Luke Edwards, Elizabeth Nelmes, Maddalena Ardissino, Helen Lin Jia Qi, Shaman Jhanji, David B Antcliffe, Kate C Tatham
{"title":"The evolution of mortality from sepsis in patients with cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Luke Edwards, Elizabeth Nelmes, Maddalena Ardissino, Helen Lin Jia Qi, Shaman Jhanji, David B Antcliffe, Kate C Tatham","doi":"10.1177/17511437251363762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Increasing numbers of patients with cancer are being admitted to intensive care units (ICU) with sepsis. The mortality from sepsis and septic shock in these patients is unclear. This study aimed to establish mortality from sepsis and septic shock in patients with cancer admitted to ICU and assess mortality trends over time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a literature search using MEDLINE and EMBASE. Included studies enrolled adult patients with cancer admitted to ICU with sepsis or septic shock and reported outcomes of interest. Studies were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for risk of bias and the quality assessment tool for observational cohort and cross-sectional studies. We performed a meta-analysis to estimate pooled ICU, hospital and 30-day mortality from sepsis and septic shock and a multivariate meta-regression to assess mortality trends over time. The study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022341277).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-five articles were included. The pooled ICU, hospital and 30-day mortality for sepsis was 44% (95% CI 38%-50%), 54% (95% CI 49%-60%) and 49% (95% CI 44%-55%) respectively. The pooled ICU, hospital and 30-day mortality for septic shock was 51% (95% CI 45%-57%), 62.6% (95% CI 56%-69%) and 54% (95% CI 46%-61%) respectively. There was significant heterogeneity between studies. The meta-regression identified decreasing ICU and hospital mortality from sepsis, and decreasing ICU mortality from septic shock.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with cancer admitted to ICU with sepsis face a significant mortality risk greater than that of the general population, despite decreasing mortality over time. Further research is required to improve outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":39161,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","volume":" ","pages":"17511437251363762"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12476371/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17511437251363762","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Increasing numbers of patients with cancer are being admitted to intensive care units (ICU) with sepsis. The mortality from sepsis and septic shock in these patients is unclear. This study aimed to establish mortality from sepsis and septic shock in patients with cancer admitted to ICU and assess mortality trends over time.
Methods: We conducted a literature search using MEDLINE and EMBASE. Included studies enrolled adult patients with cancer admitted to ICU with sepsis or septic shock and reported outcomes of interest. Studies were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for risk of bias and the quality assessment tool for observational cohort and cross-sectional studies. We performed a meta-analysis to estimate pooled ICU, hospital and 30-day mortality from sepsis and septic shock and a multivariate meta-regression to assess mortality trends over time. The study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022341277).
Results: Twenty-five articles were included. The pooled ICU, hospital and 30-day mortality for sepsis was 44% (95% CI 38%-50%), 54% (95% CI 49%-60%) and 49% (95% CI 44%-55%) respectively. The pooled ICU, hospital and 30-day mortality for septic shock was 51% (95% CI 45%-57%), 62.6% (95% CI 56%-69%) and 54% (95% CI 46%-61%) respectively. There was significant heterogeneity between studies. The meta-regression identified decreasing ICU and hospital mortality from sepsis, and decreasing ICU mortality from septic shock.
Conclusion: Patients with cancer admitted to ICU with sepsis face a significant mortality risk greater than that of the general population, despite decreasing mortality over time. Further research is required to improve outcomes.
背景:越来越多的癌症患者因脓毒症被送进重症监护病房(ICU)。这些患者脓毒症和感染性休克的死亡率尚不清楚。本研究旨在确定ICU收治的癌症患者脓毒症和感染性休克的死亡率,并评估死亡率随时间的变化趋势。方法:采用MEDLINE和EMBASE进行文献检索。纳入的研究纳入了因脓毒症或脓毒性休克入住ICU的成年癌症患者,并报告了感兴趣的结果。研究使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估偏倚风险,并使用观察队列和横断面研究的质量评估工具评估。我们进行了荟萃分析来估计ICU、医院和脓毒症和感染性休克的30天死亡率,并进行了多变量荟萃回归来评估死亡率随时间的趋势。该研究已在PROSPERO注册(CRD42022341277)。结果:共纳入25篇文章。ICU、医院和30天脓毒症的总死亡率分别为44% (95% CI 38%-50%)、54% (95% CI 49%-60%)和49% (95% CI 44%-55%)。脓毒性休克在ICU、医院和30天的总死亡率分别为51% (95% CI 45%-57%)、62.6% (95% CI 56%-69%)和54% (95% CI 46%-61%)。研究之间存在显著的异质性。meta回归发现脓毒症ICU死亡率和住院死亡率下降,脓毒症休克ICU死亡率下降。结论:ICU合并脓毒症的癌症患者死亡率明显高于普通人群,尽管死亡率随时间降低。需要进一步的研究来改善结果。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the Intensive Care Society (JICS) is an international, peer-reviewed journal that strives to disseminate clinically and scientifically relevant peer-reviewed research, evaluation, experience and opinion to all staff working in the field of intensive care medicine. Our aim is to inform clinicians on the provision of best practice and provide direction for innovative scientific research in what is one of the broadest and most multi-disciplinary healthcare specialties. While original articles and systematic reviews lie at the heart of the Journal, we also value and recognise the need for opinion articles, case reports and correspondence to guide clinically and scientifically important areas in which conclusive evidence is lacking. The style of the Journal is based on its founding mission statement to ‘instruct, inform and entertain by encompassing the best aspects of both tabloid and broadsheet''.