High-Chondrocyte-Viability Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation in the Knee for Revision of Failed Cartilage Repair Procedures.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Steven F DeFroda, Julian M Moore, Kylee Rucinski, James P Stannard, Clayton W Nuelle, James L Cook
{"title":"High-Chondrocyte-Viability Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation in the Knee for Revision of Failed Cartilage Repair Procedures.","authors":"Steven F DeFroda, Julian M Moore, Kylee Rucinski, James P Stannard, Clayton W Nuelle, James L Cook","doi":"10.1055/a-2710-6069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Revision osteochondral allograft transplantation (OCAT) has historically yielded inferior outcomes compared to primary procedures. This study evaluates outcomes following revision OCAT using high-chondrocyte-viability (HCV) OCAs for functional graft survival. A prospective registry was analyzed for HCV OCAT outcomes. Patients were grouped into primary (n=182) or revision (n=70) OCAT cohorts. Demographic, surgical, and follow-up data were collected. Revision cases were further subclassified based on prior cartilage procedures (marrow stimulation, osteochondral, or cell-matrix-based). Functional graft survival and validated patient-reported outcomes were assessed at a mean follow-up of 43 months. At final follow-up, functional graft survival was 79.1% for primary and 71.4% for revision OCAT. Overall survival at >2-year follow-up was 84% (primary) and 80% (revision). Patients with failed revision OCAT reported significantly lower PROMIS Physical Function scores at 1-year (mean: 40.8, p=.026). Bipolar tibiofemoral revisions conferred increased failure rates (OR 3.86, p=.033). Cell-matrix-based revision cases had significantly higher graft survival (100%) compared to osteochondral revisions (58.6%, p=.049). Satisfaction with revision OCAT was high (75.0%), and 84.1% would undergo the procedure again. With evidence-based patient selection, individuals who have failed previous cartilage defect surgical treatments and meet indication criteria are likely to benefit from revision OCAT with HCV allografts. Optimal candidates for revision OCAT in the knee are patients with a history of marrow stimulation or cell-based matrix procedures who have limited comorbidities, do not require tibiofemoral bipolar OCAT, and strictly adhere to postoperative restriction and rehabilitation protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":48798,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Knee Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Knee Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2710-6069","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Revision osteochondral allograft transplantation (OCAT) has historically yielded inferior outcomes compared to primary procedures. This study evaluates outcomes following revision OCAT using high-chondrocyte-viability (HCV) OCAs for functional graft survival. A prospective registry was analyzed for HCV OCAT outcomes. Patients were grouped into primary (n=182) or revision (n=70) OCAT cohorts. Demographic, surgical, and follow-up data were collected. Revision cases were further subclassified based on prior cartilage procedures (marrow stimulation, osteochondral, or cell-matrix-based). Functional graft survival and validated patient-reported outcomes were assessed at a mean follow-up of 43 months. At final follow-up, functional graft survival was 79.1% for primary and 71.4% for revision OCAT. Overall survival at >2-year follow-up was 84% (primary) and 80% (revision). Patients with failed revision OCAT reported significantly lower PROMIS Physical Function scores at 1-year (mean: 40.8, p=.026). Bipolar tibiofemoral revisions conferred increased failure rates (OR 3.86, p=.033). Cell-matrix-based revision cases had significantly higher graft survival (100%) compared to osteochondral revisions (58.6%, p=.049). Satisfaction with revision OCAT was high (75.0%), and 84.1% would undergo the procedure again. With evidence-based patient selection, individuals who have failed previous cartilage defect surgical treatments and meet indication criteria are likely to benefit from revision OCAT with HCV allografts. Optimal candidates for revision OCAT in the knee are patients with a history of marrow stimulation or cell-based matrix procedures who have limited comorbidities, do not require tibiofemoral bipolar OCAT, and strictly adhere to postoperative restriction and rehabilitation protocols.

高软骨细胞活力的同种异体骨软骨移植修复失败的膝关节。
翻修骨软骨同种异体移植物移植(OCAT)在历史上产生了较差的结果。本研究评估了使用高软骨细胞活力(HCV) oca进行功能性移植物存活的OCAT改版后的结果。对HCV OCAT结果进行前瞻性登记分析。患者被分为初级(n=182)或修订(n=70) OCAT队列。收集了人口统计、手术和随访数据。翻修病例根据之前的软骨手术(骨髓刺激、骨软骨或基于细胞基质的)进一步细分。在平均43个月的随访中评估功能性移植物存活和经过验证的患者报告的结果。在最后的随访中,原发OCAT的功能性移植物存活率为79.1%,改良OCAT的功能性移植物存活率为71.4%。>2年随访时的总生存率为84%(原发性)和80%(修订)。OCAT改版失败的患者报告1年时PROMIS身体功能评分显著降低(平均值:40.8,p= 0.026)。双极胫股翻修增加了失败率(OR 3.86, p= 0.033)。细胞基质修复的移植存活率(100%)明显高于骨软骨修复(58.6%,p= 0.049)。对改版OCAT的满意度较高(75.0%),84.1%的人愿意再次进行手术。基于证据的患者选择,先前软骨缺损手术治疗失败且符合适应症标准的个体可能受益于HCV同种异体移植的OCAT改版。有骨髓刺激史或细胞基质手术史,合并症有限,不需要胫股双极OCAT,并严格遵守术后限制和康复方案的膝关节翻修OCAT的最佳候选人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
139
期刊介绍: The Journal of Knee Surgery covers a range of issues relating to the orthopaedic techniques of arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and reconstructive surgery of the knee joint. In addition to original peer-review articles, this periodical provides details on emerging surgical techniques, as well as reviews and special focus sections. Topics of interest include cruciate ligament repair and reconstruction, bone grafting, cartilage regeneration, and magnetic resonance imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信