Exploring barriers to human milk banking acceptability among nursing mothers in Iran using social cognitive perspectives.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Mahnoush Karami, Zeinab Zaremohzzabieh, Mansoureh Zarean, Ali-Reza Ahmadi
{"title":"Exploring barriers to human milk banking acceptability among nursing mothers in Iran using social cognitive perspectives.","authors":"Mahnoush Karami, Zeinab Zaremohzzabieh, Mansoureh Zarean, Ali-Reza Ahmadi","doi":"10.1186/s13006-025-00767-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite extensive global research on mothers' intentions regarding human milk banking (HMB), its acceptability remains underexplored in non-Western contexts, particularly in Muslim-majority countries. This study investigates barriers to HMB acceptability among nursing mothers in Iran through the lens of Social Cognitive Theory (SCT), emphasizing how cultural, religious, and contextual factors intersect with maternal decision-making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative study was conducted in Tehran, Iran, between August and October 2024. Semi-structured interviews were held with twelve nursing mothers of premature infants unable to breastfeed. Data were analyzed thematically using Braun and Clarke's six-step approach, guided by SCT to capture the interplay between personal, behavioral, and environmental influences on mothers' decision-making regarding HMB. Rigorous strategies, including iterative coding and peer debriefing, were employed to ensure trustworthiness of the analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three overarching themes emerged. Personal factors included emotional states, risk perceptions, self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and religious beliefs and ethics. Behavioral factors comprised trust-based decision-making and past behavioral patterns, which shaped willingness to engage with HMB. Environmental factors involved institutional accessibility, social support systems, authoritative influence, and cultural norms. Findings revealed that mothers experienced emotional conflict, mistrust in milk safety, and religious concerns about milk kinship and halal practices. Institutional and logistical barriers, coupled with lack of family and community support, further reduced HMB acceptability. Nevertheless, participants emphasized that religious endorsements, transparent regulations, health professional guidance, and improved service accessibility could enhance trust and participation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights how reciprocal interactions among personal beliefs, behavioral patterns, and environmental contexts shape the acceptability of HMB among Iranian mothers. To improve uptake, culturally sensitive interventions are essential particularly those involving religious authorities, healthcare professionals, and awareness campaigns to address misconceptions and build trust. Strengthening institutional accessibility and transparency can further promote HMB as a viable feeding option. Future research should also examine the roles of socioeconomic status, healthcare access, and generational differences to broaden the evidence base for culturally adapted HMB policies in Muslim-majority contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":54266,"journal":{"name":"International Breastfeeding Journal","volume":"20 1","pages":"71"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12482545/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Breastfeeding Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-025-00767-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite extensive global research on mothers' intentions regarding human milk banking (HMB), its acceptability remains underexplored in non-Western contexts, particularly in Muslim-majority countries. This study investigates barriers to HMB acceptability among nursing mothers in Iran through the lens of Social Cognitive Theory (SCT), emphasizing how cultural, religious, and contextual factors intersect with maternal decision-making.

Methods: A qualitative study was conducted in Tehran, Iran, between August and October 2024. Semi-structured interviews were held with twelve nursing mothers of premature infants unable to breastfeed. Data were analyzed thematically using Braun and Clarke's six-step approach, guided by SCT to capture the interplay between personal, behavioral, and environmental influences on mothers' decision-making regarding HMB. Rigorous strategies, including iterative coding and peer debriefing, were employed to ensure trustworthiness of the analysis.

Results: Three overarching themes emerged. Personal factors included emotional states, risk perceptions, self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and religious beliefs and ethics. Behavioral factors comprised trust-based decision-making and past behavioral patterns, which shaped willingness to engage with HMB. Environmental factors involved institutional accessibility, social support systems, authoritative influence, and cultural norms. Findings revealed that mothers experienced emotional conflict, mistrust in milk safety, and religious concerns about milk kinship and halal practices. Institutional and logistical barriers, coupled with lack of family and community support, further reduced HMB acceptability. Nevertheless, participants emphasized that religious endorsements, transparent regulations, health professional guidance, and improved service accessibility could enhance trust and participation.

Conclusions: This study highlights how reciprocal interactions among personal beliefs, behavioral patterns, and environmental contexts shape the acceptability of HMB among Iranian mothers. To improve uptake, culturally sensitive interventions are essential particularly those involving religious authorities, healthcare professionals, and awareness campaigns to address misconceptions and build trust. Strengthening institutional accessibility and transparency can further promote HMB as a viable feeding option. Future research should also examine the roles of socioeconomic status, healthcare access, and generational differences to broaden the evidence base for culturally adapted HMB policies in Muslim-majority contexts.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

从社会认知角度探讨伊朗哺乳母亲接受母乳银行的障碍。
背景:尽管对母乳银行(HMB)的母亲意向进行了广泛的全球研究,但在非西方背景下,特别是在穆斯林占多数的国家,母乳银行的可接受性仍未得到充分探讨。本研究通过社会认知理论(SCT)的视角调查了伊朗哺乳母亲接受HMB的障碍,强调了文化、宗教和背景因素如何与母亲的决策交叉。方法:于2024年8月至10月在伊朗德黑兰进行定性研究。对12位无法母乳喂养早产儿的哺乳母亲进行了半结构化访谈。采用Braun和Clarke的六步方法对数据进行了主题分析,并以SCT为指导,以捕捉个人、行为和环境影响对母亲关于HMB决策的相互作用。采用了严格的策略,包括迭代编码和同行汇报,以确保分析的可信度。结果:出现了三个总体主题。个人因素包括情绪状态、风险感知、自我效能、结果预期、宗教信仰和伦理。行为因素包括基于信任的决策和过去的行为模式,这些因素决定了参与HMB的意愿。环境因素包括制度可及性、社会支持系统、权威影响和文化规范。调查结果显示,母亲经历了情感冲突,对牛奶安全的不信任,以及对牛奶亲属关系和清真做法的宗教担忧。体制和后勤障碍,加上缺乏家庭和社区支持,进一步降低了HMB的可接受性。然而,与会者强调,宗教认可、透明的条例、卫生专业指导和改善服务可获得性可增进信任和参与。结论:本研究强调了个人信仰、行为模式和环境背景之间的相互作用如何影响伊朗母亲对HMB的接受程度。为了提高接受度,必须采取具有文化敏感性的干预措施,特别是涉及宗教当局、保健专业人员和提高认识运动的干预措施,以消除误解和建立信任。加强机构的可及性和透明度可以进一步促进HMB作为一种可行的喂养选择。未来的研究还应该检查社会经济地位、医疗保健获取和代际差异的作用,以扩大在穆斯林占多数的背景下适应文化的HMB政策的证据基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Breastfeeding Journal
International Breastfeeding Journal Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
11.40%
发文量
76
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊介绍: Breastfeeding is recognized as an important public health issue with enormous social and economic implications. Infants who do not receive breast milk are likely to experience poorer health outcomes than breastfed infants; mothers who do not breastfeed increase their own health risks. Publications on the topic of breastfeeding are wide ranging. Articles about breastfeeding are currently published journals focused on nursing, midwifery, paediatric, obstetric, family medicine, public health, immunology, physiology, sociology and many other topics. In addition, electronic publishing allows fast publication time for authors and Open Access ensures the journal is easily accessible to readers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信