The roles of COVID-19 pandemic exposure and telehealth in prenatal care access for rural and racial minority communities in the United States: A retrospective cohort study

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Peiyin Hung PhD, Jiani Yu PhD, Adiba B. Promiti MS, Berry A. Campbell MD, MFM, Nansi S. Boghossian PhD, Anirban Chatterjee MD, Bo Cai PhD, Jihong Liu ScD, the National COVID Cohort Collaborative Consortium
{"title":"The roles of COVID-19 pandemic exposure and telehealth in prenatal care access for rural and racial minority communities in the United States: A retrospective cohort study","authors":"Peiyin Hung PhD,&nbsp;Jiani Yu PhD,&nbsp;Adiba B. Promiti MS,&nbsp;Berry A. Campbell MD, MFM,&nbsp;Nansi S. Boghossian PhD,&nbsp;Anirban Chatterjee MD,&nbsp;Bo Cai PhD,&nbsp;Jihong Liu ScD,&nbsp;the National COVID Cohort Collaborative Consortium","doi":"10.1111/jrh.70077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>To examine how COVID-19 public health emergency (PHE) exposure during pregnancy and telehealth use were associated with rural-urban and racial/ethnic differences in prenatal care initiation timing and frequency.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This retrospective cohort study of 349,682 pregnancies to birthing individuals who received both prenatal and intrapartum care at the 75 health systems in the United States contributing to the National Clinical Cohort Collaborative (N3C) from 6/1/2018 through 5/31/2022. Outcomes included prenatal care initiation timing and the number of prenatal care visits. Prenatal periods were categorized into 3 PHE exposure groups: (1) never, (2) partially, and (3) fully exposed to the PHE. The full-exposure group was further categorized into telehealth users and those with exclusively in-person care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>The full-exposure group with telehealth uptake had the earliest prenatal care initiation (median: 9 weeks [interquartile range: 7-13]) and the most visits (19 visits [12-20]). In contrast, the full-exposure group <i>without</i> telehealth use initiated care the latest (11 weeks [8-21]) and had the fewest visits (13 visits [6-22]). Rural-urban disparities persisted; however, telehealth users in both groups had earlier initiation and more visits. Racial and ethnic disparities in timeliness to initiation were most pronounced among the full-exposure group with telehealth (Black-White: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.76, 95% CI, 0.70-0.83; Hispanic-White: aHR: 0.62, 95% CI, 0.58-0.68), compared to the full-exposure group with exclusively in-person care (Black-White: 0.95 [0.93-0.94]; Hispanic-White: 0.80 [0.80-0.81]).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Prenatal telehealth care improved early initiation but also exacerbated racial/ethnic disparities in the timeliness of prenatal care access. However, rural-urban disparities persisted.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":"41 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12481008/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jrh.70077","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To examine how COVID-19 public health emergency (PHE) exposure during pregnancy and telehealth use were associated with rural-urban and racial/ethnic differences in prenatal care initiation timing and frequency.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study of 349,682 pregnancies to birthing individuals who received both prenatal and intrapartum care at the 75 health systems in the United States contributing to the National Clinical Cohort Collaborative (N3C) from 6/1/2018 through 5/31/2022. Outcomes included prenatal care initiation timing and the number of prenatal care visits. Prenatal periods were categorized into 3 PHE exposure groups: (1) never, (2) partially, and (3) fully exposed to the PHE. The full-exposure group was further categorized into telehealth users and those with exclusively in-person care.

Findings

The full-exposure group with telehealth uptake had the earliest prenatal care initiation (median: 9 weeks [interquartile range: 7-13]) and the most visits (19 visits [12-20]). In contrast, the full-exposure group without telehealth use initiated care the latest (11 weeks [8-21]) and had the fewest visits (13 visits [6-22]). Rural-urban disparities persisted; however, telehealth users in both groups had earlier initiation and more visits. Racial and ethnic disparities in timeliness to initiation were most pronounced among the full-exposure group with telehealth (Black-White: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.76, 95% CI, 0.70-0.83; Hispanic-White: aHR: 0.62, 95% CI, 0.58-0.68), compared to the full-exposure group with exclusively in-person care (Black-White: 0.95 [0.93-0.94]; Hispanic-White: 0.80 [0.80-0.81]).

Conclusions

Prenatal telehealth care improved early initiation but also exacerbated racial/ethnic disparities in the timeliness of prenatal care access. However, rural-urban disparities persisted.

Abstract Image

COVID-19大流行暴露和远程医疗在美国农村和少数族裔社区产前护理获取中的作用:一项回顾性队列研究
目的:探讨妊娠期COVID-19突发公共卫生事件(PHE)暴露和远程医疗使用与城乡和种族/民族产前护理开始时间和频率差异的关系。方法:从2018年6月1日至2022年5月31日,这项回顾性队列研究纳入了349,682名怀孕至分娩的个体,这些个体在美国75个卫生系统接受了产前和产时护理,这些卫生系统为国家临床队列协作(N3C)做出了贡献。结果包括产前护理开始时间和产前护理访问次数。产前期被分为三个PHE暴露组:(1)从不暴露,(2)部分暴露,(3)完全暴露于PHE。全面接触组进一步分为远程保健用户和仅接受面对面护理的用户。结果:远程医疗全暴露组产前护理开始时间最早(中位数:9周[四分位数间距:7-13]),就诊次数最多(19次[12-20])。相比之下,未使用远程医疗的全暴露组开始护理时间最晚(11周[8-21]),就诊次数最少(13次[6-22])。城乡差距依然存在;然而,两组的远程医疗用户都有较早的开始和更多的访问。与完全面对面护理的完全接触组(黑人-白人:调整风险比[aHR]: 0.76, 95% CI, 0.70-0.83;西班牙裔-白人:aHR: 0.62, 95% CI, 0.58-0.68)相比,远程医疗的全面接触组(黑人-白人:0.95[0.93-0.94];西班牙裔-白人:0.80[0.80-0.81]),在开始治疗的及时性方面的种族和民族差异最为明显。结论:产前远程保健改善了早期启动,但也加剧了产前护理获得及时性的种族/民族差异。然而,城乡差距依然存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Rural Health
Journal of Rural Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
86
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Health, a quarterly journal published by the NRHA, offers a variety of original research relevant and important to rural health. Some examples include evaluations, case studies, and analyses related to health status and behavior, as well as to health work force, policy and access issues. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies are welcome. Highest priority is given to manuscripts that reflect scholarly quality, demonstrate methodological rigor, and emphasize practical implications. The journal also publishes articles with an international rural health perspective, commentaries, book reviews and letters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信