Evolving Perspectives in Surgery for Mitral Regurgitation: Why Sex Matters.

IF 5.3 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Journal of the American Heart Association Pub Date : 2025-10-07 Epub Date: 2025-09-30 DOI:10.1161/JAHA.125.044639
Edouard Long, Minji Ho, Sarah Guo, Tanisha Rajah, Sara Volpi, Narain Moorjani, Jason Ali, Francis C Wells, Antonio Bivona, Vassilios Avlonitis, Gianluca Lucchese, Rajdeep Bilkhu, Alessia Rossi, Paolo Bosco
{"title":"Evolving Perspectives in Surgery for Mitral Regurgitation: Why Sex Matters.","authors":"Edouard Long, Minji Ho, Sarah Guo, Tanisha Rajah, Sara Volpi, Narain Moorjani, Jason Ali, Francis C Wells, Antonio Bivona, Vassilios Avlonitis, Gianluca Lucchese, Rajdeep Bilkhu, Alessia Rossi, Paolo Bosco","doi":"10.1161/JAHA.125.044639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is a growing body of evidence investigating sex differences in the presentation, assessment, and outcomes of patients with mitral regurgitation (MR) undergoing mitral valve surgery. It has been shown that women present at older ages, with more comorbidities and more severe symptoms. Compared with male patients, female patients have longer intervals to surgery, lower rates of surgery, and receive fewer mitral valve repairs (as opposed to replacements). On imaging, left ventricular cavity sizes and many quantitative measures of MR severity differ significantly by sex, and current guidelines do not account for this. While sex differences in surgical outcomes have been documented, these are largely limited to primary MR and are based on older studies, underscoring the need for further research. Data on sex differences in transcatheter interventions for MR are inconclusive and heterogeneous, complicating comparisons to surgery. To address these disparities, sex-specific thresholds for intervention in primary MR, standardization of the quantification of MR severity by sex, and further prospective studies are required. As we move into an era of precision medicine, it is critical to recognize sex as a key determinant of cardiovascular care. In patients undergoing surgery for MR, further research should evaluate whether current intervention thresholds and management pathways are appropriately tailored to female patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":54370,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Heart Association","volume":" ","pages":"e044639"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.125.044639","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a growing body of evidence investigating sex differences in the presentation, assessment, and outcomes of patients with mitral regurgitation (MR) undergoing mitral valve surgery. It has been shown that women present at older ages, with more comorbidities and more severe symptoms. Compared with male patients, female patients have longer intervals to surgery, lower rates of surgery, and receive fewer mitral valve repairs (as opposed to replacements). On imaging, left ventricular cavity sizes and many quantitative measures of MR severity differ significantly by sex, and current guidelines do not account for this. While sex differences in surgical outcomes have been documented, these are largely limited to primary MR and are based on older studies, underscoring the need for further research. Data on sex differences in transcatheter interventions for MR are inconclusive and heterogeneous, complicating comparisons to surgery. To address these disparities, sex-specific thresholds for intervention in primary MR, standardization of the quantification of MR severity by sex, and further prospective studies are required. As we move into an era of precision medicine, it is critical to recognize sex as a key determinant of cardiovascular care. In patients undergoing surgery for MR, further research should evaluate whether current intervention thresholds and management pathways are appropriately tailored to female patients.

二尖瓣反流手术的发展前景:为什么性别很重要。
越来越多的证据表明,在二尖瓣手术中二尖瓣返流(MR)患者的表现、评估和预后方面存在性别差异。研究表明,女性出现的年龄越大,合并症越多,症状也越严重。与男性患者相比,女性患者手术间隔时间较长,手术率较低,接受二尖瓣修复(与置换相反)的次数较少。在影像学上,左心室腔的大小和许多MR严重程度的定量测量因性别而有显著差异,目前的指南没有考虑到这一点。虽然手术结果的性别差异已被记录,但这些差异主要局限于原发性MR,并且基于较早的研究,强调了进一步研究的必要性。经导管核磁共振介入治疗的性别差异数据不确定且不均匀,使其与手术比较更加复杂。为了解决这些差异,需要对原发性MR进行性别特异性干预阈值、按性别量化MR严重程度的标准化以及进一步的前瞻性研究。随着我们进入精准医疗时代,认识到性别是心血管护理的关键决定因素是至关重要的。在接受MR手术的患者中,进一步的研究应该评估当前的干预阈值和管理途径是否适合女性患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the American Heart Association
Journal of the American Heart Association CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
1749
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: As an Open Access journal, JAHA - Journal of the American Heart Association is rapidly and freely available, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice. JAHA is an authoritative, peer-reviewed Open Access journal focusing on cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. JAHA provides a global forum for basic and clinical research and timely reviews on cardiovascular disease and stroke. As an Open Access journal, its content is free on publication to read, download, and share, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信