Dahlström, Emanuele Bobbio
{"title":"Increased Mortality and Morbidity in Patients With Heart Failure With Sarcoidosis Compared With Other Causes: A Propensity-Matched Nationwide Cohort Study.","authors":"Entela Bollano, Michael Fu, Aldina Pivodic, Christian L Polte, Ulf Dahlström, Emanuele Bobbio","doi":"10.1161/JAHA.125.041944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prognosis of heart failure (HF) from ischemic heart disease (IHD) is generally worse than from dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). The impact of prior sarcoidosis on HF outcomes is unknown. We evaluated the prognostic impact of sarcoidosis in HF compared with IHD-HF and DCM-HF using SwedeHF (Swedish Heart Failure Registry).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified patients with sarcoidosis before HF diagnosis (SC-HF) and propensity-matched them to patients with DCM-HF or IHD-HF between 2003 and 2020. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality; secondary outcomes were cardiovascular death and hospital readmission.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 422 patients with SC-HF, 6913 with DCM-HF, and 47 164 with IHD-HF were eligible. After 1:2 matching, 365 patients with SC-HF (median follow-up 2.9 years) were compared with 730 with DCM-HF (3.6 years), and 418 with SC-HF (2.8 years) with 836 with IHD-HF (3.6 years). Baseline characteristics were well balanced. Patients with SC-HF had more comorbidities than DCM-HF but fewer than IHD-HF. One-year all-cause mortality was higher in patients with SC-HF than DCM-HF (12.9% versus 8.6%; hazard ratio [HR, 1.51] [95% CI, 1.04-2.21]; <i>P</i>=0.031), along with higher readmission rates. Compared patients with IHD-HF, those with SC-HF also showed higher 1-year mortality (14.8% versus 9.7%; HR, 1.58 [95% CI, 1.14-2.20]; <i>P</i>=0.006). Similar relative risks were observed across full follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sarcoidosis-associated HF is linked to significantly higher mortality than both DCM and IHD and to higher morbidity than DCM. These findings underscore the need for heightened clinical attention and may warrant tailored management strategies for this high-risk group.</p>","PeriodicalId":54370,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Heart Association","volume":" ","pages":"e041944"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.125.041944","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The prognosis of heart failure (HF) from ischemic heart disease (IHD) is generally worse than from dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). The impact of prior sarcoidosis on HF outcomes is unknown. We evaluated the prognostic impact of sarcoidosis in HF compared with IHD-HF and DCM-HF using SwedeHF (Swedish Heart Failure Registry).

Methods: We identified patients with sarcoidosis before HF diagnosis (SC-HF) and propensity-matched them to patients with DCM-HF or IHD-HF between 2003 and 2020. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality; secondary outcomes were cardiovascular death and hospital readmission.

Results: A total of 422 patients with SC-HF, 6913 with DCM-HF, and 47 164 with IHD-HF were eligible. After 1:2 matching, 365 patients with SC-HF (median follow-up 2.9 years) were compared with 730 with DCM-HF (3.6 years), and 418 with SC-HF (2.8 years) with 836 with IHD-HF (3.6 years). Baseline characteristics were well balanced. Patients with SC-HF had more comorbidities than DCM-HF but fewer than IHD-HF. One-year all-cause mortality was higher in patients with SC-HF than DCM-HF (12.9% versus 8.6%; hazard ratio [HR, 1.51] [95% CI, 1.04-2.21]; P=0.031), along with higher readmission rates. Compared patients with IHD-HF, those with SC-HF also showed higher 1-year mortality (14.8% versus 9.7%; HR, 1.58 [95% CI, 1.14-2.20]; P=0.006). Similar relative risks were observed across full follow-up.

Conclusions: Sarcoidosis-associated HF is linked to significantly higher mortality than both DCM and IHD and to higher morbidity than DCM. These findings underscore the need for heightened clinical attention and may warrant tailored management strategies for this high-risk group.

与其他原因相比,结节病心力衰竭患者的死亡率和发病率增加:一项倾向匹配的全国队列研究
背景:缺血性心脏病(IHD)引起的心力衰竭(HF)的预后通常比扩张型心肌病(DCM)差。既往结节病对心衰结局的影响尚不清楚。我们使用SwedeHF(瑞典心力衰竭登记)评估了结节病对HF与IHD-HF和DCM-HF患者预后的影响。方法:我们确定了在HF诊断前患有结节病的患者(SC-HF),并将其与2003年至2020年间患有DCM-HF或IHD-HF的患者进行倾向匹配。主要结局是全因死亡率;次要结局是心血管死亡和再入院。结果:共有422例SC-HF患者、6913例DCM-HF患者和47164例IHD-HF患者入选。1:2匹配后,365例SC-HF患者(中位随访2.9年)与730例DCM-HF患者(3.6年)、418例SC-HF患者(2.8年)和836例IHD-HF患者(3.6年)进行了比较。基线特征平衡良好。SC-HF患者的合并症多于DCM-HF,但少于IHD-HF。SC-HF患者一年的全因死亡率高于DCM-HF患者(12.9% vs 8.6%;风险比[HR, 1.51] [95% CI, 1.04-2.21]; P=0.031),再入院率也更高。与IHD-HF患者相比,SC-HF患者的1年死亡率也更高(14.8% vs 9.7%; HR, 1.58 [95% CI, 1.14-2.20]; P=0.006)。在整个随访中观察到类似的相对风险。结论:结节病相关性心衰的死亡率明显高于DCM和IHD,发病率也高于DCM。这些发现强调了加强临床关注的必要性,并可能为这一高危人群提供量身定制的管理策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the American Heart Association
Journal of the American Heart Association CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
1749
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: As an Open Access journal, JAHA - Journal of the American Heart Association is rapidly and freely available, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice. JAHA is an authoritative, peer-reviewed Open Access journal focusing on cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. JAHA provides a global forum for basic and clinical research and timely reviews on cardiovascular disease and stroke. As an Open Access journal, its content is free on publication to read, download, and share, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信