Iago Christofoli de Barros, Matheus Vanzin Fernandes, Santiago Rodríguez Villafuerte, Ajacio Bandeira de Mello Brandão
{"title":"Explant-based prognostic models for hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after liver transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Iago Christofoli de Barros, Matheus Vanzin Fernandes, Santiago Rodríguez Villafuerte, Ajacio Bandeira de Mello Brandão","doi":"10.4254/wjh.v17.i9.111126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Liver transplantation (LT) is the preferred curative treatment for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, approximately 17% of patients experience post-transplant recurrence. Extrahepatic recurrence and early recurrence (within one year after LT) are associated with poorer post-recurrence survival.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess which explant-based prognostic model best predicts HCC recurrence after LT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from inception to January 30, 2025. Nine retrospective studies comprising 5348 patients were included. Three explant-based prognostic models were analyzed: (1) Risk estimation of tumor recurrence after transplant (RETREAT); (2) Decaens; and (3) Predicting Cancer Recurrence Score (PCRS). Primary outcomes included: (1) HCC recurrence rate; and (2) Predictive accuracy of each score over a five-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All studies were retrospective and included validation cohorts from North America, Europe, and Asia. The overall recurrence rate was 7%. For high-risk thresholds, pooled sensitivity and specificity were Risk Estimation of Tumor Recurrence after Transplant (RETREAT) ≥ 5 (0.381/0.953), Decaens ≥ 4 (0.676/0.817), and PCRS ≥ 3 (0.217/0.987). Among high-risk patients, recurrence reached 45% (95%CI: 35.1-57.0). Area under the curve comparisons showed no statistically significant differences among models. Thus, no model demonstrated clear superiority.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although several explant-based models exist, their limited sensitivity suggests that many patients at risk of recurrence remain unidentified. The RETREAT score, developed in a large cohort, remains the most extensively validated. Future approaches should focus on developing improved prognostic tools using larger, preferably prospective datasets, and integrating artificial intelligence to enhance risk stratification and post-transplant surveillance.</p>","PeriodicalId":23687,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Hepatology","volume":"17 9","pages":"111126"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12476779/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v17.i9.111126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Liver transplantation (LT) is the preferred curative treatment for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, approximately 17% of patients experience post-transplant recurrence. Extrahepatic recurrence and early recurrence (within one year after LT) are associated with poorer post-recurrence survival.
Aim: To assess which explant-based prognostic model best predicts HCC recurrence after LT.
Methods: A systematic search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from inception to January 30, 2025. Nine retrospective studies comprising 5348 patients were included. Three explant-based prognostic models were analyzed: (1) Risk estimation of tumor recurrence after transplant (RETREAT); (2) Decaens; and (3) Predicting Cancer Recurrence Score (PCRS). Primary outcomes included: (1) HCC recurrence rate; and (2) Predictive accuracy of each score over a five-year follow-up.
Results: All studies were retrospective and included validation cohorts from North America, Europe, and Asia. The overall recurrence rate was 7%. For high-risk thresholds, pooled sensitivity and specificity were Risk Estimation of Tumor Recurrence after Transplant (RETREAT) ≥ 5 (0.381/0.953), Decaens ≥ 4 (0.676/0.817), and PCRS ≥ 3 (0.217/0.987). Among high-risk patients, recurrence reached 45% (95%CI: 35.1-57.0). Area under the curve comparisons showed no statistically significant differences among models. Thus, no model demonstrated clear superiority.
Conclusion: Although several explant-based models exist, their limited sensitivity suggests that many patients at risk of recurrence remain unidentified. The RETREAT score, developed in a large cohort, remains the most extensively validated. Future approaches should focus on developing improved prognostic tools using larger, preferably prospective datasets, and integrating artificial intelligence to enhance risk stratification and post-transplant surveillance.
背景:肝移植是早期肝细胞癌(HCC)的首选治疗方法。然而,大约17%的患者在移植后出现复发。肝外复发和早期复发(肝移植后1年内)与较差的复发后生存率相关。目的:评估哪一种基于外因的预后模型最能预测肝细胞癌lt后复发。方法:系统检索PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science和Cochrane Library,检索时间为2025年1月30日。9项回顾性研究包括5348例患者。分析三种基于外植体的预后模型:(1)移植后肿瘤复发风险评估(RETREAT);(2) Decaens;(3)预测肿瘤复发评分(PCRS)。主要结局包括:(1)HCC复发率;(2)每项评分在五年随访期间的预测准确性。结果:所有的研究都是回顾性的,包括来自北美、欧洲和亚洲的验证队列。总复发率为7%。对于高危阈值,合并敏感性和特异性分别为:移植后肿瘤复发风险评估(Risk Estimation of Tumor Recurrence after transplantation, RETREAT)≥5(0.381/0.953)、Decaens≥4(0.676/0.817)、PCRS≥3(0.213 /0.987)。高危患者复发率达45% (95%CI: 35.1-57.0)。曲线下面积比较,各模型间差异无统计学意义。因此,没有模型显示出明显的优越性。结论:尽管存在几种基于外植体的模型,但其有限的敏感性表明许多患者的复发风险仍未确定。在大型队列中开发的RETREAT评分仍然是最广泛验证的。未来的方法应侧重于开发改进的预后工具,使用更大的、最好是前瞻性的数据集,并整合人工智能来加强风险分层和移植后监测。