The role of corticosteroids in the management of non-COVID-19 severe community-acquired pneumonia in the intensive care unit: A narrative review.

IF 1.4 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Isis Terrington, Olivia Cox, Patrick Copley, Benjamin Eastwood, Elizabeth Webb, Cathrine McKenzie, Kordo Saeed, Andrew Conway-Morris, Michael P W Grocott, Ahilanandan Dushianthan
{"title":"The role of corticosteroids in the management of non-COVID-19 severe community-acquired pneumonia in the intensive care unit: A narrative review.","authors":"Isis Terrington, Olivia Cox, Patrick Copley, Benjamin Eastwood, Elizabeth Webb, Cathrine McKenzie, Kordo Saeed, Andrew Conway-Morris, Michael P W Grocott, Ahilanandan Dushianthan","doi":"10.1177/17511437251374816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Severe community-acquired pneumonia (sCAP) is associated with a significant health burden, both in the UK and globally, with intensive care support needed for many patients. The high morbidity and mortality associated with sCAP has led to the exploration of adjunctive therapies that may help reduce disease burden and improve clinical outcomes. One such proposed treatment is corticosteroids, aiming to moderate the disproportionate inflammation caused by sCAP. Despite several studies suggesting potential benefits, the use of corticosteroids in patients with sCAP remains contentious, with recent large trials producing conflicting results. These variations in trial outcomes have resulted in conflicting national and international guidelines. Such discrepancies align with findings from a recent national survey that indicated ongoing clinical uncertainty regarding the use of corticosteroids for sCAP in UK intensive care units. Several factors contribute to these conflicting outcomes, including patient population, the severity classification utilised, the type and duration of interventions provided, and, perhaps most importantly, the lack of pre-phenotyping to identify patients who may benefit most from the treatment. This narrative review aims to examine the recent literature, current guidelines, and evidence for using corticosteroids in sCAP, while exploring the candidate phenotypes of relevance in the design of clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":39161,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","volume":" ","pages":"17511437251374816"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12476378/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17511437251374816","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Severe community-acquired pneumonia (sCAP) is associated with a significant health burden, both in the UK and globally, with intensive care support needed for many patients. The high morbidity and mortality associated with sCAP has led to the exploration of adjunctive therapies that may help reduce disease burden and improve clinical outcomes. One such proposed treatment is corticosteroids, aiming to moderate the disproportionate inflammation caused by sCAP. Despite several studies suggesting potential benefits, the use of corticosteroids in patients with sCAP remains contentious, with recent large trials producing conflicting results. These variations in trial outcomes have resulted in conflicting national and international guidelines. Such discrepancies align with findings from a recent national survey that indicated ongoing clinical uncertainty regarding the use of corticosteroids for sCAP in UK intensive care units. Several factors contribute to these conflicting outcomes, including patient population, the severity classification utilised, the type and duration of interventions provided, and, perhaps most importantly, the lack of pre-phenotyping to identify patients who may benefit most from the treatment. This narrative review aims to examine the recent literature, current guidelines, and evidence for using corticosteroids in sCAP, while exploring the candidate phenotypes of relevance in the design of clinical trials.

皮质类固醇在重症监护病房非covid -19重症社区获得性肺炎管理中的作用:一项叙述性综述
无论是在英国还是在全球,严重社区获得性肺炎(sCAP)都与重大的健康负担相关,许多患者需要重症监护支持。sCAP相关的高发病率和死亡率促使人们探索辅助疗法,以帮助减轻疾病负担和改善临床结果。其中一种建议的治疗方法是皮质类固醇,旨在缓解sCAP引起的不成比例的炎症。尽管有几项研究表明了潜在的益处,但在sCAP患者中使用皮质类固醇仍然存在争议,最近的大型试验产生了相互矛盾的结果。这些试验结果的差异导致了国家和国际指南的冲突。这种差异与最近一项全国调查的结果一致,该调查表明,在英国重症监护病房中,使用皮质类固醇治疗sCAP的临床不确定性持续存在。有几个因素导致了这些相互矛盾的结果,包括患者群体、使用的严重程度分类、提供的干预措施的类型和持续时间,也许最重要的是,缺乏预先表型来识别可能从治疗中获益最多的患者。这篇叙述性综述的目的是检查最近的文献,当前的指南,以及在sCAP中使用皮质类固醇的证据,同时探索临床试验设计中相关的候选表型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Intensive Care Society
Journal of the Intensive Care Society Nursing-Critical Care Nursing
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Intensive Care Society (JICS) is an international, peer-reviewed journal that strives to disseminate clinically and scientifically relevant peer-reviewed research, evaluation, experience and opinion to all staff working in the field of intensive care medicine. Our aim is to inform clinicians on the provision of best practice and provide direction for innovative scientific research in what is one of the broadest and most multi-disciplinary healthcare specialties. While original articles and systematic reviews lie at the heart of the Journal, we also value and recognise the need for opinion articles, case reports and correspondence to guide clinically and scientifically important areas in which conclusive evidence is lacking. The style of the Journal is based on its founding mission statement to ‘instruct, inform and entertain by encompassing the best aspects of both tabloid and broadsheet''.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信